MusicConsulting

All Star
Joined
Mar 18, 2014
Messages
3,342
Reputation
1,605
Daps
10,163
Bernz sits down and takes the difficult questions, still saying he can't be president? :ohhh:

Bernz is going to a level that Mcgovern,Gore,Nader, DID NOT.



25 minutes....... Bernz, I agree w/ most of it. He covers the gun issue satisfactorily. It makes sense what he voted for. Bernz once again.... :blessed: I don't know about making Isis a top priority, we got some Jack Bauers in DC that will take advantage of that and make a whoooole mess out of that. Drones..... if we have em bomb any more civilians & high casualties.....weaponized drones may be out of the picture in the future. :francis:
 

MusicConsulting

All Star
Joined
Mar 18, 2014
Messages
3,342
Reputation
1,605
Daps
10,163
He is going to whoop Hilary's ass in the debate
:salute:We can only hope Robbie :leostare:

But Bernz doesnt want the tag to be seen as being mean to a senator of the opposite sex. :sas1:

I tell you one thing the fundraising numbers are about to spike up once these debates get cracking. Bernz going to get a ice cream flavor from Ben N Jerry's. It has to happen, :pachaha:


We can't let people keep passing the dollars away from working america, that's out. People should raise the hands and be like Cenk :whoa:
 

No1

Retired.
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
28,914
Reputation
4,589
Daps
63,487
Can anyone make a legitimate argument for why gun manufacturers should be held responsible for the crimes of an individual, especially one they didn't sell directly to? :dwillhuh:
The idea is that sometimes one individual action, but a sequence of actions caused an event to occur. Often, there are many people in a chain who could have prevented something from happening. It is why employers are often held liable for the actions for their employees. The employee is either acting on their behalf or they were negligent in hiring that person. When someone knowingly sells alcohol to a minor, and something happens, there is a strong possibility that may be held liable. The principle is the same, society has decided that a certain object is dangerous in the hands of a certain party and you were complicit in selling it to that party. You directly acted against public policy which is instituted specifically to prevent whatever unfortunate event occurs. You began a predictably dangerous chain of events in direct contravention of public policy. Someone who sells a gun to a person before performing an adequate background check, or to a seller who one knows does not engage in regular backgrounds is knowingly participating in a system that proliferates violence. AND you are in the best position to stop it.
 

¢apitali$t Migraine

Kneel Before Zod, Muthafücka
Joined
Aug 22, 2015
Messages
972
Reputation
-490
Daps
1,155
Reppin
§Ū₱ĒR√|££∆|Π
Can anyone make a legitimate argument for why gun manufacturers should be held responsible for the crimes of an individual, especially one they didn't sell directly to? :dwillhuh:
Yeah, that's a fukking crazy idea, bro. That's just a tool for disarmament of the population. Whenever manufacturers are held liable for the actions of a customer, the manufacturer becomes open to litigation. Lawsootz. In this case, it wouldn't make gats obsolete, it would make privatized gats obsolete. Chamilitary n law enforcement would be the only ones allowed to have em (because clearly, law enforcement's judgement in regards to lethal force is above question in this country, right?) cuz .gov would be the only ones allowed to approve manufacturers or biscuit manufacturing would become nationalized altogether.

It's a dumb fukking idea if ur campaigning for the 0val Office; there's this huge magical entity called The Silent Majority that motherfukkers online are forgetting about, and those cocksmokers vote as if they're brushing their teeth. They don't even think about it, there are no huge efforts to get conservatives and center-right neegas to register and vote. They had to damn near turn ∅bama into a 106 & Park Freestyle Fridays contestant to get the faggy millennials out the goddamn bed early enough to vote, and even then, that wasn't enough. Repubs had to have a retarded Vice Presidential candidate to make The Silent Majority slap the GOP's cock out of their mouths long enough not to put McCain in office.

U can be far right and win. U can't be far left and win unless ur opponent is super stupid/unsavory. The majority of this country does not subscribe to a far left philosophy, they are center right. Cuckold neegas on here think Sanders can win because they live in a bubble in regards to the electorate in Murica. U n ur friends like Bernie but u n ur friends either don't involve urself in grassroots efforts on the ground floor on behalf of candidates, don't vote in primaries, or don't even fukking vote, period. If Trump's numbers had begun to siggity siggity sig sag sag n plummet after that first debate, then Bizarro Kramer would have a legit shot. But Trump was a goddamn imbecile in that debate and his numbers improved.

