NY Times writer reminds NFL teams that FA to be Michael Vick killed dogs in latest article

[Roadie pipeher]

wheres is the outrage for the animals peta continually kills to this day?

 

[AVXL]

So that's the reason you are here

What does that mean?

@NYC Rebel is an extremely bright guy, I'm not shytting on him, but him always ringing the fake outrage alarm over these types of article is tiresome. But because it involves Vick & "cacs" the average Coli poster comes in here on their high horse.

 

[Amare's Right Hook]

FUKK WHITE PEOPLE.

Seriously.

Fukk yall.

You have all this outrage over some dead dogs but, you didn't care that Zimmerman killed a high school kid. Your priorities all fukked up.

dogs don't wear hoodies, stop acting so suspicious

 

[USSInsiders]

this shyt doesn't even seem real. Totally brought that shyt up for absolutely no reason at all

 

[jwinfield]

FUKK WHITE PEOPLE.

Seriously.

Fukk yall.

You have all this outrage over some dead dogs but, you didn't care that Zimmerman killed a high school kid. Your priorities all fukked up.

There was a bunch of outrage in main stream media before he was arrested and after he was found not guilty.

 

[USSInsiders]

The bytch tried to low key exhonerate Cooper.

Ehhhhh, not really, if anything she was bringing him up to show that she wasn't being biased in her targeting of Vick. Him being white was her way of saying, " see, I'm not racist." He's a piece of shyt, too.

 

[#1 pick]

What does that mean?

@NYC Rebel is an extremely bright guy, I'm not shytting on him, but him always ringing the fake outrage alarm over these types of article is tiresome. But because it involves Vick & "cacs" the average Coli poster comes in here on their high horse.

This is real outrage breh. If you haven't been raised around whites, you wouldn't know that this is sideways racism. This is what the more educated whites do. Getting the same message across with a large more impactful message. It's basically saying, f**k his family and his time, I don't want him to eat ever again but in a more respectful way. You from the hood breh, you not used to people being that bytchmade. You more used to direct bytchassness. These Whites aren't like that. There's level to this shyt.

 

[NYC Rebel]

The OP is the king of fake outrage & always responding to media created narratives with his own unique yet cliched opposing viewpoint.

This is why you need to shut the fukk up.

#1.....if you knew anything about thie history of black journalism LIKE the Pittsburgh Courier, there's a LONG and STORIED history of those newspapers providing a counter point to articles like the ones listed here in the NY Times. It was those papers that helped Jackie Robinson and others when ridiculously scrutinized. Telling me i'm "outraged" or shouldn't "click" it is ridiculous and also very weak and timid.

#2......I'm a subscriber to the NY Times, which is still the world's greatest newspaper. I'm somewhat shocked at what is clearly vindictive journalism that was published considering:

• Nothing new was learned here
• all 32 teams know what Vick did
• the writers hypocrisy in seeking redemptive qualities in a Lance Armstrong but not wanting any for Vick.

I'm sorry...but call my response "cliched" or what have you...but even you agreed that this was a shyt article. Calling my response cliche is expected by you weak new age negros who think letting shyt pass is a sign of "strength." Your indifference makes you just as culpable.


fukk your lame ass.

 

[yoyoyo1]

I don't like this thread, it gives credibility to the article. Ignore it next time cause it's obviously stupid and reaching.


This being said. You Coli people have almost 80 posts in this thread? IF YOU MUST... instead of wasting time on these posts, wasting them productively? What are you gonna do for real though to make sure this doesn't happen again?


Author Email: juliet@nytimes.com
Department Email: sports@nytimes.com
Public Editor Margaret Sullivan: public@nytimes.com

 

[USSInsiders]

So are pounds that euthanize dogs committing atrocities?? People like this are the types I assume are against abortion but support every policy that child prevents that him/her from succeeding, parents give the kid a shot at life, etc......fukk dogs, start caring about people

Goddamn, listen. There's a huge difference between trying to kill something as peaceably as possible and doing it because it's dying, sick, injured, or damaged goods, and maliciously killing something without any regard for the thing you're killing and only doing so because you put it in a fukked up position.


These dudes killing these pitbulls don't give a fukk about how they do it. There's a big difference between poking a dog with a syringe and putting it to sleep and sticking a fukking electric cord in its mouth and plugging it into the wall, bashing them to death with your bare hands, or just letting it bleed out to death, or shooting it in the head with a handgun.


