"ISRAEL'S Nation State Law Is RACIST" - Natalie Portman

[Techniec]

She's stupid. Nothing wrong with declaring it a 'Jewish State'. Nothing 'racist' about it since Jewish isn't a 'race' in the first place.

Must be a slow news day. Don't know what's more inane: this story or the one about Platano Man.

I hope you didnt think that ignoring me in one thread meant you were free to post your garbage elsewhere. I told you, the coli.com is a NO HASBARA ZONE.

Like many previous attempts at spin, hacks such as yourself take advantage of most peoples general ignorance, but that wont work here.

If Israel, operating in a completely different context, declared itself a Jewish state, as a simple affirmation of the character of its population and the beliefs that govern the state, maybe we can accept that

Except, Israel currently occupies the West Bank, Gaza Strip, East Jerusalem and the Golan Heights, and simply refuses to AFFIRM WHAT ITS fukkING BORDERS ARE.

There are millions of Arabs currently under a military occupation

So in this context, declaring yourself a "Jewish" state, while making no mention of the values of equality and democracy, and passing a law that establishes Israel as the historic home of the Jewish people with a "united" Jerusalem as its capital and declares that the Jewish people "have an exclusive right to national self-determination" in Israel, is a normalization, entrenchment and legalization of blatant theft, and continuous human rights violations of the Arab people of Palestine, and a complete denial of their right to self determination

Israel passes controversial 'nation-state' bill into law - CNN

You know this, of course. Youre just playing stupid.

So, if declaring Israel a 'Jewish State' is racist, then why aren't any of the Arab States considered 'racist'?

They would be, if the same context existed. For example, had Sudan (prior to its division) proclaimed such a law, confirming the “Arabness” of the state, and affirming that only “Arabs” had a right to self determination, which would clearly come at the expense of the national and human rights of the non Arab Africans, this would be blatantly racist.

And the Liberal media have convinced otherwise semi-rational people, like yourself, that Israel shouldn't exist and that we shouldn't have anything to do with it based on propaganda and ignorance.

Absolute garbage posting. This has nothing to do with Israel existing. It has to do with the complete denial of the collective political and cultural existence of the Palestinians.

 

[Sccit]

I hope you didnt think that ignoring me in one thread meant you were free to post your garbage elsewhere. I told you, the coli.com is a NO HASBARA ZONE.

Like many previous attempts at spin, hacks such as yourself take advantage of most peoples general ignorance, but that wont work here.

If Israel, operating in a completely different context, declared itself a Jewish state, as a simple affirmation of the character of its population and the beliefs that govern the state, maybe we can accept that

Except, Israel currently occupies the West Bank, Gaza Strip, East Jerusalem and the Golan Heights, and simply refuses to AFFIRM WHAT ITS fukkING BORDERS ARE.

There are millions of Arabs currently under a military occupation

So in this context, declaring yourself a "Jewish" state, while making no mention of the values of equality and democracy, and passing a law that establishes Israel as the historic home of the Jewish people with a "united" Jerusalem as its capital and declares that the Jewish people "have an exclusive right to national self-determination" in Israel, is a normalization, entrenchment and legalization of blatant theft, and continuous human rights violations of the Arab people of Palestine, and a complete denial of their right to self determination

Israel passes controversial 'nation-state' bill into law - CNN

You know this, of course. Youre just playing stupid.



They would be, if the same context existed. For example, had Sudan (prior to its division) proclaimed such a law, confirming the “Arabness” of the state, and affirming that only “Arabs” had a right to self determination, which would clearly come at the expense of the national and human rights of the non Arab Africans, this would be blatantly racist.



Absolute garbage posting. This has nothing to do with Israel existing. It has to do with the complete denial of the collective political and cultural existence of the Palestinians.

FAGHAN, U REALLY NEED TO STOP THIS SHIIT CAPING .... SAYING THAT GRANTING A STATE AN OFFICIAL RELIGION WOULD BE THE SAME AS GRANTING SUDAN AN ARAB ONLY STATE IS DISINGENUOUS. YOU ARE ONE OF THE IDIOTS WHO SPREADS FALSE PROPAGANDA ON ANYTHING JEWISH-ARAB RELATED AKA THE PROBLEM.

