I find it so hilarious how quickly arguments can flip flop.
If the argument is who needed more help it's all like "LeBron needed a stacked team full of HOFers to win! Kobe did it without a superstar! Gasol is not a superstar!"
But then if the argument is which team would win if they were matched up the the same people will be like "Pau, Bynum, & Odom would destroy Bosh, Haslem, and a "C@cman"

Artest was still great in 2010 while Wade is flabby and sick in 2013!"
Lol
So which is it did Kobe have a better supporting cast then LeBron or is the Heat the better team? You can't have it both ways.
I don't see anyone saying it would be close so whichever team that would destroy the other obviously has the better supporting cast. And whichever team is the loser had their superstar player win championships with less help.