Samsung Officially Cancels the Galaxy Note 7

TheGregReaper

#HeatNation #SouthernCalUSC #LiverpoolFC
Supporter
Joined
May 12, 2012
Messages
10,345
Reputation
2,090
Daps
27,871
Reppin
WATTS & Inglewood Southern Kalifornia
Samsung knew a third replacement Note 7 caught fire on Tuesday and said nothing

Another replacement Samsung Galaxy Note 7 has caught fire, bringing the total to three this week alone. This one was owned by Michael Klering of Nicholasville, Kentucky. He told WKYT that he woke up at 4AM to find his bedroom filled with smoke and his phone on fire. Later in the day, he went to the hospital with acute bronchitis caused by smoke inhalation.

"The phone is supposed to be the replacement, so you would have thought it would be safe," Klering told WKYT, saying that he had owned the replacement phone for a little more than a week. "It wasn’t plugged in. It wasn’t anything, it was just sitting there."

The most disturbing part of this is that Klering’s phone caught fire on Tuesday and Samsung knew about it and didn’t say anything. And actually, it gets worse than that.

Samsung asked Klering if they could take possession of the phone and he said no, though the company did pay to have it x-rayed — but the damning evidence comes in the form of a text message that Klering inadvertently received from a Samsung representative:

Just now got this. I can try and slow him down if we think it will matter, or we just let him do what he keeps threatening to do and see if he does it

Samsung was aware that its replacement phones were catching fire five days ago. Another caught fire on Thursday (on an airplane), and then another on Friday in the hands of a thirteen-year old girl. That’s three in less than a week, with Samsung giving its customers little more than meaningless platitudes about "[taking] every report seriously" and that "customer safety remains our highest priority as we are investigating the matter."

Except that’s a lie. If customer safety was really the highest priority, we would have seen statements from Samsung telling customers to stop using even their replacement phones after the fire on the Southwest flight on Thursday.

At this point, it’s irresponsible for us to say anything else: If you own a Samsung Galaxy Note 7 you should immediately stop using it and return it for a refund — all the major US carriers will exchange the phone, regardless of purchase date. We don’t know why Samsung hasn’t been more forthcoming about what’s going on with these replacement devices, but it doesn’t really matter. Until we get more information, the simplest explanation is the best one: The Samsung Galaxy Note 7 is a fundamentally defective product and it should be pulled from the market without delay.
 

NoMorePie

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Nov 26, 2014
Messages
55,992
Reputation
9,907
Daps
203,122
Reppin
Mississauga
Samsung has yet to email me an unlock code for the new Note 7. Since I've done switched carriers i'm forced to switch back to my old one.. ah well.

3 new Note 7s blowing up in 1 week... The fukk is going on here
 

winb83

52 Years Young
Supporter
Joined
May 28, 2012
Messages
44,259
Reputation
3,747
Daps
67,255
Reppin
Michigan
The dream is dead.
Samsung knew a third replacement Note 7 caught fire on Tuesday and said nothing
Three of these replacements have caught fire in less than a week and Samsung tried to play dumb about it.

As soon as Best Buy gives the word I'm probably boxing this shyt back up and returning it for a full refund. At least I'll get 2 free 256GB cards for my troubles. Probably go back to the S7.
 

ORDER_66

The Fire Rises 2023
Joined
Feb 2, 2014
Messages
141,886
Reputation
15,670
Daps
573,335
Reppin
Queens,NY
Jesus fukking Christ Just RECALL the entire NOTE line... :damn: clearly the new batteries are fukking flawed and defective!!! :damn: Give them a Edge or some other shyt UNTIL you fix the fukker.
 

winb83

52 Years Young
Supporter
Joined
May 28, 2012
Messages
44,259
Reputation
3,747
Daps
67,255
Reppin
Michigan
Well would you be happy with an older phone as a replacement??? I mean Id happily take a new note 6 if I had a choice. :why:
Just go with the S7. It doesn't have these problems. It's obvious Samsung doesn't even know what's causing this on the Note7 because if they did why would it start up again with replacement units? I'm guessing they just cancel the Note7 and not offer replacements unless it's a different phone model.
 

