Jamies Wiston rape case takes another turn: Federal Authorities are Investigating FSU(UPDATE)
- Thread starter gho3st
- Start date
They won't intervene in the Zimmerman case but they'll get involved in this shyt?
This fair and balanced justice system will free those consider not guilty and jail those considered guilty :bayer:
I hate this country, a white man rapes his own fukking daughter and gets off even though there's proof. There's no proof Winston raped this whore, yet the feds are now involved? I wonder why!
This is a none story.Ol' girl attention whore lawyer Aunt filed a Federal Civil Right law suit against FSU not Jameis Winston on March 16. This is the only reason why they are Investigating FSU.
Last edited:
Lucky_Lefty
Dreams Are Colder Than Death...
Ol' girl attention whore lawyer Aunt filed a Federal Civil Right law suit against FSU not Jameis Winston on March 16. This is the only reason why they are Invesigating FSU.
fsu aint worried, it didnt take place on campus
godkiller
"We are the Fury"
Grams
Grams Grands Gucci G'd Up
They still sending for this boy
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/...ns-against-fsu-jamies-winston.html?hp&hp&_r=0
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/...ns-against-fsu-jamies-winston.html?hp&hp&_r=0
That NYT piece doesn't comdemn Jameis at all. They go HARD at the police who investigated the crime tho.
In his announcement, the prosecutor, William N. Meggs, acknowledged a number of shortcomings in the police investigation. In fact, an examination by The New York Times has found that there was virtually no investigation at all, either by the police or the university.
The police did not follow the obvious leads that would have quickly identified the suspect as well as witnesses, one of whom videotaped part of the sexual encounter. After the accuser identified Mr. Winston as her assailant, the police did not even attempt to interview him for nearly two weeks and never obtained his DNA.
The detective handling the case waited two months to write his first report and then prematurely suspended his inquiry without informing the accuser. By the time the prosecutor got the case, important evidence had disappeared, including the video of the sexual act.
“They just missed all the basic fundamental stuff that you are supposed to do,” Mr. Meggs said in a recent interview. Even so, he cautioned, a better investigation might have yielded the same result.
In his announcement, the prosecutor, William N. Meggs, acknowledged a number of shortcomings in the police investigation. In fact, an examination by The New York Times has found that there was virtually no investigation at all, either by the police or the university.
The police did not follow the obvious leads that would have quickly identified the suspect as well as witnesses, one of whom videotaped part of the sexual encounter. After the accuser identified Mr. Winston as her assailant, the police did not even attempt to interview him for nearly two weeks and never obtained his DNA.
The detective handling the case waited two months to write his first report and then prematurely suspended his inquiry without informing the accuser. By the time the prosecutor got the case, important evidence had disappeared, including the video of the sexual act.
“They just missed all the basic fundamental stuff that you are supposed to do,” Mr. Meggs said in a recent interview. Even so, he cautioned, a better investigation might have yielded the same result.
Oh. Well this doesn't seem right.
Officer Pate’s blunt interviewing style did not help, the student said. “The first thing he asked me,” she recounted, “was if I was sure this was rape or if I just didn’t want a baby or wanted the morning after pill.” He also made comments, she said, “like, ‘Are you sure you want to file a report? It will be very awkward, especially for a female.’”
In his complaint to the police, the father wrote that Officer Pate had suggested that an investigation “would be futile, as ‘this kind of stuff happens all the time here.’” The family also said the police had focused more on the accuser than on the accused.
Officer Pate’s blunt interviewing style did not help, the student said. “The first thing he asked me,” she recounted, “was if I was sure this was rape or if I just didn’t want a baby or wanted the morning after pill.” He also made comments, she said, “like, ‘Are you sure you want to file a report? It will be very awkward, especially for a female.’”
In his complaint to the police, the father wrote that Officer Pate had suggested that an investigation “would be futile, as ‘this kind of stuff happens all the time here.’” The family also said the police had focused more on the accuser than on the accused.