Gospel singer Kim Burrell attacked after preaching sermon on the SIN of homosexuality

[shhh-kull & bones]

Really the same as Malcolm X's rebuke of his brand of white acceptance and integrationism
Instead of talking about black self sufficiency, arguing for simply legal egalitarianism, but maintaining black independence economically and educationally, the Rustins of the world rejected this because they didn't get the white love and acceptance they wanted.

That need for white acceptance in all factors of life, is built off and feeds into the concept of white supremacy and black inferiority. So to me the integrationist argument was an inherent white supremacist argument.

Never really looked at Baldwin, but looking at his stances compared to Malcolm in the video posted below, I would say he would be in the same camp as Rustin.

Thats the short end of it, longer breakdown from Malcolm himself.

...thanks for that post breh

its funny how the same fakkitized talking points that filthy, dusty rustin dude was spewing is the same talking points that can be found on the coli today

just sad

everything the great Malcom was saying was pure truth

Our people have a way of not heeding the words of the great ones but settling for the weak diatribe of the inferior fakkitized negro leaders

that morally banrupt piece of fakkitized junk rustin had no business on the same stage as the great Malcom

that filthy clown maggot rustin looks and sounds just like cornel west...weak inept
cac-supremacy errand boys

thats why our people going through it

and these fakkitized coli coke-heads dont have the slightest clue out here...to busy living/promoting
destructive madness

 

[southpawstyle]

Does dragonball z count as anime?


I think she is against the sin of homosexuality and not the sinner, homosexual


The Bible is very much against homosexuality so I don't understand how homosexuals practice Christianity. We all are sinners but you can't LIVE in sin. It does seem like they are trying to corrupt the church. That's just my opinion tho

Define "very much against". How many times does the bible reference homosexuality compared to other sins that people ignore?

Also, @Jamal99 Im curious, what is more offensive to you- a man having non consensual sex with a woman, or two men having consensual sex? Legit question.

 

[shhh-kull & bones]

Define "very much against". How many times does the bible reference homosexuality compared to other sins that people ignore?

Also, @Jamal99 Im curious, what is more offensive to you- a man having non consensual sex with a woman, or two men having consensual sex? Legit question.

two men can not have 'SEX'
you damn fool

consentual or not that shyt is fakkitry

I swear the coli is now a cesspool of foggatized clown nikkas

 

[southpawstyle]

two men can not have 'SEX'
you damn fool

consentual or not that shyt is fakkitry

I swear the coli is now a cesspool of foggatized clown nikkas

Answer the question. What is more offensive to you? A man raping a woman or two dudes putting their dikks in their butts?

 

[Menelik II]

That door closed quick

 

[southpawstyle]

Jokes on you breh. Im a white reptilian pansexual sent by the Illuminati to promote Ru Pauls drag race and Techno music.

 

[iamduval]

Define "very much against". How many times does the bible reference homosexuality compared to other sins that people ignore?

Also, @Jamal99 Im curious, what is more offensive to you- a man having non consensual sex with a woman, or two men having consensual sex? Legit question.

First question:
An abomination, detestable, punishable by death. There is no sin greater or worse than another. That's also made clear.


2nd question:
Both are acts of sexual immorality. I don't see where you're going with that..

 

[shhh-kull & bones]

Answer the question. What is more offensive to you? A man raping a woman or two dudes putting their dikks in their butts?

fukk you and these fakkit questions

dusty clown ass nikka

go eat a dikk and marry it too


you aint slick or fooling anybody filthy cac-fagggot troll

go promote your soulless life style to your cac buddies on st0rmfr0nt dusty weirdo

 

[88m3]

this thread

 

[shhh-kull & bones]

First question:
An abomination, detestable, punishable by death. There is no sin greater or worse than another. That's also made clear.


2nd question:
Both are acts of sexual immorality. I don't see where you're going with that..

its these weirdos new tactic;

use faulty moralisty logic to rationalize or justify immorality

its their desperate attemp at conning people into comtemplating/accept reprehensible nonsense as valid

these thirsty trolls of abomination/genocidal politics are trying to make it seem moral to be a deviant or pervert

...just crazy, these new coli devils are something else

 

[Menelik II]

thats a good thing cause she dont need to be on no damn fakkitized tv show to get ahead

only a fakkitized c00n with no pride or sense of self worth would see this as a lost for her

it says alot that bkack folks nowadays see chillin with some cac dyke on some crappy tv show is a gateway to something or somewhere special

damn how the mighty have fallen

yall fakkitized dudes cant really be out here complaining about cac-supremacy if you need cac-dykes to validate your talents or existence

we as a people have to break out of these traps

fakkitry is the basis/foundation of cac-supremacy

you cant bang againts one and be down/cool with the other

you just cant do it

It is a loss for her though, and she sees it that way. She wanted to be on the show , now she has lost that exposure, been shown to be a hypocrite going on there in the first place, and has had to apologize.

This was not part of her New Years plans

 

[ADevilYouKhow]

Answer the question. What is more offensive to you? A man raping a woman or two dudes putting their dikks in their butts?

Doesn't the Bible praise both actions?

 

[Menelik II]

again it should not be perceived as any type a lost by her or anyone of our people

this appetite for queer-cac validation needs to be deaded

back in the day we at least had shyt like soulltrain and opollo etc... you know shyt we did to validate ourselves

we need to start validating our own instead of compromising our values
just to get some lime

ironically she did get exposure or 'exposed'...its just not the kind of exposure she was expecting

shyt like that will happens when dealin with cac-devils..sometimes what you get is usually what you dont expect

It's not just white validation though. It's that she exposed herself as a 2 faced hypocrite who loves the attention, connecting with ocean and degeneris, whilst holding onto Old Testament law and ideology. She took an L with the black community too.

 

[shhh-kull & bones]

again it should not be perceived as any type a lost by her or anyone of our people

this appetite for queer-cac validation needs to be deaded

back in the day we at least had shyt like soulltrain and opollo etc... you know shyt we did to validate ourselves

we need to start validating our own instead of compromising our values
just to get some lime

ironically she did get exposure or 'exposed'...its just not the kind of exposure she was expecting

shyt like that will happens when dealin with cac-devils..sometimes what you get is usually what you dont expect

queer-cac validation

 

[shhh-kull & bones]

It's not just white validation though. It's that she exposed herself as a 2 faced hypocrite who loves the attention, connecting with ocean and degeneris, whilst holding onto Old Testament law and ideology. She took an L with the black community too.

come on breh every artist needs attention even humble ones

does that mean she gotta compromise her values to not be seen as a hypocrite

if she truely doesnt want to subscribe to fakkitry then thats her right

the problem is these devious queers make it very difficult to side step them cause of their manipulation and control of various industries like the movie and music industries...these queers have been the illegitimate gate keepers of those places for a while now

its a catch 22/damn if you do damn if you dont situation out here with these queers

keeping their company is a sure L
not wanting keep their company can also affect your lively hood

this will not end well for society
there will be a war

and the first battle is to get negros out here to stop lusting after queer cac validation