Doesn't necessarily mean anything if MLB's rules on ownership isn't as stringent as others.The brother just agreed to buy another team. How can they not have cash
The point was that if he been didn't have the money and was knowledgeable at the time that the amount of money he being quoted at was schadenfreude, it makes sense to just say fukk it and get what you can out of it ASAPNot really. He’s basically spent the maximum amount of money he could spend on this team. But if he’s willing to spend this recklessly to produce a mediocre product, that’s probably how he runs his finances in general.
You just have to make it look like you have the money there at the time they check. And even then who knows what it really needs to look like.Doesn't the league do a deep dive into finances before even approving a sale? And don't you have to have a certain amount of money requirements to even begin negotiations to buy a team?
The NFL had problems with owners early on they have a clause where they require a certain percentage of liquidity if I remeember correctly.You just have to make it look like you have the money there at the time they check. And even then who knows what it really needs to look like.
At the same time Fertitta bought the Rockets he was getting sued by employees saying he was to broke to pay them![]()
Doesn't the league do a deep dive into finances before even approving a sale? And don't you have to have a certain amount of money requirements to even begin negotiations to buy a team?
Yes they do
If he is broke then he might have lost everything in his other bussinesses.
This is what happened to the maloofs in Sacramento if I remember correctly.
Happened to a NFL owner as well i believe the glazer family was severely cashs trapped for a while after their acquisition of man United.
Then we all know the Bengals largely were cash strapped and ran like a ghetto until Marvin Lewis cleaned them up
It seems they didn’t do their due diligence this time around. Major screw up on their part if true. They should even be aware of this being a riskDoesn't the league do a deep dive into finances before even approving a sale? And don't you have to have a certain amount of money requirements to even begin negotiations to buy a team?
If so, They must’ve made an exception when they allowed the sale of the Houston to Fertitta because he was not caked up like thatDoesn't the league do a deep dive into finances before even approving a sale? And don't you have to have a certain amount of money requirements to even begin negotiations to buy a team?
I doubt it. the suns as an organization is highly profitable and could eat that itself. I don't know why you would even think a corporate expense would be paid for by one of the owners.He’s probably getting crushed by the Suns almost $200 million per year in luxury tax. It doesn’t seem like the NBA takes into account if the potential owners can afford to pay exorbitant luxury taxes. Ishbia had to pledge all his shares in his company worth $4.6 billion to get a loan to buy 57% of the Suns at a $4 billion valuation, so his stake is worth $2.3 billion. His company’s shares have declined by 25% this year and with those types of loans when the shares fall below a certain value a margin call can kick in where he has to pledge more money or collateral. He might not have it after paying the luxury tax.
I think they did their due diligence, the market changed.It seems they didn’t do their due diligence this time around. Major screw up on their part if true. They should even be aware of this being a risk
What reason would he have to spread that?Now that I think about it I bet the “NBA sources” is someone close to Dan Gilbert.
Feels like a hit .
They don’t fukk with each other in the slightestWhat reason would he have to spread that?
I think the most likely source was that in stock circles UWM crashed hard last Monday and Pablo is just parroting that
I haven't t seen any lawsuits regarding vendors or employees not being paid, that's usually the red flag.