It's fukking simple when you read the rest of the post.
Someone can be technically the best at something but not be the most effective at any given time. That damn Win share stat people like to toss around is an example. In 05-06 no one woulda said that Dirk was the hands down BEST PLAYER in the NBA...you had nikkas like Kobe dropping 81, D-Wade in his prime, Nash won the MVP....but if you look at the stats Dirk was more EFFECTIVE at getting his team wins. Not the best, but the most effective. Look up the win shares if you think i'm bullshytting.
People say Mayweather is the most technically sound BOXER in the game, but people still say Manny would give him the beats...why? Because in his prime he was EFFECTIVE.
The best burger might be from Burger King, but it may not be as filling as one from 5 Guys.
Em in his prime might have the best technical skill-set of any rapper out....but he was not always the most potent or most lauded rapper in known circles.
There's more to being a CB than just knocking down passes.....you just exposed yourself as not understanding some of the finer points of sporting, friend.