TooLazyToMakeUp1

LWO suicide bomber
Supporter
Joined
Nov 19, 2012
Messages
24,835
Reputation
8,725
Daps
96,152
Reppin
Out here in my damn drawls
Still want one
full
 

Truefan31

Superstar
Joined
Jan 9, 2016
Messages
4,412
Reputation
661
Daps
13,155
Samsung knew a third replacement Note 7 caught fire on Tuesday and said nothing

Another replacement Samsung Galaxy Note 7 has caught fire, bringing the total to three this week alone. This one was owned by Michael Klering of Nicholasville, Kentucky. He told WKYT that he woke up at 4AM to find his bedroom filled with smoke and his phone on fire. Later in the day, he went to the hospital with acute bronchitis caused by smoke inhalation.

"The phone is supposed to be the replacement, so you would have thought it would be safe," Klering told WKYT, saying that he had owned the replacement phone for a little more than a week. "It wasn’t plugged in. It wasn’t anything, it was just sitting there."

The most disturbing part of this is that Klering’s phone caught fire on Tuesday and Samsung knew about it and didn’t say anything. And actually, it gets worse than that.

Samsung asked Klering if they could take possession of the phone and he said no, though the company did pay to have it x-rayed — but the damning evidence comes in the form of a text message that Klering inadvertently received from a Samsung representative:

Just now got this. I can try and slow him down if we think it will matter, or we just let him do what he keeps threatening to do and see if he does it

Samsung was aware that its replacement phones were catching fire five days ago. Another caught fire on Thursday (on an airplane), and then another on Friday in the hands of a thirteen-year old girl. That’s three in less than a week, with Samsung giving its customers little more than meaningless platitudes about "[taking] every report seriously" and that "customer safety remains our highest priority as we are investigating the matter."

Except that’s a lie. If customer safety was really the highest priority, we would have seen statements from Samsung telling customers to stop using even their replacement phones after the fire on the Southwest flight on Thursday.

At this point, it’s irresponsible for us to say anything else: If you own a Samsung Galaxy Note 7 you should immediately stop using it and return it for a refund — all the major US carriers will exchange the phone, regardless of purchase date. We don’t know why Samsung hasn’t been more forthcoming about what’s going on with these replacement devices, but it doesn’t really matter. Until we get more information, the simplest explanation is the best one: The Samsung Galaxy Note 7 is a fundamentally defective product and it should be pulled from the market without delay.

900 phone you can't use on a plane and can't even get the replacements from exploding brehs:mjlol:

Tim Cook laughin his ass off and he didn't have to do anything.
 

ORDER_66

The Fire Rises 2023
Joined
Feb 2, 2014
Messages
141,886
Reputation
15,670
Daps
573,335
Reppin
Queens,NY
Just go with the S7. It doesn't have these problems. It's obvious Samsung doesn't even know what's causing this on the Note7 because if they did why would it start up again with replacement units? I'm guessing they just cancel the Note7 and not offer replacements unless it's a different phone model.

I dont have the samsung but If I did I'd take the S7 as a replacement...:ehh:
 

O.G.B

Real O.G.
Joined
Dec 1, 2012
Messages
10,464
Reputation
-616
Daps
30,691
Lol which doesn't change the fact that Apple is cakin more than Samsung this year even in a so called down year for Apple.

This is a no-brainer! Apple has always "caked" more than Samsung profit wise due to the fact that Samsung sells over 50 smartphones, most which are lower cost basic & mid tier models. Nevertheless this still doesn't alter the fact that iPhone sales are in the dumps now.

:pachaha:

Samsung can thank themselves for allowing the iPhone 7 to sell more now cuz they fukked up.

Samsung "fukked up" by stepping up to the plate & issuing a recall instead of following the Apple playbook which is to yearly ignore their defective, glitchy iPhone's & blame the consumer for it's faulty products causes by manufacturing procedures.

#Antennagate: "You're holding it wrong"
#Bendgate
#Touch Disease
#Crackgate
#Yellowgate
#Hissgate

:lolbron:


 

Truefan31

Superstar
Joined
Jan 9, 2016
Messages
4,412
Reputation
661
Daps
13,155
This is a no-brainer! Apple has always "caked" more than Samsung profit wise due to the fact that Samsung sells over 50 smartphones, most which are lower cost basic & mid tier models. Nevertheless this still doesn't alter the fact that iPhone sales are in the dumps now.

:pachaha:



Samsung "fukked up" by stepping up to the plate & issuing a recall instead of following the Apple playbook which is to yearly ignore their defective, glitchy iPhone's & blame the consumer for it's faulty products causes by manufacturing procedures.

