the world is untruthful and deceitful = if you can't beat em, join em?
the world is bloody and murderous but no one is excusing that kind of behavior because "it's been going on"
bottom line, you guys think that being in a long term relationship is an excuse for fukked up behavior and that's absolutely ridiculous no matter how well you try to dress it up, it's straight up bullshyt and that same kind of poor rationale can be applied to justify other behaviors.
"well I rob banks because I been out here for 10 years struggling, if you're used to getting meals every day and not going without then you wouldn't understand, go hungry and your opinion on robbing banks will change"
welll since we arent talking about killing or bloody antics thats a bit of a red herring but nice try anyway - if you have to resort to ridiculous comparisons and equating fukking someone who you shouldnt to murder and barbarism then really whats the point of this discussion?
you asked how can someone reconcile having a side piece then you want to launch into a condemnation about how its so bad to have a side piece
miss me with that
the fact is it isnt - what i AM saying is - people being people - we like to say having a side piece is "bad" or "wrong" but the truth is as a society - hell in almost EVERY society - people fukk other people other than who they are supposed to be fukking and that it doesnt mean that they are the worst person or even a very bad person
the reality is men like to fukk other women other than who they are supposed to "only be allowed" to fukk - thats the reality - its a pollyannish view that somehow who ever it is you marry thats the ONLY person you are going to fukk for the rest of your life OR that because you got married that means that some guy ( or gal ) is only going to WANT to fukk you ( or you them ) for the rest of your life and that they will only fukk you
im sorry this is not the reality - its a fantasy about love and monogamy and a whole host of shyt that is an imaginary ideal
if you want to deal with reality then lets have a discussion - if you want to deal with fantasy - well continue to do what you are doing
it doesnt make you :LESS of a man to fukk some girl who is outside of your "primary" relationship - the shyt occurs - fukking JFK roosevelt, muhammed fukking Ali ,Martin Luther King stevie wonder, nelson mandela, countless senators preachers judges and men of industry who are considered and regarded as leaders and great men of ethics and even VIRTUE have had and had many side pieces
thats the reality -
im not saying the shyt is for everyone - or even that its should be socially acceptable as a general rule - but the fact is people want to pretend shyt is not what it is and often want to hold some standard that is unrealistic as if its terrible to acknowledge the contrary as being true
yes there is a double standard - sorry get over it - part of lifeis double standards some small, many large
yes its bad but in the scheme of things its not the worst thing that can ever be done
- women have some fairy tale about what between their legs as if its the end all be all for a guy - sorry honey that just aint so
and some men ( i use that term loosely ) who just STARTED fukking want to act like they know the length and breath of what fukking is all about
like i said
- get in an actual marriage - take a trip to some places other than whatever coffee shop college dorm you think you learned about eh facts of life at - and actually learn something about people and men and women and their relationships
what and how i think - is because of that- and why i am certainly not mystified about people and what they do to have "side pieces "
. So basically the white/jew man censored what the host could say about Ferguson, but its ok to glorify promiscuity to the black youth. Propaganda yall.
All these trash local trap music artist they give play to. I swear, one of the hottest local groups here sounds straight mentally disabled with his adlibs. No diss to the mentally disabled that is just how he sounds.
u find absolutely nothing wrong with this. in the words of steve harvey: "where's your moral barometer?"
