You think terrorists realize how insignificant they are??

[gho3st]

I mean do you expect to fight against countries with way more advanced military technology?? You go through all this trouble to live in secrecy, plan and make bullshyt videos to announce to the world who you have grievances with and what you are to do about it. So if not the terrorists then who really benefits from this shyt??
-They dont make the weapons
- The weapons they are being sold aren't powerful enough to be real threat

 

[zerozero]

terrorism is usually an extreme example of wider unrest that's already happening though breh... in most situations you've seen terrorism you've also seen significant political change because whatever was going on was not going to stay in place in a stable way

 

[B86]

Terrorists are pretty significant, actually... have you not noticed that the majority of us are out here struggling because of the terrorists that control our country ( the US Government)?

 

[gho3st]

Terrorists are pretty significant, actually... have you not noticed that the majority of us are out here struggling because of the terrorists that control our country ( the US Government)?

I'm talking about muhammad in the middle east or africa breh...maybe i should have been more specific

terrorism is usually an extreme example of wider unrest that's already happening though breh... in most situations you've seen terrorism you've also seen significant political change because whatever was going on was not going to stay in place in a stable way

no. How is it that they persist with this course of action when they dont really benefit from it? and if we agree on that, who really does?

 

[MikelArteta]

It took less than 20 terrorists to kill thousands of american and thousands more in war.

 

[gho3st]

It took less than 20 terrorists to kill thousands of american and thousands more in war.

Did they benefit from that??

 

[JOHN.KOOL]

Before you label terrorists insignificant take a moment to think about the laws that have been passed in western countries in order to 'combat' terrorism, new powers given to certain individuals and losses in power and liberties suffered by others. Think about the wars that have been waged due to the actions of these terrorists, consider that soldiers are not the only westerners that have landed in these countries since conflict began. Considering those things then maybe they are not suppose to be a real threat, maybe destroying the west isn't their actual purpose because you are right, the terrorists are not benefiting from this but there those close to home that are.

 

[FaTaL]

I'm talking about muhammad in the middle east or africa breh...maybe i should have been more specific


no. How is it that they persist with this course of action when they dont really benefit from it? and if we agree on that, who really does?

are you talking about the princes of saudi arabia who funded the terrorists who caused 9/11?

i mean the usa attacked afghanistan, they should of attacked saudi arabia but they have oil

so

 

[Brown_Pride]

I mean do you expect to fight against countries with way more advanced military technology?? You go through all this trouble to live in secrecy, plan and make bullshyt videos to announce to the world who you have grievances with and what you are to do about it. So if not the terrorists then who really benefits from this shyt??
-They dont make the weapons
- The weapons they are being sold aren't powerful enough to be real threat

When a handful of people can literally change the course of the world, destabilize the greatest economies the world has ever seen, create wars in an entire region of the world, force it's enemies to alter their way of life (after saying that's what they wanted in the first fukin place) I'd hardly count that as insignificant.

Maybe you thought insignificant was actually the word significant? (it's ok broham i mix up words sometimes too).

 

[gho3st]

When a handful of people can literally change the course of the world, destabilize the greatest economies the world has ever seen, create wars in an entire region of the world, force it's enemies to alter their way of life (after saying that's what they wanted in the first fukin place) I'd hardly count that as insignificant.

Maybe you thought insignificant was actually the word significant? (it's ok broham i mix up words sometimes too).

let me put it in simpler terms: Do you think they realize that they are just pawns in this game?? That is why i said insignificant. To whoever benefits from their actions they might be valuable but terrorists dont really gain anything of note.

As far as altering way of life...if thats the endgame then

 

[Brown_Pride]

let me put it in simpler terms: Do you think they realize that they are just pawns in this game?? That is why i said insignificant. To whoever benefits from their actions they might be valuable but terrorists dont really gain anything of note.

As far as altering way of life...if thats the endgame then

Depends.
If the terrorist have achieved their objective then mission accomplished. Even at a smaller level the individual terrorist may have personal objectives. For instance you might see some random suicide bomber from Iraq as a shill being used by more powerful people in the M.E. What you might not know is that the individual had his family blown up and chalked up as collateral damage. Prior to being "used" he was around the world unable to reach out and strike any significant blow against the people who killed his family (Americans).

Along comes Al Q and they provide him with a means to reach out and touch someone. Now who is using who?

Insignificant? Not in the least man, not in the least.

 

[Truth200]

Before you label terrorists insignificant take a moment to think about the laws that have been passed in western countries in order to 'combat' terrorism, new powers given to certain individuals and losses in power and liberties suffered by others. Think about the wars that have been waged due to the actions of these terrorists, consider that soldiers are not the only westerners that have landed in these countries since conflict began. Considering those things then maybe they are not suppose to be a real threat, maybe destroying the west isn't their actual purpose because you are right, the terrorists are not benefiting from this but there those close to home that are.

Well said, plus they cause debt and waste taxpayers money on the military industrial complex.

 

[Ritzy Sharon]

I'm talking about muhammad in the middle east or africa breh...maybe i should have been more specific


no. How is it that they persist with this course of action when they dont really benefit from it? and if we agree on that, who really does?

but "Muhammed" does benefit from it because "Muhammed" has convinced himself that he's fighting God's war and martyrdom is the ultimate act of devotion and piety.

 

[gho3st]

but "Muhammed" does benefit from it because "Muhammed" has convinced himself that he's fighting God's war and martyrdom is the ultimate act of devotion and piety.

This is exactly why i asked the question. It is insignificant on a macro level. Once you get past the religion and admit how little of a threat they actually pose to developed countries, then it is fair to ask who really benefits the most from terrorism.

Well said, plus they cause debt and waste taxpayers money on the military industrial complex.

Military industrial complex was going to get the funds regardless . How you think they were going to protect their interests n maintain this unipolarity?

 

[Truth200]

I don't agree...