the cac mamba
Veteran
of course the Englishman inserts himself into the conversation. go bow to meghan markle, you fukkin dollar cone
Heritage Foundation unveils “Project 2025” to dismantle the U.S. federal government in Trump’s second term
- Thread starter FAH1223
- Start date
the cac mamba
Veteran
why the fuxk are you even here? you're english
you live 4,000 miles awaygo curtsy for megan markle, you fukkin subject
Methinks the cac doth protest too much.why the fuxk are you even here? you're english
go curtsy for megan markle, you fukkin subject
At least you didn't mention trannies for a couple of posts.
Congrats. Lol.
You know we have this discussion over and over. I am at least black, which gives me more rights to post on this forum that you will ever have.
the cac mamba
Veteran
Lol. Maybe if I was white. But remember, that's you.you're the austin powers of the forum
you live in england
Voice of Reason
Veteran
Pathetic bootlicker sambo
Voice of Reason
Veteran
He’s not dumb he’s just exposing himself @DEAD7 is dumb for being a Black Libertarian acting like Black people will fair well in such a society at this point. @the cac mamba is a bigoted piece of shyt cac that wants to go back to a society that will reinforce white supremacy.
A history reminder that has been quietly swept under the carpet. There may be old threads on this. I think there's a coli member with a smedley butler handle.
The Business Plot (also called the Wall Street Putsch and The White House Putsch) was a political conspiracy in 1933, in the United States, to overthrow the government of President Franklin D. Roosevelt and install Smedley Butler as dictator. Retired Marine Corps Major General Smedley Butler asserted that wealthy businessmen were plotting to create a fascist veterans' organization with Butler as its leader and use it in a coup d'état to overthrow Roosevelt. In 1934, Butler testified under oath before the United States House of Representatives Special Committee on Un-American Activities (the "McCormack–dikkstein Committee") on these revelations. Although no one was prosecuted, the congressional committee final report said, "there is no question that these attempts were discussed, were planned, and might have been placed in execution when and if the financial backers deemed it expedient."
The plot planned to install Brigadier General Smedley Butler as dictator of the United States.
Early in the committee's gathering of testimony most major news media dismissed the plot, with a New York Times editorial characterizing it as a "gigantic hoax".[5] When the committee's final report was released, the Times said the committee "purported to report that a two-month investigation had convinced it that General Butler's story of a Fascist march on Washington was alarmingly true" and "... also alleged that definite proof had been found that the much publicized Fascist march on Washington, which was to have been led by Major Gen. Smedley D. Butler, retired, according to testimony at a hearing, was actually contemplated".[6] The individuals involved all denied the existence of a plot.
While historians have questioned whether a coup was actually close to execution, most agree that some sort of "wild scheme" was contemplated and discussed.
___________________________________
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
The Business Plot (also called the Wall Street Putsch and The White House Putsch) was a political conspiracy in 1933, in the United States, to overthrow the government of President Franklin D. Roosevelt and install Smedley Butler as dictator. Retired Marine Corps Major General Smedley Butler asserted that wealthy businessmen were plotting to create a fascist veterans' organization with Butler as its leader and use it in a coup d'état to overthrow Roosevelt. In 1934, Butler testified under oath before the United States House of Representatives Special Committee on Un-American Activities (the "McCormack–dikkstein Committee") on these revelations. Although no one was prosecuted, the congressional committee final report said, "there is no question that these attempts were discussed, were planned, and might have been placed in execution when and if the financial backers deemed it expedient."
The plot planned to install Brigadier General Smedley Butler as dictator of the United States.
Early in the committee's gathering of testimony most major news media dismissed the plot, with a New York Times editorial characterizing it as a "gigantic hoax".[5] When the committee's final report was released, the Times said the committee "purported to report that a two-month investigation had convinced it that General Butler's story of a Fascist march on Washington was alarmingly true" and "... also alleged that definite proof had been found that the much publicized Fascist march on Washington, which was to have been led by Major Gen. Smedley D. Butler, retired, according to testimony at a hearing, was actually contemplated".[6] The individuals involved all denied the existence of a plot.
While historians have questioned whether a coup was actually close to execution, most agree that some sort of "wild scheme" was contemplated and discussed.
___________________________________
Prescott Bush
In July 2007, a BBC investigation reported that Prescott Bush, father of U.S. President George H. W. Bush and grandfather of then-president George W. Bush, was to have been a "key liaison" between the 1933 Business Plotters and the newly emerged Nazi regime in Germany, although this has been disputed by Jonathan Katz as a misconception caused by a clerical research error. According to Katz, "Prescott Bush was too involved with the actual Nazis to be involved with something that was so home grown as the business plot."
Business Plot - Wikipedia
Smedley Butler - Wikipedia
Holy fukk, did you bring your obsession with transgender into yet another thread
I've said that I'm not down with their agenda, but I also have zero input on what Jenner says. WTF does that have to do with Trump's potential power over the executive branch?
Do you argue like this because you know you're too stupid to engage in a legitimate debate? Or are you too stupid to know you're stupid, and you actually think this isn't embarrassing?
Last edited:
A history reminder that has been quietly swept under the carpet. There may be old threads on this. I think there's a coli member with a smedley butler handle.
The Business Plot (also called the Wall Street Putsch and The White House Putsch) was a political conspiracy in 1933, in the United States, to overthrow the government of President Franklin D. Roosevelt and install Smedley Butler as dictator. Retired Marine Corps Major General Smedley Butler asserted that wealthy businessmen were plotting to create a fascist veterans' organization with Butler as its leader and use it in a coup d'état to overthrow Roosevelt. In 1934, Butler testified under oath before the United States House of Representatives Special Committee on Un-American Activities (the "McCormack–dikkstein Committee") on these revelations. Although no one was prosecuted, the congressional committee final report said, "there is no question that these attempts were discussed, were planned, and might have been placed in execution when and if the financial backers deemed it expedient."
