Lolz. More like numerical gerrymandering.
You say that like the opposing party isn't doing relatively the same (and like we all don't do in general), except in this case I have #s to back my stance up. Dudes in here are simply going off the handful of games they watched when they were younger, casual fan talking points and an affinity for the past.
The fact that Lowry had proven himself to be a GREATER and more efficent scorer than Kidd ever did, should tell you from the jump that my position isn't unreasonable at all. If you disagree, fine. But don't act like I've committed basketball treason.
