Magic.
Would you have liked me to @ you last game?
I don't see how tagging you last game, as opposed to this game, would change the directive. I mean I could've tagged you after he balled out in their two previous wins, making all those clutch plays, but wouldn't your response be exactly the same, stating why I didn't tag you when they were in 0-2 hole? Are we going to keep doing this cycle, until you actually see that him performing at this level, at this age, was something that Kidd never managed to do. He's not going to perform well in every single game, or win every single game, so I don't see the sense in trying to use that logic as if it takes away from the overall point here. I mean, after all, we are comparing him to Kidd, who was one of the most inconsistent stars of his era.
Because it isn't even remotely close to being the truth. You've already died on this hill, and it seems you want to be a cat and do it another eight times.
I mean, I just posted an infographic of how dominant he's been over
the last five years of the playoffs (not just one meaningless game I conveniently upped the thread for), and yet you've still got your head stuck in the sand. What's it going to take? Five titles and five FMVPs? Is having as many clutch plays as LeBron over an extensive period of time, not enough for you to at least acknowledge that my position has some validity? Is being in the conversation for one of the best PGs (in a time where the position is as deep and talented as ever), and dominating in the playoffs in his mid-30s, not enough for you to at least acknowledge that my position has some validity, when Kidd was a role player at the same stage of his career?