I love hating on the Knicks as much as the next man but KP is the only reason the Knicks look like they'd even touch 30 wins this year. He's arguably a better defender than KAT too.Who else could? Porzingis?
If so y'all have seen a few putback dunks and crowned this man the savior
Just on the general improvement of a team alone... I really wouldn't call the RoTY contest over by a long shot.
PER over small sample sizes can make tons of players look "historic". Just a month ago people were saying that Jeremy Lamb > Harden because of PER. You want to dig up old stats you can find late season stretches from Andrea Bargnani that make him look like a real #1 overall pick.Bro....the historic part is straight from the headline of the article I posted......that ain't me, but that being said, at the moment his PER is one of the greatest PER for a rookie in history, that's where the historic part comes in.
The made up espn stat just accompanied the article, I put no stock in that.
PER and crammed numbers don't work.
But he's a really good player. Just not in a rush to crown people in December. Look at what happened to all the Brandon Jennings stans.






not on a 1 win team when there are other rookies being major factors.