"They Don't Know Its Us, Not Like Were The Raiders" Official 2016 Oakland Raiders Off-Season Thread

blackestofpanthers

God forgives, you are forgiven.
Joined
Aug 19, 2014
Messages
14,773
Reputation
13,955
Daps
89,736
Reppin
Bay area
of all those teams that win without a running game, how many of them have QBs not named Manning, Brady, Brees or Rodgers? Of course you can win without a running game if you have 1 of the greatest QBs to ever play the game on your roster. :beli:
Which great running game did big ben have? Over the hill bettis? Willie Parker? shyt is overstated. It's about the team. Did the ravens beat the niners because of a fukking running game? Did the pats beat the Raiders in tuck game because of a running game?
 

Troublesome

All Star
Supporter
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
5,071
Reputation
935
Daps
6,984
Reppin
NULL
Which great running game did big ben have? Over the hill bettis? Willie Parker? shyt is overstated. It's about the team. Did the ravens beat the niners because of a fukking running game? Did the pats beat the Raiders in tuck game because of a running game?

You mean the 2005 Super Bowl winning Pittsburgh Steelers that had a top 5 ranked defense in both yards and points allowed? :ohhh:You mean the Willie Parker that ran for 1200 yards that same year? :usure:Or how about the 2008 Super Bowl winning Steelers defense that was #1 in both yards and points allowed? :lupe: What about the 2001 Patriots that had a 1100 yard rusher and rated 6th in points allowed? (i'll admit they were rated low in yards allowed):francis: The Ravens had a middle of the pack defense, :ehh: but they had an 1100 yard rusher too. :manny:
 

blackestofpanthers

God forgives, you are forgiven.
Joined
Aug 19, 2014
Messages
14,773
Reputation
13,955
Daps
89,736
Reppin
Bay area
You mean the 2005 Super Bowl winning Pittsburgh Steelers that had a top 5 ranked defense in both yards and points allowed? :ohhh:You mean the Willie Parker that ran for 1200 yards that same year? :usure:Or how about the 2008 Super Bowl winning Steelers defense that was #1 in both yards and points allowed? :lupe: What about the 2001 Patriots that had a 1100 yard rusher and rated 6th in points allowed? (i'll admit they were rated low in yards allowed):francis: The Ravens had a middle of the pack defense, :ehh: but they had an 1100 yard rusher too. :manny:
1200 yards? Word? 1100 yard rusher? :stopitslime:
You can say defense, sure, but running game? That can be done by committee. Your point is not only silly but using guys who ran for barely 1000 yards is hilarious to me. If you're gonna make a running game argument you damn sure can't be using 1100 yard rushers as an argument :heh:. Tighten your arguments up my dude.
 

Troublesome

All Star
Supporter
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
5,071
Reputation
935
Daps
6,984
Reppin
NULL
1200 yards? Word? 1100 yard rusher? :stopitslime:
You can say defense, sure, but running game? That can be done by committee. Your point is not only silly but using guys who ran for barely 1000 yards is hilarious to me. If you're gonna make a running game argument you damn sure can't be using 1100 yard rushers as an argument :heh:. Tighten your arguments up my dude.

I said RESPECTABLE not dominant. And those numbers are from 1 RB off each team. i didn't include the stats from the rest of the committee.

I said Dominant Defense and a respectable running game. My argument couldn't be any tighter, breh.
 

blackestofpanthers

God forgives, you are forgiven.
Joined
Aug 19, 2014
Messages
14,773
Reputation
13,955
Daps
89,736
Reppin
Bay area
I said RESPECTABLE not dominant. And those numbers are from 1 RB off each team. i didn't include the stats from the rest of the committee.
You used that in your post though. If you had to say more then say more my dude. Frank gore wasn't rushing for ridiculous yards for the niners the last few years yet they were super bowl contenders. You can have a great d with a good running game and still make it. Balance is much more important nowadays than it was before and balance isnt even needed like that :heh:.
A lot of you guys' mentality is why the raiders haven't been winning. Guys who will oppose signing a guy like crabs who is guaranteed 900 or more yards in any traditional offense. Hyping up guys who wouldn't even be on a team if it weren't for the raiders. I went through this type of shyt with the warriors for years. Stop overrating your trash.
 

