I don't have a problem with neoconservativism. What happened in Haiti surely isn't imperialism.
The policies in the 1990s was while she was first lady. The First Lady doesn't make policies.
Are you a Gaddafi supporter?
The Clinton foundation didn't profit off of Haiti. There's really no proof they ever did. Even the people referenced in Clinton cash have disagreed on the videos conclusions regarding Haiti.
So a White supremacist creating policy and introducing Laws in the US is not worse than someone who got Haiti aid, even if the results are disappointing? Or someone who helped dispose a corrupt leader commuting war crimes and rape against other Africans?
Key word here is WORSE.