1 seed, 2 seed, poppy seed, sesame seed..Doesn't matter to Henny Kang: #1 Celtics vs #2 Cavs
- Thread starter Illeye buckmatic
- Start date
Dr. Narcisse
Veteran
G-Zeus
G-Zeus Chrystler...the brehsident
JR aint been scoring too much lately.
I hope he don't get too bored
boston taking the 3 away
GoddamnyamanProf
Countdown to Armageddon
That idiot really just said Golden State proved they were the better team after going up 3-1, but when OKC went up 3-1 it was cause they were just messin aroundhow was GS playing around with OKC in the WCFs? They were legit getting handled until Durant started to apply the inside job/his normal choke procedure. Were the Cavs playing around with them in the finals?
and Thunder blew a 3-1 to Warriors, who blew a 3-1 to Cavs, but if Thunder didnt blow their 3-1 they def wouldve beaten the Cavs
That idiot really just said Golden State proved they were the better team after going up 3-1, but when OKC went up 3-1 it was cause they were just messin around
Fortunate Lee
Superstar
Let me reply for the breh rain man @Gil Scott-Heroin
but when OKC went up 3-1 it was cause they were just messin around
Brief Keef
Superstar
KRiLL (+)
Yo! Ho! Ho!
Gil Scott-Heroin
Veteran
That idiot really just said Golden State proved they were the better team after going up 3-1, but when OKC went up 3-1 it was cause they were just messin around
Why am I not surprised three of TheColi's biggest village idiots are hurting their rockbrains tryng to work this out?
I. The Warriors proved to be the better team when going up 3-1 with their full rotation in the Finals (this is even with Curry breaking down; limited mobility and notable swelling to his knee after games). Then Draymond got suspended, Bogut was injured and never returned, and Iggy was injured and was never the same for the rest of the series. If the Warriors had the same rotation from G1-G4, for the rest of the Finals, they would've gone on to win.
II. Prior to the Thunder series, the Warriors were still in regular season mode and were clearly not playing up to their potential. They got the harshest of reality checks when they ran into an OKC team who was firing on all cylinders after knocking off the 67-win Spurs in the previous round. Once their season was on the line they woke up and completely outclassed the Thunder who still had their full rotation. The Warriors didn't come back from being down 1-3 because the Thunder had injuries and a player suspended, they came back when OKC were at full-strength. Now this is important, the Warriors came back against the Thunder who still had their full rotation in G5-G7, the Cavs came back against the Warriors who were wounded with multiple injuries and had a player suspended in G5-G7.
III. If OKC were fortunate enough to play a wounded Warriors squad with a even more broken-down Curry, an injured Iggy (Iggy was the main one who limited Durant's impact in the back half of the WCF - without him the Warriors lose), an injured Bogut and Draymond suspended for a game - they would've beaten GS and made the Finals.
IV. If Draymond didn't get suspended, Iggy didn't get injured, Bogut didn't get injured and Curry didn't have a fukked knee, the Warriors likely close the Finals out against the Cavs 4-1 or 4-2. OKC basically faced a full-strength Warriors team and took them to seven games. If that same strengthed GS team played in the Finals, they likely would've beaten the Cavs 4-1 or 4-2. OKC were just unfortunate they didn't have the same luck.
V. OKC would've gone on to beat the Cavs due to having really nobody to guard Westbrook/Durant, superior rebounding (they were one of the greatest rebounding teams of the modern era), superior bigs and frontcourt scoring, and superior defensive role players. They proved they could go toe-to-toe with a full-strength* Warriors squad (*Curry's injury wasn't as bad in the WCF, as it was in the Finals), the Cavs didn't.
That idiot really just said Golden State proved they were the better team after going up 3-1, but when OKC went up 3-1 it was cause they were just messin around
Go 73-9 but fail to win because your mojo was lost for 1 game and your 8th best player got hurt.
Goat poster
KANG LIFE
Gil Scott-Heroin
Veteran
"The Warriors proved to be the better team when going up 3-1 with their full rotation in the Finals (this is even with Curry breaking down; limited mobility and notable swelling to his knee after games). Then Draymond got suspended, Bogut was injured and never returned, and Iggy was injured and was never the same for the rest of the series. If the Warriors had the same rotation from G1-G4, for the rest of the Finals, they would've gone on to win."
Go 73-9 but fail to win because your mojo was lost for 1 game and your 8th best player got hurt.
"If Draymond didn't get suspended, Iggy didn't get injured, Bogut didn't get injured and Curry didn't have a fukked knee, the Warriors likely close the Finals out against the Cavs 4-1 or 4-2"
GoddamnyamanProf
Countdown to Armageddon
No one cares, Kelly Anne. Go post it on reddit, Im sure theyd eat that garbage up.Why am I not surprised three of TheColi's biggest village idiots are hurting their rockbrains tryng to work this out?
I. The Warriors proved to be the better team when going up 3-1 with their full rotation in the Finals (this is even with Curry breaking down; limited mobility and notable swelling to his knee after games). Then Draymond got suspended, Bogut was injured and never returned, and Iggy was injured and was never the same for the rest of the series. If the Warriors had the same rotation from G1-G4, for the rest of the Finals, they would've gone on to win.
II. Prior to the Thunder series, the Warriors were still in regular season mode and were clearly not playing up to their potential. They got the harshest of reality checks when they ran into an OKC team who was firing on all cylinders after knocking off the 67-win Spurs in the previous round. Once their season was on the line they woke up and completely outclassed the Thunder who still had their full rotation. The Warriors didn't come back from being down 1-3 because the Thunder had injuries and a player suspended, they came back when OKC were at full-strength. Now this is important, the Warriors came back against the Thunder who still had their full rotation in G5-G7, the Cavs came back against the Warriors who were wounded with multiple injuries and had a player suspended in G5-G7.
III. If OKC were fortunate enough to play a wounded Warriors squad with a even more broken-down Curry, an injured Iggy (Iggy was the main one who limited Durant's impact in the back half of the WCF - without him the Warriors lose), an injured Bogut and Draymond suspended for a game - they would've beaten GS and made the Finals.
IV. If Draymond didn't get suspended, Iggy didn't get injured, Bogut didn't get injured and Curry didn't have a fukked knee, the Warriors likely close the Finals out against the Cavs 4-1 or 4-2. OKC basically faced a full-strength Warriors team and took them to seven games. If that same strengthed GS team played in the Finals, they likely would've beaten the Cavs 4-1 or 4-2. OKC were just unfortunate they didn't have the same luck.
V. OKC would've gone on to beat the Cavs due to having really nobody to guard Westbrook/Durant, superior rebounding (they were one of the greatest rebounding teams of the modern era), superior bigs and frontcourt scoring, and superior defensive role players. They proved they could go toe-to-toe with a full-strength* Warriors squad (*Curry's injury wasn't as bad in the WCF, as it was in the Finals), the Cavs didn't.