Gil Scott-Heroin
Veteran
Wait...wut?![]()
The argument was centered around a 39-year-old Kareem and how the Warriors could best defend him.
Wait...wut?![]()
The argument was centered around a 39-year-old Kareem and how the Warriors could best defend him.
Nah the "troll worthy statements" are actually the ones where dudes blatantly lie about what you said or take what you said out of context to push some petty ass agenda against you.Troll worthy statements.

What the fukk does this have to do with anything? If Lowry is the flat out better scorer, doesn't that hold weight in a player comparison?
Again, context. Lowry was still struggling with his injury and it's more to do with looking at each player's scoring skillset. Kidd at no point of his career displayed the type of efficiency/scoring ability that Lowry did prior to his injury.When he can't do that thing well when it matters, it doesn't.
Says the guy who has argued that Kobe was better than Jordan :mjklotz:@Gil Scott-Heroin needs to be banned for his trolling smh
Pretty much. He averaged 17/6.7 in 1986-87 in maybe 31 minutes per game. I don't think he even made the all NBA team that year. He was a long way removed from the guy he was even a year or two earlier at that point of his career.Not only would he guard '87 Kareem well, but he'd outplay him too.
Anyone who has an issue with my stance on that is overrating an older Cap who was no longer dominant on a team that had fully transitioned to Magic Johnson. He would give the Warriors all sorts of problems, but 39 y/o Cap not so much.
If we're talking Kareem in his prime with the Bucks or late 70's/early 80's Lakers, that's a different story.
Again, context. Lowry was still struggling with his injury and it's more to do with looking at each player's scoring skillset. Kidd at no point of his career displayed the type of efficiency/scoring ability that Lowry did prior to his injury.

i) Randle's "tight hip" didn't affect his shooting ability, because he basically can't shoot - this is what you don't seem to understandLol @ you mentioning injury when just a few days ago you were shytting on Randle when he had a tight hip.
This is why I say you can't be taken seriously. You use shyt when its beneficial for your argument but when it's beneficial for ous, it's![]()
And @Malta would be right. This version of Lowry is better than Kidd ever was.![]()

Lol bum ass Tristan was feasting on green imagine KAJSays the guy who has argued that Kobe was better than Jordan :mjklotz:
Pretty much. He averaged 17/6.7 in 1986-87 in maybe 31 minutes per game. I don't think he even made the all NBA team that year. He was a long way removed from the guy he was even a year or two earlier at that point of his career.
Five Reasons Draymond Green Should Have Won 2016 DPOYLol bum ass Tristan was feasting on green imagine KAJ
Isn't that what everyone does, and what we're all suppose to do when comparing players? Use a # of stats to piece together who is the better player? What are we just suppose to take one stat and come to the conclusion that a player is better straight off that?