Troublesome

All Star
Supporter
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
5,071
Reputation
935
Daps
6,984
Reppin
NULL
You used that in your post though. If you had to say more then say more my dude. Frank gore wasn't rushing for ridiculous yards for the niners the last few years yet they were super bowl contenders. You can have a great d with a good running game and still make it. Balance is much more important nowadays than it was before and balance isnt even needed like that :heh:.
A lot of you guys' mentality is why the raiders haven't been winning. Guys who will oppose signing a guy like crabs who is guaranteed 900 or more yards in any traditional offense. Hyping up guys who wouldn't even be on a team if it weren't for the raiders. I went through this type of shyt with the warriors for years. Stop overrating your trash.

I said that in a post you replied too :mindblown: and who am I overrating? :wtf: I'm saying Leonard Williams will improve our team more than Cooper. Do you agree or disagree?
 

blackestofpanthers

God forgives, you are forgiven.
Joined
Aug 19, 2014
Messages
14,773
Reputation
13,955
Daps
89,736
Reppin
Bay area
I said that in a post you replied too :mindblown: and who am I overrating? :wtf: I'm saying Leonard Williams will improve our team more than Cooper. Do you agree or disagree?
sooner or later we will all see who the prophet is.
I'll be back here week 10.
This goes for any and every poster doubting my words. Ban bet the next super bowl winner doesn't have a running back run for over 1200 yards unless it's marshawn. I'm all about ban bets. fukk stating your posts without repercussions. If people aren't willing to double down on their posts then they shouldn't be taken seriously.
 

Troublesome

All Star
Supporter
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
5,071
Reputation
935
Daps
6,984
Reppin
NULL
sooner or later we will all see who the prophet is.
I'll be back here week 10.
This goes for any and every poster doubting my words. Ban bet the next super bowl winner doesn't have a running back run for over 1200 yards unless it's marshawn. I'm all about ban bets. fukk stating your posts without repercussions. If people aren't willing to double down on their posts then they shouldn't be taken seriously.

:mjlol:I can do that too. I bet the next team that wins the Super Bowl will have a 1200 yard rusher unless it has a future Hall of Famer at the QB position (Peyton, Brady, Luck, Rodgers or Brees)

My argument this whole time is that if you don't have a HOF QB, you gotta have a dominant defense and respectable rushing game.
 

blackestofpanthers

God forgives, you are forgiven.
Joined
Aug 19, 2014
Messages
14,773
Reputation
13,955
Daps
89,736
Reppin
Bay area
My argument this whole time is that if you don't have a HOF QB, you gotta have a dominant defense and respectable rushing game.
Boy that pats d was for sure dominant :heh:
Put that account on the line and any other account you may have. No games here. I'm not about to go in circles with you.
 

blackestofpanthers

God forgives, you are forgiven.
Joined
Aug 19, 2014
Messages
14,773
Reputation
13,955
Daps
89,736
Reppin
Bay area
So Tom Brady isn't a HOF QB?
All you did was give yourself so many outs. Theres like 6 teams total that have won super bowls without the qualifications. Way to go out on a limb there. Ban bet me, son. We both know I'll get you out of here, that's why you keep duckin. All you're doing is annoying me and making me want to attack you in ways other than ban bets.
 

Troublesome

All Star
Supporter
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
5,071
Reputation
935
Daps
6,984
Reppin
NULL
All you did was give yourself so many outs. Theres like 6 teams total that have won super bowls without the qualifications. Way to go out on a limb there. Ban bet me, son. We both know I'll get you out of here, that's why you keep duckin.

I don't see whats so hard to understand about me saying you have to have a defense and a respectable running game to be successful if you don't have a HOF QB. I don't think Carr is a HOF QB hence the reason to build a defense and rushing attack.

And aint no one ducking. I aint betting cuz I could be wrong. This aint that serious to me. :yeshrug:
 

GPBear

The Tape Crusader
Joined
Mar 9, 2015
Messages
20,111
Reputation
4,839
Daps
67,430
Reppin
Bay-to-PDX
On the real,

Reggie McKenzie is our GM.

Former lineman...

He hired his twin brother as a college scout.

The year he's hired, we were like 8-8. Next year, they fire the coach we slip to 4-12 and been stuck there ever since

I was okay with this, par for the course R-Men. But then...

Our backup QB was Matt Schaub. Matt fukking Schaub. Nah man.

Matt Schaub used to play for a Texas team, and Matt Schaub is from Pittsburgh. Pittsburgh. Immaculate Reception. The ONE fukking team I want removed from NFL history more than anything.

Nah brehs, Reggie Mckenzie has to fukking go. Texas + Pittsburgh in Oakland... :what::snoop::deadmanny:.

Someone get the stickum and Lester Hayes, Dave Casper
 
Top