Roland Coltrane
Superstar
Kerr is in as a coach
Dray getting in, this basketball HOF lets anyone in.Who do you think gets in aside from Steph, KD, and Klay?
I'd say four. Draymond has an olympic medal, key to the success of a dynasty that won three titles in five years. Arguably the 2nd best player on a 73 win team. Has a DPOY. Should be remembered as one of the better defenders of his time. Had a good college career. Who knows what he adds to that once the Warriors regroup in the future.
A lot of the writers love Draymond so I think he ends up getting in even though I don't think personally that he's a HOF.
Basketball HoF has pretty low standards. I'll take the over
Klay Dray Steph KD all are in. Over
Dray getting in, this basketball HOF lets anyone in.
Kerr is in as a coach
Draymond is not a hall of gamer just stop
But don’t you agree that those accolades are tied to playing with all-time great players? The question for me was how does he look without those great players. The resounding answer is that he looks very very average. You think him playing above average defense warrants being a HOFer?
THIS would be the argument to support his HOF candidacy. And for the most part, I don’t disagree with your assessment. It just doesn’t amount to a HOF career imo. I’m not persuaded he should be in the HOF next to legit greats like Charles Barkley, Karl Malone, and Tim Duncan. Draymond has been the perfect fit for GSW because the superstar talent he’s had the opportunity to play with compliments what he does well: play good team defense and facilitate team offense that gets the ball in the hands of these amazing shooters/scorers. I won’t argue that he hasn’t had great moments and stretches of great play. I won’t argue that he wasn’t a huge contributor to GSW’s team success either. When it’s all said and done, though, I can’t in good conscience say that he’s HOF-worthy especially when he’s putting up the dud that is this season. He’s in his prime and just playing ok. When MJ retired the first time Scottie stepped up and still had the Bulls in position. That’s simplifying Draymond’s situation but can’t nobody look at what he’s doing and tell me oh yeah he still looks like anything resembling a great player let alone a HOFer. That shyt matters. He’s only 29.well...if you think Draymond is just an above average defender then there's no convincing you of his HOF candidacy. The people who will vote for Draymond will remember him as one of the better defenders of the era and for what he contributed to the greatest team of the era. The usual lasting impression from the Warriors is that they changed the way teams approach perimeter shooting. But teams also tried to mimic the Warriors approach to small ball lineups and Draymond was key to that. The adjustment made by Kerr to swing the 2015 Finals wasn't just to start Iggy, but to put Draymond at center.
The voters probably won't care about him looking average without stars around him when they never thought he could carry a team as a #1 option to begin with. He is valued for his ability to contribute star level value to a team that is already good, and then in the postseason tends raise his level of play even higher.
Draymond's best season was before KD, with Thompson and Curry. 73 win season. Makes 2nd team All NBA. I see one all time great player there, and Draymond does a lot to help Curry thrive on the court. It's pretty much forgotten what he did when Curry was injured vs Houston and Portland. No all time great players on the court. He and Thompson co-anchoring a playoff team, thriving.
THIS would be the argument to support his HOF candidacy. And for the most part, I don’t disagree with your assessment. It just doesn’t amount to a HOF career imo. I’m not persuaded he should be in the HOF next to legit greats like Charles Barkley, Karl Malone, and Tim Duncan. Draymond has been the perfect fit for GSW because the superstar talent he’s had the opportunity to play with compliments what he does well: play good team defense and facilitate team offense that gets the ball in the hands of these amazing shooters/scorers. I won’t argue that he hasn’t had great moments and stretches of great play. I won’t argue that he wasn’t a huge contributor to GSW’s team success either. When it’s all said and done, though, I can’t in good conscience say that he’s HOF-worthy especially when he’s putting up the dud that is this season. He’s in his prime and just playing ok. When MJ retired the first time Scottie stepped up and still had the Bulls in position. That’s simplifying Draymond’s situation but can’t nobody look at what he’s doing and tell me oh yeah he still looks like a HOFer. That shyt matters. He’s only 29.
But don’t you agree that those accolades are tied to playing with all-time great players? The question for me was how does he look without those great players. The resounding answer is that he looks very very average. You think him playing above average defense warrants being a HOFer?
I know the basketball HOF has low standards but you don’t think voters are going to look at him for what he’s doing this year and come away with the conclusion that he’s just not a HOFer. He’s averaging a double in no category. Like Charles said, he’s got a triple single. THAT’S a HOFer??
What do you make of this season since he hasn’t been surrounded by superstars? This year, he’s averaging 8.5 points, 6.4 boards, and 6.2 assists. As The MAN! That’s a HOFer to you?