So, the DNC is pulling out the chopper n letting Bizarro Kramer get enough of u Coachella SXSW attending cuckold neegas excited to run into the loving arms of Joey Crack. And o my rap brothers let me tell u, u may not give a Laurence Fishburne's pockmarked taint about Joey Crack now, but when he puts Warren on the ticket, that'll be the moment CMB takes over The Carter. Otherwise, Sanders is gonna have to reverse himself on pretty much everything that gets HL faggies wet about him right now to have a snowball's chance in hell at winning. If the DNC is dumb enough to let an avowed socialist take a serious stab at a run, then Jewish yarmulke God help u all, cuz once he loses, every politician that helped this fukkboy along the way is marked with the scarlet letter and their careers are fukking done, and you'll be left in a far right warmongering wiggity wasteland.
 
Last edited:

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
Bushed
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
302,087
Reputation
-34,036
Daps
611,648
Reppin
The Deep State
Yeah, that's a fukking crazy idea, bro. That's just a tool for disarmament of the population. Whenever manufacturers are held liable for the actions of a customer, the manufacturer becomes open to litigation. Lawsootz. In this case, it wouldn't make gats obsolete, it would make privatized gats obsolete. Chamilitary n law enforcement would be the only ones allowed to have em (because clearly, law enforcement's judgement in regards to lethal force is above question in this country, right?) cuz .gov would be the only ones allowed to approve manufacturers or biscuit manufacturing would become nationalized altogether.

It's a dumb fukking idea if ur campaigning for the 0val Office; there's this huge magical entity called The Silent Majority that motherfukkers online are forgetting about, and those cocksmokers vote as if they're brushing their teeth. They don't even think about it, there are no huge efforts to get conservatives and center-right neegas to register and vote. They had to damn near turn ∅bama into a 106 & Park Freestyle Fridays contestant to get the faggy millennials out the goddamn bed early enough to vote, and even then, that wasn't enough. Repubs had to have a retarded Vice Presidential candidate to make The Silent Majority slap the GOP's cock out of their mouths long enough not to put McCain in office.

U can be far right and win. U can't be far left and win unless ur opponent is super stupid/unsavory. The majority of this country does not subscribe to a far left philosophy, they are center right. Cuckold neegas on here think Sanders can win because they live in a bubble in regards to the electorate in Murica. U n ur friends like Bernie but u n ur friends either don't involve urself in grassroots efforts on the ground floor on behalf of candidates, don't vote in primaries, or don't even fukking vote, period. If Trump's numbers had begun to siggity siggity sig sag sag n plummet after that first debate, then Bizarro Kramer would have a legit shot. But Trump was a goddamn imbecile in that debate and his numbers improved.

So, the DNC is pulling out the chopper n letting Bizarro Kramer get enough of u Coachella SXSW attending cuckold neegas excited to run into the loving arms of Joey Crack. And o my rap brothers let me tell u, u may not give a Laurence Fishburne's pockmarked taint about Joey Crack now, but when he puts Warren on the ticket, that'll be the moment CMB takes over The Carter. Otherwise, Sanders is gonna have to reverse himself on pretty much everything that gets HL faggies wet about him right now to have a snowball's chance in hell at winning. If the DNC is dumb enough to let an avowed socialist take a serious stab at a run, then Jewish yarmulke God help u all, cuz once he loses, every politician that helped this fukkboy along the way is marked with the scarlet letter and their careers are fukking done, and you'll be left in a far right warmongering wiggity wasteland.
:wow:
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
Bushed
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
302,087
Reputation
-34,036
Daps
611,648
Reppin
The Deep State
Bernz sits down and takes the difficult questions, still saying he can't be president? :ohhh:

Bernz is going to a level that Mcgovern,Gore,Nader, DID NOT.



25 minutes....... Bernz, I agree w/ most of it. He covers the gun issue satisfactorily. It makes sense what he voted for. Bernz once again.... :blessed: I don't know about making Isis a top priority, we got some Jack Bauers in DC that will take advantage of that and make a whoooole mess out of that. Drones..... if we have em bomb any more civilians & high casualties.....weaponized drones may be out of the picture in the future. :francis:

He didn't have a lot to say outside of playing on people's anger and ignorance of other issues.

Very sparse on policy solutions.

At least Hilary has bullet points in her plans. :manny:
 
Top