"My 37 isn't MJ's 37." Kobe Bean Bryant Yall
- Thread starter princeofhaiti
- Start date
-
- Tags
- bulls father time kobe lakers mj
Wtf does that even mean
He's saying Age is more detrimental than minutes logged and he's absolutely rightWtf does that even mean
Nah,
Minutes played is just like rb carries or pitchers innings pitched, or years in soccer.
Minutes played is just like rb carries or pitchers innings pitched, or years in soccer.
No he's saying that wear and tear from playing isn't real
. Like somebody just made the shyt up.
I don't know anything about baseball.
You can't compare RB carries to anything else in sports
No, he's not though
That what it sounded like to me
Long Live The Kane
Tyrant Titan
There's the minutes. ..and then there's the fact that he also suffered a catastrophic injury (the Achilles) as well as other less severe though far from negligible chronic knee injuries ...physically there's no comparison, not even factoring in he wasn't quite the athlete mj was in his prime
Eric dikkerson is the only rb who was still effective after 390 carries
Look at demarco Murray
Look at demarco Murray
I don't know anything about baseball.
You can't compare RB carries to anything else in sports
That what it sounded like to me
Murray problem is that offense.
Mantis Toboggan M.D.
Drink wolf cola
Do people really think that 55,000 fukking minutes isn't taking a toll on Bryant as a basketball player? My brain is struggling to process this. He's right. His 37 years old in the NBA isn't the same as when Jordan was 37. Mike didn't play 1993-94, and he missed over 60 games in the following season before coming back. He sat all of 1998-99 through 2000-2001. He had a lot less wear and tear on the court. I don't even want to know how many playoff minutes Bryant has on his legs.