I agree with you that the system revolving around Westbrook was what hurt everyone. The entire season looked designed to force-feed Westbrook an MVP, not to give the Thunder the best chance of winning games and getting past the first round of the playoffs.
The narrative was that Westbrook was surrounded by players who couldn't even hold their own balls on the court, thus he was forced to do everything and it was all their fault if that wasn't enough for the win. That still looks like bullshyt to me.
I definitely don't think the system hurt their offensive games, as even despite Westbrook playing for stats, he utilized all the players on offense as often as he could: post-up opportunities, spot-up opportunities, and PnR/PnP. Defensively, yes, I do think their scheme did hurt everyone. A more accurate assessment would be, the system hurt the narratives surrounding the players more than their games.
Oladipo is a great two-way player and could have been a capable #2 if he had been used right and incorporated into the offense rather than standing around waiting for Westbrook.
Yeah, this isn't true at all. Oladipo is definitely NOT a
great two-way player (by any stretch of the imagination), and Westbrook did his best as did Donovan to get Oladipo involved in the offense - he was just terribly inconsistent (which he's known for) and had a # of injuries. He was absolutely hopeless in that Rockets series.
Robertson/McDermott gives you the versatility to choose defense or offense with the other wing.
Yeah, but not both offense AND defense together, which you should know all about considering the Cavs role players were much of the same.
Just look at the fact that Oladipo/Sabonis was enough to get PG13 and Kanter/McDermott was enough to get Carmelo. Teams knew they had talent.
See now, it doesn't always work out like that. Teams don't get equal value in terms of talent in return. Both Melo and PG wanted off their respective teams, therefore opposition teams obviously weren't put in a position to buy high. Look at all the trades over recent times, and you'll see there aren't too many instances where teams are getting equal value back for the centerpiece of the trade.
If Westbrook had been willing to share some duties with Oladipo more and spend a lot more time force-feeding his big men down low, while playing defense instead of chasing rebounds all game, it would have been a completely different team where the capabilities of those role players could shine. And he still could have managed some great looking numbers - 25-7-11 or something like that probably on better shooting %'s.
As I said above, Westbrook did share duties with Oladipo - he was just inconsistent and dealt with injuries; Westbrook did force-feed his bigs all throughout the season (but not always in accordance to making the
right play, but for stats - which we agree on). Defense, obviously there was a big issue with the way they'd let Westbrook do what he wanted - that we too agree on. He did let his role players shine, but not always in the way that was conducive to winning, which we're both on the same wavelength about.
In principle, we agree with the nature of Wesrbrook's triple-doubles and the [negative] effect they had on the team, but where you an I differ is, Westbrook still had ELITE impact and did "drag" his team to the playoffs even despite him playing for box score numbers.