Runaway slave ads for light skinned or white passing black people deconstruct cac hypocrisy

ReturnOfJudah

Veteran
Joined
Nov 25, 2014
Messages
32,309
Reputation
-735
Daps
100,753


What a video. :wow:

In this video she describes multiple ads or circumstances from the 1700's to current day.

In 1700's a black man named Gideon was a free man with a white wife. He had black blood but was declared a non-black due to him arguing (successfully) that he had less black features than the men arguing he was black. He was declared a free man and was the talk of the town. She also reads ads of runaway slaves of mulattos who are said to "pass as white" according to the ad, but as still described to be negro. These days these people would less likely be called black the way they way were considered back then. Rashida Jones, who is mixed with black and white, isn't considered by most people to be black in modern day because she doesn't look it but in those days she would be considered a slave and a negro.

:francis:

In this video she just pulls apart cac narrative after cac narrative and how utterly evil all of this is.

Rashida would be treated better than the rest of the slaves and would be a house nikka since she come from her slave master's stock. She would also receive education, and inheritance. A lot of Boule and upper class blacks came from that stock and still til this day are the gate keepers for cacs. They claim they speak of behalf of black folks, but they don't fukk with us because they know who their real father is.
 

3rdWorld

Veteran
Joined
Mar 24, 2014
Messages
40,070
Reputation
2,959
Daps
117,602
Nah breh, just because somebody passes for white doesn’t make them white. You don’t think they had family that didn’t look like them that they worried about? You’d have to be a sociopath to see what’s going on and ignore it because you happen to be able to dodge it based on your complexion.

Those are separate issues.
Why does this only apply to Blacks and no one else??
Im just going by the idea promoted on here that you are what you look like..if a White person looks Black, theyre Black. But if a Black person looks White with blonde hair and blue eyes theyre somehow not White. This is how Europeans managed to keep themselves pure and Blacks mixed to hell.
 

The Burger King

Fast Food Gangsta
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Dec 20, 2013
Messages
8,573
Reputation
13,486
Daps
81,295
Reppin
East Whopper City
Those are separate issues.
Why does this only apply to Blacks and no one else??
Im just going by the idea promoted on here that you are what you look like..if a White person looks Black, theyre Black. But if a Black person looks White with blonde hair and blue eyes theyre somehow not White. This is how Europeans managed to keep themselves pure and Blacks mixed to hell.
Exactly, the logic makes no sense and is one of the dumbest narratives I see on here and amongst black people as a whole.

“White passing” is white.

There’s a difference between being “mixed” or having admixture vs. looking straight up CAC.
 

Tair

Superstar
Joined
Nov 29, 2019
Messages
5,296
Reputation
2,092
Daps
26,570
Those are separate issues.
Why does this only apply to Blacks and no one else??
Im just going by the idea promoted on here that you are what you look like..if a White person looks Black, theyre Black. But if a Black person looks White with blonde hair and blue eyes theyre somehow not White. This is how Europeans managed to keep themselves pure and Blacks mixed to hell.

Some of you have no idea what Black is.

And, a lot of coli folk come from color-caste societies with 100 different "races" like Brazil. So when they come to America they bring their confusion with them.

Rashida would be treated better than the rest of the slaves and would be a house nikka since she come from her slave master's stock. She would also receive education, and inheritance. A lot of Boule and upper class blacks came from that stock and still til this day are the gate keepers for cacs. They claim they speak of behalf of black folks, but they don't fukk with us because they know who their real father is.

House slaves were subjected to rape, violence, and torture from white man, woman, and child.

:snoop:
 

get these nets

Veteran
Joined
Jul 8, 2017
Messages
51,697
Reputation
13,943
Daps
195,741
Reppin
Above the fray.
Don't understand the video or her points. Once it became put into law , the American system was based on hereditary slavery. Legal status was based on what your mother's legal status was. If she was enslaved, that was your legal status.
Extreme skin color or phenotype differences existed because of rape and exploitation of Black women and girls..but the legal status of the children didn't change.
 

TheKongoEmpire

A Wilsonian Garveyite
Joined
Jan 3, 2015
Messages
4,951
Reputation
971
Daps
12,101
Reppin
The Original Man and the First Gods
Black passing for White is White..you all love saying how in America youre the race you look like, so those people were White.
I'm glad I'm not the only person who feels that way. It's that one drop foolishness that allows Rachel to go around and tell people that she was black and have black people actually believe it. That was beyond embarrassing. It's funny how we went from being called Tar babies to passing for white.
 

ReturnOfJudah

Veteran
Joined
Nov 25, 2014
Messages
32,309
Reputation
-735
Daps
100,753
Some of you have no idea what Black is.

And, a lot of coli folk come from color-caste societies with 100 different "races" like Brazil. So when they come to America they bring their confusion with them.



House slaves were subjected to rape, violence, and torture from white man, woman, and child.

:snoop:
Where did i lie?
 

StackorStarve

All Star
Joined
May 24, 2022
Messages
1,129
Reputation
296
Daps
4,101
Reppin
Jersey
Those are separate issues.
Why does this only apply to Blacks and no one else??
Im just going by the idea promoted on here that you are what you look like..if a White person looks Black, theyre Black. But if a Black person looks White with blonde hair and blue eyes theyre somehow not White. This is how Europeans managed to keep themselves pure and Blacks mixed to hell.
I think it goes back to the if you have a drop of black blood then you’re black narrative but honestly more than that we come in a lot more shades than other races. I think the only people that have as much range as us complexion wise are Indians. So we’re more accepting of people that don’t necessarily look black that identify as black.
 
