Gimini00
Bytch Off The Bando
You said it best, they represent the 99%, they are not part of the 99%. And i never said all the 1% was evil, there are few of them who fight for the rest of the population.
How Does A MINORITY Have "SO MUCH CONTROL "Over A MAJORITY? (Why Isn't This CALLED OUT?)
- Thread starter SirReginald
- Start date
You said it best, they represent the 99%, they are not part of the 99%. And i never said all the 1% was evil, there are few of them who fight for the rest of the population.
AlainLocke
Banned
Because capitalism has a system of
"He who takes the biggest risks...have the most control..."
And the inverse of that...well you know...the rest of us not having control...
"He who takes the biggest risks...have the most control..."
And the inverse of that...well you know...the rest of us not having control...
So, Malcolm or MLK was apart of the 1%
What 1% will fight for the people? Maybe a small small few.
David_TheMan
Banned
How do you explain the control of nations that are socialist or communist by the elite?
it isn't economics IMHO
I've never worked a day in my life and never will.
Several people, some of whom may not be considered leaders.
Same as before. Having a lot of money, playing games with money, and ownership doesn't make individuals leaders. Maybe that's leadership to you...
MrPentatonic
Superstar
Whats you guys definition of the 1%?
Gimini00
Bytch Off The Bando
So, Malcolm or MLK was apart of the 1%
These two got shot, like Che, like everyone who tried to bring the 1% down. I never said there wouldn't be people who'll try to fight them, but they'll lose at the end. Either they'll try to buy you and try to control you or they'll kill you.
AlainLocke
Banned
It is economics.
A communism is the final stage of an economy...communism creates a classless nation. A nation where people only take what they need.
A nation that calls itself communist is planning to achieve a communist nation...a nation without classes.
Marx said that the human economy has to go through stages, there's the slave state, the feudal state, the capitalist society and there's communism.
Each stage of the human economy is destroyed by it's own contradictions. Marx believed that only advanced capitalist societies can achieve communism because they have enough wealth and technology to do so.
In communist nations like Vietnam and China...capitalist activity is allowed to build the factors of production. Capitalism is good at building the wealth of a nation, but then it causes extreme inequality. Vietnam and China much rather allow capitalist activity than remind in squalor.
China is planning on achieving communism like 100 years from now. Vietnam is one of the fastest growing economies in the world right now and probably 150 years away from communism.
Communist countries are about what they could be, not what it is.
True, but you did say there's never been a leader who wasn't of the 99%. Also, I know you are a threat to them, but I was just making a point.
Gimini00
Bytch Off The Bando
That's how greed came along of most nations besides a fewthe white man always came with
a hand extended in peace with a knife/gun
behind his back.
after that it's murder/rape/pillage
closing out with the white jesus/christianity
coup de grace.
EXACTLY breh EXACTLY
David_TheMan
Banned
)
We'll ignore that for now and look at communism in action. Vietnam, North Korea, China, USSR all had ruling elites who lived better than the masses, controlled the mechinations of the state, and formed an elite. They in no way were any different than the US in political structure, Stalin, Mao, Kim Il Sung, Ho Chi Minh, all revered and put over the masses as elite and the various politburos over the masses.
So you can appeal to some faith, but 'm talking reality.
You see the same in Rome which wasn't capitalist, you see the same in writing about Mayans and Inca, you saw it in the bible with the jewish tribes, you saw it ancient Egypt, Babylon, Assyria, Persia, Macedonia and etc.
An elite class always rises over the masses
You are talking about Marx, a noted racist, (Karl Marx: Communist leader and blatant racist) with the same admiration a devout religious person talks about their religious leader. Marx and Engels said blacks were savages but a step removed from animals.
We'll ignore that for now and look at communism in action. Vietnam, North Korea, China, USSR all had ruling elites who lived better than the masses, controlled the mechinations of the state, and formed an elite. They in no way were any different than the US in political structure, Stalin, Mao, Kim Il Sung, Ho Chi Minh, all revered and put over the masses as elite and the various politburos over the masses.
So you can appeal to some faith, but 'm talking reality.
You see the same in Rome which wasn't capitalist, you see the same in writing about Mayans and Inca, you saw it in the bible with the jewish tribes, you saw it ancient Egypt, Babylon, Assyria, Persia, Macedonia and etc.
An elite class always rises over the masses