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

I hope you didnt think that ignoring me in one thread meant you were free to post your garbage elsewhere.

Welcome to the 'Ignore' list.

Where those who have no actual argument and rely on tired rhetoric go.

​

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

I hope you didnt think that ignoring me in one thread meant you were free to post your garbage elsewhere.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/04/21/AR2006042102002.html?noredirect=on​

"The Protocols," a badly written text of about 100 pages that purports to be a secret plan for world domination hatched at a meeting of powerful Jewish leaders, has been circulating publicly since 1903, when it appeared in serial form in a Russian newspaper. It is the subject of a new exhibition that opened yesterday at the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum. It is also the inspiration for Marc Levin's 2005 documentary, "Protocols of Zion" (showing April 24 at 7 a.m. and May 9 at noon on Cinemax), which takes the book's popularity among bigots and conspiracy theorists as the starting point for a meditation on what it means to be Jewish in a world that still hatches notions such as Jews being responsible for 9/11. The new exhibition also features a computer screen showing Internet sites from around the world -- some celebrating, others debunking "The Protocols." The inescapable conclusion is that the book is alive and well, and its message is finding fertile new ground in susceptible readers.

......

And that, despite the fact that the book was exposed as a fraud in Russia during a prominent court battle in 1993. That wasn't the first time, at least outside Russia. It was also debunked, as an obvious forgery that borrowed heavily from books published in the 1860s, by a British journalist in 1920; again in the London Times in 1921; in Germany in 1924; and by a New York Herald reporter in 1928. And at periodic intervals ever since, including by a U.S. Senate committee in 1964.

Even Joseph Goebbels was convinced ("a forgery," he declared), but that didn't dim his admiration: "I believe in the intrinsic but not in the factual truth of 'The Protocols,' " he said in 1924.

That kind of doublethink has guaranteed the longevity of "The Protocols" despite numerous exposures as a fraud. In Marc Levin's documentary, the filmmaker visits an Arab publisher in New Jersey who ran the book in his newspaper after 9/11. The publisher acknowledges that he doesn't personally believe it. But: "The problem is, I don't write it, I just publish it, to educate the people." He says he included a postscript explaining all this, but then acknowledges that he believes anti-Semitism is pretty much universal because people are jealous. Why are they jealous? "Because the Jews control everything."

Last sentence sounds vaguely familiar.
​

 

[ℒℴѵℯJay ELECTUA]

the Jooz going mad in this thread!!

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

1920-21 | Exposing the ‘Protocols’ as a Fraud​

On Oct. 13, Donald J. Trump, the Republican presidential candidate, said his Democratic opponent, Hillary Clinton, “meets in secret with international banks to plot the destruction of U.S. sovereignty in order to enrich these global financial powers.”

In The New York Times, Jonathan Martin said Mr. Trump veered “dangerously close to the territory of ‘The Protocols of the Elders of Zion.’ ”

The “Protocols” holds a tenacious grip on the popular conspiratorial imagination.

But The Times has never portrayed it as anything other than a fraudulent work of anti-Semitic propaganda. (Though that fact might only further persuade believers of the document’s authenticity. After all, “Protocol No. XII” says a Jewish-controlled press will subjugate Gentiles’ minds “to such an extent that almost all of them see world events through colored glasses which we put over their eyes.”)

.....

Not everyone has accepted the proof, however, even today. So there is still currency to the words of former President William Howard Taft, a Republican, who attacked the “Protocols” in 1920.

“One of the chief causes of suffering and evil in the world today is race hatred, and any man who stimulates that hatred has much to answer for,” Mr. Taft was quoted as saying in The Times. “When he does this by the circulation of unfounded and unjust charges and the arousing of mean and groundless fears, his fault is more to be condemned.”

​

 

[Deep_Black_Conscious]

Her in V For Vendetta was

Check her out as a stripper in the film Closer.

 

[Kilgore Trout]

She a real one

 

[Techniec]

Welcome to the 'Ignore' list.

Where those who have no actual argument and rely on tired rhetoric go.

​

post propaganda, and then when you get called out on it, you deflect and start ranting about the Protocols

you will never be able to post your trash here freely, deal with it

 

[Breh13]

She’ll retract it soon after she gets some texts.