#Antennagate: "You're holding it wrong"
#Bendgate
#Touch Disease
#Crackgate
#Yellowgate
#Hissgate

:lolbron:

Stepping up to the plate lol. They bout to recall the note 7 for good at the 4 major carriers. Govt had to get involved because the number of note 7s blowing up were increasing. Samsung only did a voluntary recall. If they cared about you which they don't it'd be a mandatory at the least.

And again you can gas up Samsung all you want for their quarterly earnings, yet it's still far behind Apple even in their supposed down year:mjlol:

Oh and you can use your iPhone on a plane unlike a note 7 :mjlol:

You def a Stan claiming what's goin on with the note 7 is somehow a W for Samsung lol
 
Last edited:

O.G.B

Real O.G.
Joined
Dec 1, 2012
Messages
10,464
Reputation
-616
Daps
30,691
Stepping up to the plate lol. They bout to recall the note 7 for good at the 4 major carriers.. Samsung only did a voluntary recall. If they cared about you which they don't it'd be a mandatory at the least.

Wrong! The U.S government agencies only got involved with Samsung's recall because they have pro Apple loyalists on board & this was a perfect opportunity for them from a consumer & media perspective to make it seem like they were actually doing their jobs for once.

Also it's quite PECULIAR that none of the other major carriers internationally/worldwide outside of the U.S have threatened to discontinue the Note 7 or that all of the recent "explosions" of Note 7's thus far are only in the U.S.

:sas2:



And at at least a voluntary recall from Samsung is better than NO RECALL from Apple for:

#Antennagate: "You're holding it wrong"
#Bendgate
#Touch Disease
#Crackgate
#Yellowgate
#Hissgate


Which effected or still effects millions of iPhone users.

Class action lawsuit against Apple over iPhone 6 ‘Touch Disease’ hardware flaw gains momentum

A few months back, we reported on a hardware flaw plaguing a growing number of iPhone 6 and iPhone 6 Plus users, which garnered the name of “Touch Disease.” Shortly after the flaw was initially reported on, a trio of iPhone users filed a class action lawsuit against Apple, claiming that Apple refuses to repair devices affected by Touch Disease for free. Over a month later, Apple has yet to publicly acknowledge the issue.

Now, Motherboard reports that the push to get Apple to respond to the issue is growing thanks to more backing behind the original class action lawsuit in California and a separate, new lawsuit in Utah…

Touch Disease is a hardware flaw that causes the displays on iPhone 6 and iPhone 6 Plus units to become unresponsive and show a thin gray, flickering line along the top. Though the iPhone 6 is not immune, the issue seems to primary plague the larger-screened Plus model. The flaw affects the logic board’s “touch IC” controller chips, thus meaning that replacing the iPhone’s display is not an adequate fix. Because Apple will not perform logic board repairs on iPhones, the company’s solution to the problem thus far has been to purchase a new phone.

Apple pushes users to pay $329 to replace their Touch Disease-ridden iPhone 6 Plus with a refurbished model, which according to today’s Motherboard report, is often hit with the same bug “within days or weeks of being replaced.”

While Apple has yet to publicly acknowledge Touch Disease, today’s report claims that “five separate current and former Apple Geniuses have confirmed” that Apple is aware of the problem, but won’t tell customers about it.

Apple has, however, at least acknowledged the issue in federal court. The company has requested an “extension of time to respond to the Complaint” in the more recent Utah class action, while in California Apple requested that the Utah and California cases be combined into one:

“Given the similarity between the [Utah] and [California] actions, it would unnecessarily tax judicial resources if these actions were to proceed in separate class action lawsuits—especially where the [Utah] and [California] Plaintiffs purport to represent the same putative class of all consumers who purchased an iPhone 6 or 6 Plus,” Apple’s lawyers wrote in the filing.

The California case is much larger than the Utah one, as well. One attorney in the case has been contacted by 10,000 people asking to join the suit. That same attorney, Richard McCune, filed an updated lawsuit against Apple last night, adding several plaintiffs and three separate law firms to the battle.

In an email to Motherboard, McCune wrote:

“Each of the firms (who had their own clients) brings strength to the case, including Stephen Larson of Larson O’Brien, who is a former Federal Judge. With these firms working with us, we believe it gives us the best chance of obtaining a positive result in the case for the owners of the phones.”

