Male - male homosexuals have increased risk of diseases. Not just STIs, but also digestive and excretory health issue.
Female - female relationships are the most prone to inter-partner violence. They are also unstable in terms of longevity
Transsexuals have a plethora of health and psychological issues. They are at extremely high risk of suicide, whether pre-op or post-op.
None of this happens in a personal vacuum, and there's no history of the lbgt keeping their filth "in the privacy of their homes," it effects society, they seem to feel the need to proliferate their filth. Neither of these proclivities are conductive to stable families. Stable families are necessary for a stable civilization.
Homosexuality and transgenderism is an act that harms the individual and disrupts the stability of a society.
No you just insist on inserting the x y z issues into the conversation. One can talk about the merits of this thread topic without introducing this false dilemma or trying to prioritize external issues. I'm only speaking on this one issue
The legality of lbgt is not a causation for a society's standard of living. This is a ridiculous question.
These are still external topics and issues to what this thread is about
You're concocting this necessary "context" in your own mind
Punishment is implemented to prevent further violations. Education can also do this, it's not either or.
Red herring, stay on topic
This is stupid
The thread topic is the law. I have not only addressed why the law is wrong on its own merits (the immorality of government jailing those who have not harmed another individual), I addressed the immorality of government prioritizing oppression over food, water, and infrastructure failure. You continue to ignore the context of the law. It didn't get passed in a vacuum.
The negative health effects of stds can be remedied by education and medicine. Draconian punishments only make the problem worse, see drug/alcohol prohibition.
Homosexuality is not an act, it's a sexual orientation. Sexual behaviors with potential harm are not exclusive to homosexuals.
Acceptance of lgbt correlates with a higher standard of living. There is no evidence that draconian crackdowns will improve Ghana's standard of living. It will also objectively make things worse for gay Ghanains and anyone gay who travels to Ghana. This also makes the law immoral.
Again, you call contex a red herring to avoid addressing it.
You don't like when your logic is taken to its natural conclusion. You believe that if something is harmful to society, it deserves punishment. Those who allow hunger to persist without remedy are harming society. Therefore, according to your logic, they deserve punishment.
Y'all authoritarians are something else, especially the ones that live in the West.