that stifles the freedom of africans?Great
It’s our job to prevent foreign policy that sanctions this
that stifles the freedom of africans?Great
It’s our job to prevent foreign policy that sanctions this
What laws do you want to see in Ghana in regards to LGBT issues?
Nor your interrogationsGive a valid response to my initial post (#31), I'm not interested in your false dilemma
2k gdp per capita africa needs to focus on economic freedoms not social malaises that you pretend are freedomsthat stifles the freedom of africans?
You're trying semantic nonsense because you can't morally defend oppresssion of minorities in the face of starvation and other failings of the Ghanaian government. You act as if this policy exists in a vacuum.You're making assertions, not arguments
I never claimed that I'd "rather" see anything, that your strawman. You don't understand basic argumentation.
I stated I have no problem with the State making anti-lbgt laws and I gave brief justifications.
What laws do you want to see in Ghana in regards to LGBT issues?Nor your interrogations
which is why they spend valuable time on this law?2k gdp per capita africa needs to focus on economic freedoms not social malaises that you pretend are freedoms
No, I'm making an actual argumentYou're trying semantic nonsense
Thieves and robbers are a minorityyou can't morally defend oppresssion of minorities
Multiple policies for multiple issues. The topic of this thread is the lbgt policy which I have no problem within the face of starvation and other failings of the Ghanaian government. You act as if this policy exists in a vacuum.
I never made any priority claims. You're not justifying your moral claimsA government that prioritizes jailing minority groups over the basic necessities of its people is even less effective to the point it becomes a moral issue. That justifies condemnation.
I would have had to make a priority claim for this to be trueMy statement was not a strawman, it was simply following your logic to its conclusion.
If research and education shows that certain behaviors are unhealthy, then prevent them from happening to begin withAlso, your justifications are bunk. Health issues are resolved through research and education, not oppression.
You don't care about "women's spaces and autonomy."@Alan Johnson and @AquaCityBoy need to read this over and over again.
We are not anti-LGB. @the cac mamba and I support the gay community.
However, transgenderism isn’t substantiated, isn’t supported by medical or scientific (or frankly philosophical) evidence/legitimacy, and lastly impacts actual women’s spaces and autonomy.
Well, that 'country' (recognized as a sovereign state in 1948) has the military and economic might/assistance of the US & UK, so their rules is ambiguous since they need weapons from those countries. Ghana has no such assistance.I don't understand the 'their country their rules', while crying about what Israelis do in retaliation to October 7th.
fukk you and @the cac mamba. Don't tag me in your posts, you filthy fukking animal.@Alan Johnson and @AquaCityBoy need to read this over and over again.
We are not anti-LGB. @the cac mamba and I support the gay community.
However, transgenderism isn’t substantiated, isn’t supported by medical or scientific (or frankly philosophical) evidence/legitimacy, and lastly impacts actual women’s spaces and autonomy.
This entire thread debunks your claims that I’m a homophobe. Dont run now, pússy.fukk you and @the cac mamba. Don't tag me in your posts, you filthy fukking animal.
You're a bigot. You have no problem joining hands with the same bigots who spread these backwards laws around the world. You only make these thread to give yourself cover w/e it is rightfully pointed out that you. are. a. bigot.This entire thread debunks your claims that I’m a homophobe. Dont run now, pússy.![]()
Based on what evidence? Certainly its not in this threadYou're a bigot.
Show me once where I did thatYou have no problem joining hands with the same bigots who spread these backwards laws around the world.
What does calling me a bigot do when you have evidence that I do in fact support the LGB community?You only make these thread to give yourself cover w/e it is rightfully pointed out that you. are. a. bigot.
Yes. Your argument is that oppression of homosexuals is justified because you believe homosexuality is unhealthy (something you haven't supported with evidence) in spite of mass starvation and other widespread failings.No, I'm making an actual argument
Theivery and robbery are actions, actions by individuals that directly harm other individuals and their property. Homosexuals are harming noone by virtue of being homosexual or speaking out against their oppression.Thieves and robbers are a minority
You don't have to. Priority is part of the context the law was drafted in. It doesn't exist in a vacuum. Oppressing a minority group that has not harmed anyone is immoral.I never made any priority claims. You're not justifying your moral claims
But there is no policy being passed to address those issues, they passed one to address gays. Hence, my statement that they are prioritizing oppression over the other issues.Multiple policies for multiple issues. The topic of this thread is the lbgt policy which I have no problem with
It doesn't matter if you're making the claim. The context exists, you just choose to ignore it.I would have had to make a priority claim for this to be true
Throwing people in jail is not prevention, it's punishment. Education leads to prevention. Also, bad water and lack of food are significantly unhealthier for the people as a whole than homosexuality, so again, they should be higher priority for government.If research and education shows that certain behaviors are unhealthy, then prevent them from happening to begin with