Last edited:

Phitz

Superstar
Joined
May 19, 2013
Messages
14,967
Reputation
-4,102
Daps
36,483
Reppin
NULL
I saw a topic on this singer on a forum where she took a dna test and it showed her black ancestry.

How people in the 70s thought this lady was 100% white?


71wt6mPh9XL._UF1000,1000_QL80_.jpg
 

Voice of Reason

Veteran
Joined
Jan 7, 2016
Messages
40,767
Reputation
161
Daps
115,797
Don't understand the video or her points. Once it became put into law , the American system was based on hereditary slavery. Legal status was based on what your mother's legal status was. If she was enslaved, that was your legal status.
Extreme skin color or phenotype differences existed because of rape and exploitation of Black women and girls..but the legal status of the children didn't change.


She has a Black woman in her lineage and that seems to make her uncomfortable based on some of her other videos.
 

Voice of Reason

Veteran
Joined
Jan 7, 2016
Messages
40,767
Reputation
161
Daps
115,797
Rashida would be treated better than the rest of the slaves and would be a house nikka since she come from her slave master's stock. She would also receive education, and inheritance. A lot of Boule and upper class blacks came from that stock and still til this day are the gate keepers for cacs. They claim they speak of behalf of black folks, but they don't fukk with us because they know who their real father is.


A lot of FBA/ADOS have mixed raced people in their lineage.
 

Wiseborn

Superstar
Joined
Feb 16, 2017
Messages
19,402
Reputation
1,555
Daps
44,657
If you wonder why shyt is different Latin America where you'll have white spicy cacs walking around with fatties it's because they stole more Black people for longer than in the states. They started slave raiding in the early 1500's in Latin America needless to say the first slaves in the US came in 1607.

And slavery started gradually starting with indestured servitude so they couldn't afford to lose as many during the washing out process of Bucking and wenching whereas in Latin America there were enough Black people to set up their own Kingdoms in Latin America.

Also the Spanish fukked up by letting Black people keep certain aspects of their culture and not mixing them up more.

The cacs in the contiental US remedied that.
 

2 Up 2 Down

Superstar
Joined
May 4, 2012
Messages
25,175
Reputation
2,289
Daps
58,363
Reppin
NULL
She put out a pretty interesting update video.



Many light skinned at the time made the call to say they were just Italian or something and pretended to be white. Sad, sad nation that has caused endless amounts of suffering and pain.

Didn't watch the video but someone with 11% sub-Saharan isn't and shouldn't be considered "black"
 

Tair

Superstar
Joined
Nov 29, 2019
Messages
5,296
Reputation
2,092
Daps
26,570
Where did i lie?


I would say you aren't correct as opposed to lying. But...

"Children of Uncertain Fortune" by Daniel Livesay
The book's focus is on Jamaica mixed-race people

Often subjected to horrible abuses. House slave children as young as 5 were routinely raped and were reared to be sex slaves to the master of the house and his friends.

The book also details how the 1-drop rule impacted Jamaica vs the U.S... Slavers in Jamaica had to stop the 1-drop rule because their population numbers were dwarfed by enslaved population numbers.

The slavers knew that in order to maintain their system, they'd have to cause a divide. So, they allowed those people with one white parent some privileges so as long as those people of mixed race heritage continued to help maintain the system and have sexual relations with only white people.
So, for instance, a white slaver rapes a slave and the slave has a child. The enslaved woman would petition to her slavemaster to let her mixed-race child go off to Britain to get an education, etc..., the father would allow it. The father would also tell his mixed race son or daughter to marry white and if they do, they'd be given an inheritance. If those children do not, their inheritance would be drastically reduced.

The whole point was to increase white population numbers, and continue their demonic system. Or so the white Jamaican slavers thought.

But in Britain, British people saw an increasing mixed-race (they saw them as Black) population coming to their country, and they outright rejected them on grounds that the mixed-race people would "taint" their bloodline and would lead to the erasure of white Britain.

Over some time whites reduced the privileges of mixed-raced people because whites didn't trust them and felt they were becoming too familiar with the white population. They wanted them as a buffer group that would help maintain white domination and help increase white population numbers, not a group that was equal. So they made a clear distinction on what was white and non-white, and rejected interracial relations to suppress the growing mixed-race population in Jamaica and Britain.

This post is getting long, so you can read the book if you want. I believe a lot of Black people have a very superficial view of Blackness and our lack of understanding of what Black truly means and lack of understanding of white supremacy undermines us more than we think. So much so, I sometimes contemplate abandoning the term altogether.

One thing I know for sure is that creating sub-divisions is what leads to buffer groups and this leads to further entrenching the white power structure which we see in various Latin American countries like Brazil, and African countries like South Africa. The more "pure" white population are on top and the segmented, differing shades of Brown groups are divided on the bottom fighting over scraps.

I saw a topic on this singer on a forum where she took a dna test and it showed her black ancestry.

How people in the 70s thought this lady was 100% white?


71wt6mPh9XL._UF1000,1000_QL80_.jpg

She kind of looks like Eva Mendes
 
Top