JahFocus CS
Get It How You Get It
Why can't it be both
Because one thing is true and the other isn't.
Stop trying to manufacture reality and history
Why can't it be both
Because one thing is true and the other isn't.
Stop trying to manufacture reality and history
Wait ... how many people (and who) reported this post in order to give it the 'low quality posting' tag?as if those can't be faked. Oh look I found some paper written by a white man proving what they been telling us about our origin since we were born. Negro Please. You nikkas love to believe what crakkkas say. As if they ain't lied about everything regarding our history. Next I'm guessing you gon tell me those DNA results the Washington Post posted a few years back proves that the Ancient Egyptians were Europeans instead of Africans....right?
There is far more evidence of an aboriginal origin to our presence on this continent than the Trans-Atlantic Slave trade. EVERY OTHER CONTINENT ON EARTH had a founding black population. We know from the fossil evidence that the oldest human remains found in South America belong to a woman (Luzia Woman) that even white scientists admit had "negroid" features rather than "indian" features. So we know for a fact that based on the fossils that the first humans on this continent were black. Then you also have all the monuments we left. For example the OLMEC HEADS clearly show that there was a black civilization on this continent before any white man ever got here. And finally, you got Christopher Columbus' own writing (as well as other Europeans "explorers") saying that he encountered "negroes" in the New World. And lets not forget that Columbus wouldn't have even known how to get to the Americas if it was not for his Moorish guide cause the Moors been sailing from Africa to America to centuries.
There is literally mountains of evidence showing that black folks were here in America before EVERYONE. I honestly don't know why this is such a hard thing for people to accept. We already know that black people are native to every other continent on earth. Why not America as well?
Now lets compare that to trying to find evidence of the Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade and you won't find any evidence. There ain't no slave ships anywhere. They ain't no fossil evidence showing all these ships all across the coast lines of where all these millions of Africans were brought in. And even when you just think about it logically, you realize how preposterous the whole story is. You really think they could have taken all those people against their will on those long ass journeys across the ocean? All to plant cotton? shyt simply makes no sense. It makes far more sense than we were already here and the crakkkas stole our land from us. Just like they've done everywhere else on earth.
Wait ... how many people (and who) reported this post in order to give it the 'low quality posting' tag?
they wanna be everything but African
Black people existed first on every continent on this earth
as if those can't be faked. Oh look I found some paper written by a white man proving what they been telling us about our origin since we were born. Negro Please. You nikkas love to believe what crakkkas say. As if they ain't lied about everything regarding our history. Next I'm guessing you gon tell me those DNA results the Washington Post posted a few years back proves that the Ancient Egyptians were Europeans instead of Africans....right?
There is far more evidence of an aboriginal origin to our presence on this continent than the Trans-Atlantic Slave trade. EVERY OTHER CONTINENT ON EARTH had a founding black population. We know from the fossil evidence that the oldest human remains found in South America belong to a woman (Luzia Woman) that even white scientists admit had "negroid" features rather than "indian" features. So we know for a fact that based on the fossils that the first humans on this continent were black. Then you also have all the monuments we left. For example the OLMEC HEADS clearly show that there was a black civilization on this continent before any white man ever got here. And finally, you got Christopher Columbus' own writing (as well as other Europeans "explorers") saying that he encountered "negroes" in the New World. And lets not forget that Columbus wouldn't have even known how to get to the Americas if it was not for his Moorish guide cause the Moors been sailing from Africa to America to centuries.
There is literally mountains of evidence showing that black folks were here in America before EVERYONE. I honestly don't know why this is such a hard thing for people to accept. We already know that black people are native to every other continent on earth. Why not America as well?
Now lets compare that to trying to find evidence of the Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade and you won't find any evidence. There ain't no slave ships anywhere. They ain't no fossil evidence showing all these ships all across the coast lines of where all these millions of Africans were brought in. And even when you just think about it logically, you realize how preposterous the whole story is. You really think they could have taken all those people against their will on those long ass journeys across the ocean? All to plant cotton? shyt simply makes no sense. It makes far more sense than we were already here and the crakkkas stole our land from us. Just like they've done everywhere else on earth.