With the growing push behind these cases, it’s unlikely that Apple will continue to ignore the problem, so it shouldn’t be long until the company issues some sort of response…


Class action lawsuit against Apple over iPhone 6 ‘Touch Disease’ hardware flaw gains momentum

:mjlol:


,And again you can gas up Samsung all you want for their quarterly earnings, yet it's still far behind Apple even in their supposed down year:mjlol:

Which is based only on Apple's Enterprise Business, not their floundering iPhones sales or iPhone profits! :pachaha:
 

Truefan31

Superstar
Joined
Jan 9, 2016
Messages
4,412
Reputation
661
Daps
13,155
Wrong! The U.S government agencies only got involved with Samsung's recall because they have pro Apple loyalists on board & this was a perfect opportunity for them from a consumer & media perspective to make it seem like they were actually doing their jobs for once.

Also it's quite PECULIAR that none of the other major carriers internationally/worldwide outside of the U.S have threatened to discontinue the Note 7 or that all of the recent "explosions" of Note 7's thus far are only in the U.S.

:sas2:



And at at least a voluntary recall from Samsung is better than NO RECALL from Apple for:

#Antennagate: "You're holding it wrong"
#Bendgate
#Touch Disease
#Crackgate
#Yellowgate
#Hissgate


Which effected or still effects millions of iPhone users.

Class action lawsuit against Apple over iPhone 6 ‘Touch Disease’ hardware flaw gains momentum

A few months back, we reported on a hardware flaw plaguing a growing number of iPhone 6 and iPhone 6 Plus users, which garnered the name of “Touch Disease.” Shortly after the flaw was initially reported on, a trio of iPhone users filed a class action lawsuit against Apple, claiming that Apple refuses to repair devices affected by Touch Disease for free. Over a month later, Apple has yet to publicly acknowledge the issue.

Now, Motherboard reports that the push to get Apple to respond to the issue is growing thanks to more backing behind the original class action lawsuit in California and a separate, new lawsuit in Utah…

Touch Disease is a hardware flaw that causes the displays on iPhone 6 and iPhone 6 Plus units to become unresponsive and show a thin gray, flickering line along the top. Though the iPhone 6 is not immune, the issue seems to primary plague the larger-screened Plus model. The flaw affects the logic board’s “touch IC” controller chips, thus meaning that replacing the iPhone’s display is not an adequate fix. Because Apple will not perform logic board repairs on iPhones, the company’s solution to the problem thus far has been to purchase a new phone.

Apple pushes users to pay $329 to replace their Touch Disease-ridden iPhone 6 Plus with a refurbished model, which according to today’s Motherboard report, is often hit with the same bug “within days or weeks of being replaced.”

While Apple has yet to publicly acknowledge Touch Disease, today’s report claims that “five separate current and former Apple Geniuses have confirmed” that Apple is aware of the problem, but won’t tell customers about it.

Apple has, however, at least acknowledged the issue in federal court. The company has requested an “extension of time to respond to the Complaint” in the more recent Utah class action, while in California Apple requested that the Utah and California cases be combined into one:

“Given the similarity between the [Utah] and [California] actions, it would unnecessarily tax judicial resources if these actions were to proceed in separate class action lawsuits—especially where the [Utah] and [California] Plaintiffs purport to represent the same putative class of all consumers who purchased an iPhone 6 or 6 Plus,” Apple’s lawyers wrote in the filing.

The California case is much larger than the Utah one, as well. One attorney in the case has been contacted by 10,000 people asking to join the suit. That same attorney, Richard McCune, filed an updated lawsuit against Apple last night, adding several plaintiffs and three separate law firms to the battle.

In an email to Motherboard, McCune wrote:

“Each of the firms (who had their own clients) brings strength to the case, including Stephen Larson of Larson O’Brien, who is a former Federal Judge. With these firms working with us, we believe it gives us the best chance of obtaining a positive result in the case for the owners of the phones.”

With the growing push behind these cases, it’s unlikely that Apple will continue to ignore the problem, so it shouldn’t be long until the company issues some sort of response…


Class action lawsuit against Apple over iPhone 6 ‘Touch Disease’ hardware flaw gains momentum

:mjlol:




Which is based only on Apple's Enterprise Business, not their floundering iPhones sales or iPhone profits! :pachaha:

Lol yeah ur a Stan. They got involved because the number of exploding note 7s was growing and Samsung only did a bs voluntary recall. Which lookin at it now is laughable since the replacements are fukkin up too.

One million note 7s and they can't even get that right lol.

You must not be aware then that countries outside the us you can't even get a note 7. They've pulled them off shelves.

Lol floundering profits, Apple controls over 90% of total mobile profit leaving scraps to the rest. Again Apple in this supposed bad year will make way more than the gassed up Samsung number you're preaching.

Samsung played themselves Apple didn't have to do a thing lol
 
Top