The cac*nt who wrote this article had no reason for bringing that shyt VIck did for no reason other than fluff, but it doesn't lessen the fukked up shyt that Vick did or was involved in. That being said, he did his time, he's doing all the nice-guy, bullshyt PR shyt to get the media and people off his back, let the man live his life in peace.

 

[NYC Rebel]

I don't like this thread, it gives credibility to the article. Ignore it next time cause it's obviously stupid and reaching

I'm sorry...but you lame niqqas think letting shyt slide is a sign of strength.

Saying nothing opens the door to continuing shyt. If you know the history of your people, you'd know not letting shyt slide put an end to bigotted articles like this having so much say. But these clowns today know that yall new age negros know you won't say anything. fukk that. It's too late in the day to let the bullshyt slide. fukk yall living on your knees niqqas.

 

[yoyoyo1]

I'm sorry...but you lame niqqas think letting shyt slide is a sign of strength.

Saying nothing opens the door to continuing shyt. If you know the history of your people, you'd know not letting shyt slide put an end to bigotted articles like this having so much say. But these clowns today know that yall new age negros know you won't say anything. fukk that. It's too late in the day to let the bullshyt slide. fukk yall living on your knees niqqas.

I don't like this thread, it gives credibility to the article. Ignore it next time cause it's obviously stupid and reaching.


This being said. You Coli people have almost 80 posts in this thread? IF YOU MUST... instead of wasting time on these posts, wasting them productively? What are you gonna do for real though to make sure this doesn't happen again?


Author Email: juliet@nytimes.com
Department Email: sports@nytimes.com
Public Editor Margaret Sullivan: public@nytimes.com

I agree with you, but I was too quick to post.. I meant on forums talking amongst likeminded people.

 

[Millions]

we fight dogs yall fight chickens wats the fukkin difference?

 

[NYC Rebel]

I don't like this thread, it gives credibility to the article. Ignore it next time cause it's obviously stupid and reaching.


This being said. You Coli people have almost 80 posts in this thread? IF YOU MUST... instead of wasting time on these posts, wasting them productively? What are you gonna do for real though to make sure this doesn't happen again?


Author Email: juliet@nytimes.com
Department Email: sports@nytimes.com
Public Editor Margaret Sullivan: public@nytimes.com

Not sure if you remember Deadspin publishing my article years back when I caught ProFootballTalk lying about McNabb being salty about Vick being signed. I did the same in making Nowarocki change his article about Cam Newton.

It's too late in the day to allow the bullshyt they only reserve for niqqas to go untouched.

 

[AVXL]

This is why you need to shut the fukk up.

#1.....if you knew anything about thie history of black journalism LIKE the Pittsburgh Courier, there's a LONG and STORIED history of those newspapers providing a counter point to articles like the ones listed here in the NY Times. It was those papers that helped Jackie Robinson and others when ridiculously scrutinized. Telling me i'm "outraged" or shouldn't "click" it is ridiculous and also very weak and timid.

#2......I'm a subscriber to the NY Times, which is still the world's greatest newspaper. I'm somewhat shocked at what is clearly vindictive journalism that was published considering:

• Nothing new was learned here
• all 32 teams know what Vick did
• the writers hypocrisy in seeking redemptive qualities in a Lance Armstrong but not wanting any for Vick.

I'm sorry...but call my response "cliched" or what have you...but even you agreed that this was a shyt article. Calling my response cliche is expected by you weak new age negros who think letting shyt pass is a sign of "strength." Your indifference makes you just as culpable.


fukk your lame ass.

@ indifference. Has your dumb ass forgotten what city I'm in, what team I support, what the impact of Vick and his legacy still means in my city? Are you that naive to think that because I'm not gonna respond to the millionth article about Vick being involved in dogfighting that I'm somehow indifferent on this topic? Have you lost your fukking mind?

And how would you describe your response? Measured? Insightful? At least @#1 pick responded to the article & the writer directly. But you're so fukkin think skinned and irrational that anyone who doesn't agree with you is instantly type cast as "a new negro" because they don't share your faux militant views. Bottom line is you're the armchair QB of being down with the cause, you sit on the sidelines and ain't never rode for shyt. You get outraged on your iPad sipping on your Starbucks comfortably removed from the real struggle, but b/c you posted an irrelevant NY Times article on Mike Vick which you have deemed must see reading by the NFL executive class, you're about that life.

Get the fukk all the way up outta here with this nonsense and fukk you too.