"They Don't Know Its Us, Not Like Were The Raiders" Official 2016 Oakland Raiders Off-Season Thread

KingT33

LWO, Raider Nation, Univ of South Central Trojans
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
713
Reputation
519
Daps
1,126
Reppin
A suburb of Los Angeles
Meh, I was fine not throwing 25 Mil at Suh and shyt, but I see no problem with giving 2-3 targeted guys a couple mil extra a year. Like even now I would give hardy 2 mil a year more then his other offers. This way we can bring in guys that people want to play with and who can make an impact. We wasted money on guys like MJD, Schuab, and Woodley. That money could have be used to lure a couple young solid guys
I agree with you on hardy i would give him an extra couple of mil a year but not too much. I would love to see him opposite side to take the pressure off Mack.
 
Joined
Oct 15, 2014
Messages
438
Reputation
400
Daps
1,203
We're not linked to any pass rushers which is our biggest need IMO. Makes me think they're moving Mack to DE.

I know i've called this organization incompetent and Reggie a lazy no good donuting stuffing idiot, but i don't think there that stupid to "fix" something that isnt "broken".
 

Supreme

King
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
155,906
Reputation
26,405
Daps
394,267
Reppin
NC
We're not linked to any pass rushers which is our biggest need IMO. Makes me think they're moving Mack to DE.

Don't know if Mack moving to DE would be a bad thing. If he was at DE would probably mean less tackles but more sacks. I think they should move Mack all over like most teams do with their best linebackers and lineman.​
 

Hater

R.I.P
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
20,250
Reputation
3,831
Daps
48,046
Reppin
Lakers
I know i've called this organization incompetent and Reggie a lazy no good donuting stuffing idiot, but i don't think there that stupid to "fix" something that isnt "broken".
I'm sure he would do well at DE but i just like him better as a linebacker. I want him to be all over the field making plays not strictly rush the passer.

Don't know if Mack moving to DE would be a bad thing. If he was at DE would probably mean less tackles but more sacks. I think they should move Mack all over like most teams do with their best linebackers and lineman.​
I agree but like @NansensuToko if it ain't broke don't fix it. I would much rather see us bring in Johnson or Hardy and have Mack come off the same side with 1 of them.
 
Joined
Oct 15, 2014
Messages
438
Reputation
400
Daps
1,203
I'm sure he would do well at DE but i just like him better as a linebacker. I want him to be all over the field making plays not strictly rush the passer.


I agree but like @NansensuToko if it ain't broke don't fix it. I would much rather see us bring in Johnson or Hardy and have Mack come off the same side with 1 of them.

I agree, he did marvels at LB and id rather him be disrupting shyt all over the field
 
Joined
Oct 15, 2014
Messages
438
Reputation
400
Daps
1,203
The DC going to have to do this because teams will be game-planning around Mack. We need to put him in situations so he can create all types of havoc :blessed:

Its Kenny Jr. He was having dudes in Seattle watch tapes on him, im sure he's well aware of the game planning teams started to take and will change it up

:blessed:
 

mitter

All Star
Joined
Jan 24, 2013
Messages
4,041
Reputation
192
Daps
11,460
Reppin
NULL
It's been a disappointing offseason so far, but in all honesty, how many elite game-changing free agents were even available?

Suh? The Raiders would have had to offer like 130 mil plus 70 mil guaranteed to be competitive (considering CA state tax)

Revis? He was obviously considering only NE and the Jets


After that you got guys like Randall Cobb and Julius Thomas who look better than they are because of their elite quarterbacks. It would have been nice to get someone like that, but the Raiders would have had to overpay massively for guys who would help marginally. Word is they offered Cobb 11 mil per year and he stayed with GB for 10 mil a year. How much should they overpay for a slot receiver who is not really a number one?

Hudson is a good player. Dan Williams is just about as good as Terrance Knighton. I like the additions of Lofton and Smith.



The Raiders may have a lot of cap space, but their inability to use it to acquire superstars is because there just aren't many on the market. Most teams had to settle for consolation prizes.


Let's wait and see how the draft goes. I think the Raiders are trying to build the team the right way. They don't always look good doing it, but I think that has a lot to do with the market and with their limitations (history of losing, poor facilities, etc.). They have the right general idea and are slowly but surely building a foundation for the future.
 

Supreme

King
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
155,906
Reputation
26,405
Daps
394,267
Reppin
NC
Tiki & Tierney discussing us now on how sad our organization is
XLHwPXv.png


Lowest grossing team in the nfl
XLHwPXv.png


I dont give a fukk though, Raider for life
XLHwPXv.png
 
Top