The plot planned to install Brigadier General Smedley Butler as dictator of the United States.
Early in the committee's gathering of testimony most major news media dismissed the plot, with a New York Times editorial characterizing it as a "gigantic hoax".[5] When the committee's final report was released, the Times said the committee "purported to report that a two-month investigation had convinced it that General Butler's story of a Fascist march on Washington was alarmingly true" and "... also alleged that definite proof had been found that the much publicized Fascist march on Washington, which was to have been led by Major Gen. Smedley D. Butler, retired, according to testimony at a hearing, was actually contemplated".[6] The individuals involved all denied the existence of a plot.
While historians have questioned whether a coup was actually close to execution, most agree that some sort of "wild scheme" was contemplated and discussed.
___________________________________
Prescott Bush
In July 2007, a BBC investigation reported that Prescott Bush, father of U.S. President George H. W. Bush and grandfather of then-president George W. Bush, was to have been a "key liaison" between the 1933 Business Plotters and the newly emerged Nazi regime in Germany, although this has been disputed by Jonathan Katz as a misconception caused by a clerical research error. According to Katz, "Prescott Bush was too involved with the actual Nazis to be involved with something that was so home grown as the business plot."
Business Plot - Wikipedia
Smedley Butler - Wikipedia
That's a wild story that I had never heard before. If I would have picked any year for such a plot to emerge, though, that would have been the one.
Secure Da Bag
Veteran
Former Governor Jeb Bush was a member of one of these right wing foundations and did some real phuckery in the 2000 Florida presidential vote to get the Supreme Court to select his brother that almost totally phucked up the country during his 2 terms in office. Then came 9/11/2001, then came the wars in the Middle East perhaps costing trillions. Billions of dollars of military gear and installations were left behind in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Today both major political parties are repeating the spending in Ukraine. The political puppet masters are in total control.
"if credentials are not the criteria"
ill
Superstar
Is there a cliff notes version of the rule changes they are proposing? The heritage.com link is down right now.
All i found was this on the Project 2025 site.
Disagree with #3. DoE doesn't need to be broken up but def needs to be reformed. We've fallen really far behind the rest of the world in eduction.
From the Times article:
Neutral on the FTC and FCC argument. I don't think the President needs to have power over these agencies but at the same time these agencies give in to lobbyists so maybe it'll be an ok counter influence.
Impounding funds sounds sketch and seems it could easily go against the will of the people.
100% on board with stripping employment protections from lazy ass government workers. Being tenured in government is a joke and IMO is a major reason for government inefficiency and competency.
Also on board with hunting down political intelligence agents. They are a threat to the public interest and undermine the will of the people.
From the Guardian article:
I already know this will be an unpopular thought but investing in gas infrastructure is important and critical for the next few decades. Fossil fuels aren't going anywhere - even if you eliminate them from cars, petroleum products are still heavily used in everything else that we use. This green rush is really fukking expensive and right now its a bit of a lie. Your electric Tesla is still getting its power from fossil fuel plants. Until we go full nuclear, "green" energy is disingenuous. With the rise of BRICS, which controls a large portion of the oil market, we NEED to have a counter - and thats domestic production. Besides economic reasons, this is a major security issue if BRICS ever goes up against us. Most Americans cannot afford a Tesla, cannot afford a $3000 charging station at their house, cannot afford a 20k battery replacement, etc. Going green is very expensive and prices out a majority of Americans. Paying premiums for clean energy is driving up costs across the board and during a time of high inflation, I don't think that benefits most Americans. Investing in gas infrastructure, opening up safe drilling platforms, and rebuilding our national stockpile would do far more wonders for the average American and lowering gas prices would be a major boost to reviving our economy right now.
All i found was this on the Project 2025 site.
Disagree with #3. DoE doesn't need to be broken up but def needs to be reformed. We've fallen really far behind the rest of the world in eduction.
From the Times article:
Neutral on the FTC and FCC argument. I don't think the President needs to have power over these agencies but at the same time these agencies give in to lobbyists so maybe it'll be an ok counter influence.
Impounding funds sounds sketch and seems it could easily go against the will of the people.
100% on board with stripping employment protections from lazy ass government workers. Being tenured in government is a joke and IMO is a major reason for government inefficiency and competency.
Also on board with hunting down political intelligence agents. They are a threat to the public interest and undermine the will of the people.
From the Guardian article:
I already know this will be an unpopular thought but investing in gas infrastructure is important and critical for the next few decades. Fossil fuels aren't going anywhere - even if you eliminate them from cars, petroleum products are still heavily used in everything else that we use. This green rush is really fukking expensive and right now its a bit of a lie. Your electric Tesla is still getting its power from fossil fuel plants. Until we go full nuclear, "green" energy is disingenuous. With the rise of BRICS, which controls a large portion of the oil market, we NEED to have a counter - and thats domestic production. Besides economic reasons, this is a major security issue if BRICS ever goes up against us. Most Americans cannot afford a Tesla, cannot afford a $3000 charging station at their house, cannot afford a 20k battery replacement, etc. Going green is very expensive and prices out a majority of Americans. Paying premiums for clean energy is driving up costs across the board and during a time of high inflation, I don't think that benefits most Americans. Investing in gas infrastructure, opening up safe drilling platforms, and rebuilding our national stockpile would do far more wonders for the average American and lowering gas prices would be a major boost to reviving our economy right now.
@Rhakim wasn’t lying
@the cac mamba bringing trannies up whenever y’all debate.lol
I remember reading your post the other day saying such about him.
