Apprentice
everybody in the world needa lul tim
This is a coli ass question lmao
This is a coli ass question lmao
Point is Bron finished out his Contracts it don’t matter how long or short he signed them for.. he finished them period.. These other nikkas deliberately signing long term deals with no intention to finish those contracts in that team
When your team builds correctly early in your career you don't need to leave.same Bron stans who this cry when people mention Steph rings without have to team hop
Just enjoy the games & amazing talent
Eh taking 1 year deals is a risk in itself, if he tore his acl or Achilles it would put him in a tuff situationThis tweet is ridiculous - it’s essentially saying the same thing THREE times (Nick Wright is a shameless ass Bron stan trying to make out they’re completely seperate from one another). And here’s the thing on why it isn’t any different, Bron purposefully signs short-term contracts, so he’s not contractually obliged to one team for an extensive period of time, which safeguards himself from situations like KD has found himself in.
I’m someone who doesn’t criticise anyone from making the best decision for themselves, but Bron has more power than any other entity in the league, so it’s easier for him to strong-arm a front office into making moves that benefit him (while simultaneously having more sway with the players) that nobody else is in a position to.
It doesn’t make Bron more or less respectable, it just makes him smarter and more shrewd.
So the answer to all that is to sign for more years and still waste time and years?This is only partially true. Towards the end of his contract Bron wouldn't commit to resigning so nobody wanted to sign there. Also make sense why Cleveland wouldn't go all out sacrificing the future to win immediately if Bron would possibly leave anyway. Stephen Jackson when he was all-star level mentioned that as part of the reason he was worried about going to Cleveland.
They also took swings and just missed with the Wally Szczerbiack, Shaq, Mo Williams, Antwawn Jamison, and Ben Wallace pickups who all made big money. So it's crazy to say the Cavs didn't try to improve or didn't spend money during Lebron's first tenure. They tried and just fukked up.
He made it imperative as a GM to do your fukn job correctly. Instead of the owner collecting all the extra $$$ a star player like LeBron brings to your team and your businesses and your other friends businesses, while putting in minimal effort in spending $$ to bring a legit team around him.
Some of y'all don't seem to understand this about Brons first run in Cleveland. Dan Gilbert was very happy spending moderately priced contracts on older role players and collecting $$$$$$ from Bron carrying the team without him spending the money he normally would have
Bulls were 2 wins away from having the best record in the East without Jordan, and he was in Chicago.
Kobe and Magic in LA.
Steph has like 4 all-star players and plays in the Bay.
Cavs is in the middle of nowhere and had nobody.
People need to start analyzing the basis for moves and also where and why people move.
It's easy to say this player stayed, while that didn't. But would the opposite also be true if those players switched roles.
Get off that nikka dikk. Nowhere did I say Lebron should've stayed or that I had a problem with him going to Miami. I was strictly talking about the narrative that the Cavs didn't spend money or try to improve doesn't match reality.So the answer to all that is to sign for more years and still waste time and years?
lets keep a cavs and lebron stays timeline
bulls get better
thunder gets the same team
bosh goes to the heat
cetilcs keep it going
on and on...
lebron is dom wilkins with better numbers that it