I dun had women when I was poor af ready to kill themselves over me and women when I had money ready to kill themselves over me.
I understand we wanna protect our kings from harm but to generalize women this way is dangerous and plants the wrong seeds in my opinion. You dont want to have men walking into every relationship expecting a wack heartless woman. It may well always end up a self-fulfilling prophecy
You can't really use your results with women post-notariety to gauge disposition/attitude because you were seen as "greater than" regular guys. That said the article doesn't say women are terrible just that at their core those three concepts guide their actions to some degree.
your woman can be the sweetest most loving girl to you while you're both broke etc etc, if her circumstances change and cause her to value other thing above loving you, then yeah you'd be hard pressed to find that relationship lasting.
the article just wants brothers/men to understand we cannot jump feet first into "love" cause as a concept men and women have different definitions. women call love a feeling, men tend to describe and relate love to some types of actions whereas women often see it purely as a feeling.
feeling are fleeting...
my loyalty to my wife and my willingness to lay my life down for us is how i might measure.
if you ask a woman what love means to her and she can only relate it to her feelings or how love makes her feel, brudda get the fukk outta there. there will be no satisfying her.