Lakerman0834
Veteran
at @Gil Scott-Heroin negging me because I said he comes up with his own stats...when it's true
nikka sit at home creating his own stats columns like a nerd...and then references them in debates as if they're valid stats![]()
at @Gil Scott-Heroin negging me because I said he comes up with his own stats...when it's true
nikka sit at home creating his own stats columns like a nerd...and then references them in debates as if they're valid stats![]()
I didn't make up my own stats - I used a # of stats to piece together Jabari's/Randle's assist production. If you actually knew what you were talking about you wouldn't be posting nonsense like you do.
![]()

at @Gil Scott-Heroin negging me because I said he comes up with his own stats...when it's true
nikka sit at home creating his own stats columns like a nerd...and then references them in debates as if they're valid stats![]()

I didn't make up my own stats

For every minute that Randle handles the ball he averages 1.7 assists (surrounded by the likes of D'Angelo, Lou Will and Nick Young)
For every minute that Jabari handles the ball he averages 1.3 assists (surrounded by the likes of Dellavedova, Snell and Henson)
Randle handles the ball for 2.2 minutes per game
Jabari handles he ball for 1.7 minutes per game.

Oh shyt. I forgot about that. @Gil Scott-Heroin created a stat called assists per touches
imagine hearing that off the internet![]()

It was to illustrate that Randle has more opportunities to get assists because he has the ball in his hands more. How hard is that for y'all to comprehend?Really....then what is this "assist per every minute they handle the ball" category that you created???
Create your own stats in order to finesse an argument brehs![]()
There's no "hating" about that, it's putting his "assists" in the right context - rather than overvaluing his playmaking like y'all were doing. Just like y'all were trying to argue that Randle was the "more efficient scorer".nikka sat down to make up a stat SPECIFICALLY to downplay Julius Randle...that's a tier 3 level hater there![]()
I've really got under your skin haven't I?Dude called Emmanuel Mudiay a pure pg despite him averaging more turnovers than assists and called DLO a sg and told me to watch the games.
![]()

It was to illustrate that Randle has more opportunities to get assists because he has the ball in his hands more. How hard is that for y'all to comprehend?
There's no "hating" about that, it's putting his "assists" in the right context - rather than overvaluing his playmaking like y'all were doing. Just like y'all were trying to argue that Randle was the "more efficient scorer".
You're talking about yourself here right? Because you can never claim that I don't think shyt through.You never think shyt out.

Here's the problem with that analogy.No shyt because Randle is a better playmaker. Steve Nash had the ball more in his hands than Shaq and averaged more assists so Nash isn't a better play maker because he had more opportunities?
Go and look at Shaq's assist/turnover ratio, how many assists he averaged with ball in hand and compare them to Nahs's and come back to me.For every minute that Randle handles the ball he averages 1.7 assists (surrounded by the likes of D'Angelo, Lou Will and Nick Young)
For every minute that Jabari handles the ball he averages 1.3 assists (surrounded by the likes of Dellavedova, Snell and Henson)
Randle handles the ball for 2.2 minutes per game
Jabari handles he ball for 1.7 minutes per game.
Jabari has a 1.43 assist/turnover ratio
Randle has a 1.42 assist/turnover ratio
And still none of y'all Lakers fans can address this. Foot on neck. And all that.![]()

It's up thereis this the woat sports opinion of coli history?

Even if you disagree, the very fact that '15/'16 Lowry was a considerably better scorer (by a wide margin) than Kidd was - rules it out from being one of the WOAT sports opinions on this board.It's up there![]()
Gil said it too. He also said Steph Curry was more dominant than MJ last season.
Troll worthy statements.Even if you disagree, the very fact that '15/'16 Lowry was a considerably better scorer (by a wide margin) than Kidd was - rules it out from being one of the WOAT sports opinions on this board.
This is almost as dumb as the initial comment. No one ever praised Jason Kidds ability to score.