You're fundamentally correct but THERE WAS A SLAVE TRADE WHICH HAS BEEN GROSSLY OVER EXAGGERATED IN NUMBERS AND SCOPE. Throughout the 150 or so years of legal slavery MAX 500K W Africans were transported to N America. Also many of todays Black Americans actually came from Europe and the British Isles, losers of the Catholic/Protestant wars which were actually continental race wars.
Some excerpts,
The Complexion of the Islanders of the Isle of Arran....The inhabitants of this isle are well proportioned, generally brown, and some of a black complexion......The Complexion of the Islanders of the Isle of Jura
The natives here are very well proportioned, being generally black of complexion and free from bodily imperfections. They speak the Irish language, and wear the plaid, bonnet, etc., as other islanders.
A rare pic of Irish Barbadian fishermen, early 1900s. As you can see half are still blackish.
BASICALLY,THE ORIGINAL EUROPEAN CATHOLICS,INCLUDING THE RULERS WERE ALL BLACK. They lost a race war with white Protestants and suffered deportation-a loooonnnnggggg story for which IDK have all the receipts- YET.
Here's a 5000 word article on this process in England:
The other players at this time were General George Monk and Oliver Cromwell (Williams). Monk without any doubt is a black man, with Cromwell looking very mulatto, not an uncommon produce from the German-Coburg bloodline which of course is of the Moor lines and so named the Black Nobility.
In essence this story is about dark coloured featured families who go to war with the mixed race defeating the existing monarchy, yet still, at the end of this tale, standing above the white British would be a dark complexioned people in the Black Nobility that operated the feudal system against the populations.
In Profile : Oliver Cromwell a black mulatto Puritan
That's why you could find outliers of the original genetics among Royalty as recently as the early 1900s . Princess Viktoria whose mum was Queen Vic's daughter.
There is far more evidence of an aboriginal origin to our presence on this continent than the Trans-Atlantic Slave trade. EVERY OTHER CONTINENT ON EARTH had a founding black population. We know from the fossil evidence that the oldest human remains found in South America belong to a woman (Luzia Woman) that even white scientists admit had "negroid" features rather than "indian" features. So we know for a fact that based on the fossils that the first humans on this continent were black. Then you also have all the monuments we left. For example the OLMEC HEADS clearly show that there was a black civilization on this continent before any white man ever got here. And finally, you got Christopher Columbus' own writing (as well as other Europeans "explorers") saying that he encountered "negroes" in the New World. And lets not forget that Columbus wouldn't have even known how to get to the Americas if it was not for his Moorish guide cause the Moors been sailing from Africa to America to centuries.
There is literally mountains of evidence showing that black folks were here in America before EVERYONE. I honestly don't know why this is such a hard thing for people to accept. We already know that black people are native to every other continent on earth. Why not America as well?
Have you even seen or visited the Olmec Colossal Heads in person? I have, and they look just as Indian (Native Mayan/Incan Americans) as they do Negroid.
I agree with some of the things that you posted, but most of it is bullshyt. Yeah...I’m sure that some of us (Blacks) were here before Caucasoid Europeans. Denying that the slave trade existed on a massive scale for centuries shows how ignorant (or in denial) you are about the entire subject.
*Edit*
Then you criticize others for “believing what white people” tell them, yet you talk about white scientists as if what they say has any validation about Blacks in South America. Talking about “even white scientists admit it”. That’s hypocritical.
Lowkey c00n post.Anyone who believes that Muur/Aboriginal/Hebrew Israelite garbage is a total fukking idiot who is a sad waste of oxygen. Unfortunately social media is causing this pseudohistorical bullshyt to spread amongst the ignorant and gullible. Goddamn shame.
That's why you could find outliers of the original genetics among Royalty as recently as the early 1900s . Princess Viktoria whose mum was Queen Vic's daughter.