Nero Christ
Sniper out now on all digital platforms brev
I've been seeing a lot of posts and arguments on here recently about theaters showing foreign films or better yet indie and mid-scale films. While profitability plays a huge role in what is shown in theaters and even decided to be made into a film, I feel the Weinstein Company & Miramax taking them hits also played a huge role in what we're currently seeing with the current state of film.
Now I'm not defending Weinstein at all he deserves to go to jail for the foul shyt he did...The fact is however, his company was the leading one in funding foreign films and making them visible here in the states. Something like City of God may not even be known like it is now without Miramax. Got shown this article a couple of days ago and it hints at how influential they were and getting foreign films seen on a bigger stage and why Americans aren't as interested in them now a days like they used to: The Lonely Subtitle: Here’s Why U.S. Audiences Are Abandoning Foreign-Language Films
the quote I'm talking about
Now this article was written in 2014 way before the Weinstein scandal, but all it (Weinstein scandal) did was speed up the process of American cinema being less willing to take chances on these films. The rest of the article breaks down the necessity for foreign films to be seen in theaters to help them make money.
So what do you guys think about all of this...do you think it is best for these companies to continue to only make safe bets?
do we need another Miramax for foreign films and small & mid-scale films to get to theaters?
Is the argument that the film not being profitable thus not being worthy of theater release flawed?
Now I'm not defending Weinstein at all he deserves to go to jail for the foul shyt he did...The fact is however, his company was the leading one in funding foreign films and making them visible here in the states. Something like City of God may not even be known like it is now without Miramax. Got shown this article a couple of days ago and it hints at how influential they were and getting foreign films seen on a bigger stage and why Americans aren't as interested in them now a days like they used to: The Lonely Subtitle: Here’s Why U.S. Audiences Are Abandoning Foreign-Language Films
the quote I'm talking about
James Schamus“Consider [it] the Miramax effect,” said Music Box Films’ Ed Arentz, who currently has Pawel Pawlikowski’s Polish-language “Ida” in release. “The old Miramax was routinely driving foreign-language box office with unprecedented levels of marketing effort. We saw a reprise with these tactics recently with the French-produced ‘The Artist,’ but from 1987 to 2005, they had 26 or so $1 million-plus subtitled releases.”
While The Weinstein Company continues to invest in foreign-language hits (“The Grandmaster,” “The Intouchables”), it is one of the very few companies that does so. Sony Pictures Classics also remains dedicated to foreign cinema, releasing recent successes such as “Amour,” “A Separation,” and “The Raid: Redemption.”
Now this article was written in 2014 way before the Weinstein scandal, but all it (Weinstein scandal) did was speed up the process of American cinema being less willing to take chances on these films. The rest of the article breaks down the necessity for foreign films to be seen in theaters to help them make money.
So what do you guys think about all of this...do you think it is best for these companies to continue to only make safe bets?
do we need another Miramax for foreign films and small & mid-scale films to get to theaters?
Is the argument that the film not being profitable thus not being worthy of theater release flawed?