1994 GQ Article That Sets The Record Straight on the 1993 Michael Jackson allegations

Dynamite James

The Main attraction
Joined
Apr 25, 2018
Messages
18,770
Reputation
3,990
Daps
89,907
Reppin
You know
description below.

drawing-reducted.jpg


It was claimed the diagram was given to Evan Chandler by Jordan, so we are to believe that these notes were the words and writings of a 13-year-old.

However, based on the instructions (eg. “be selective”) and notes like “my theory” it rather seems to be an instructional brainstorming session speculating what Jackson’s private parts looked like. Why would they need to theorize on paper about it if Jordan definitively knew?

Remember that in his book Ray Chandler wrote that in May 1993 Evan injected Jackson in his gluteus. This puts notes like this: “my theory: / ass blotched / shades of / brown – so / how is MJ(?) p. V / be selective / Orietta bleach”, into perspective.

Additionally, consider the references to an “Orietta”. Jackson had a personal assistant named Orietta Murdock whom he fired in 1992 and who then sued the star for unfair dismissal. She no longer worked for Jackson when Jackson spent time with the Chandler family. Why would Jordan Chandler make references to her while describing Jackson’s private parts? Did the Chandlers use information from this disgruntled ex-employee to create their “theory” about Jackson’s skin?

The Chandlers only had to know that Jackson had vitiligo and also conclude, from Evan’s knowledge of how Jackson’s buttocks looked like, that there were discolorations on the lower parts of his body and probably on his private parts. In All That Glitters the following conversation is quoted from November 25, 1993 between Larry Feldman, the attorney who represented Jordan in his civil lawsuit against Jackson, and Evan Chandler:

“Oh, yeah, Lauren Weis* told me today that this disease Michael says he’s got, vitiligo, that it’s capable of changing anywhere you look, so that anything Jordie says is irrelevant. It can change very quickly with this disease.

“shyt, these guys seem to have an answer for everything.”

“No, that’s good for us!”

‘Why?”

“Because if he’s right, he’s right. And if he’s wrong, we’ve got an explanation!”

“Ha!”

“Yeah, it’s a no-loser for us.”

“That’s very good.”

“Good? It’s terrific! You stick with the teeth, kid. I’m sticking’ with the law.” [9; page 202-203]

(Emphasis added.)
 

Dynamite James

The Main attraction
Joined
Apr 25, 2018
Messages
18,770
Reputation
3,990
Daps
89,907
Reppin
You know
(* The Lauren Weis, who is claimed to have told Larry Feldman that anything Jordan says about the blemishes is irrelevant because they are subject to changes, is the same Lauren Weis to whom Jordan gave his original description in September. She was the Los Angeles Deputy District Attorney at the time. In All That Glitters she is also described as a good friend of Richard Hirsch, the attorney who represented Evan Chandler against the extortion charges filed by Jackson [9; page 165].)

In the chapter entitled “December 14” Ray Chandler writes:

“Back in September, Jordie had given a detailed description of Michael’s penis and testicles to the DA. Feldman was aware of this, but had yet to discuss it with his young client. If the description matched the police photos it was one more giant straw on the camels back that was Michael’s defense. And the poor beast was already swayback.

On the other hand, it had been medically established that the markings of vitiligo were subject to change. So if Jordie’s description was wrong, Larry would be able to say the markings had shifted over the months. Either way, Larry’s case was solid as a rock and he didn’t need it. But since the DA was making a big deal over it, Larry had to be sure what, exactly, Jordie had seen.”[9; page 206]

(Emphasis added.)

(The Chandlers claimed the molestations happened in April/May-June, 1993, but Jackson’s genitalia was photographed by the authorities more than half a year later, at the end of December 1993.)

As you can see, the Chandlers cynically played on the fact that vitiligo markings are subject to change and they were preparing excuses for themselves to explain why their description did not match the photographs. However, both the Chandlers and Sneddon failed to acknowledge that if vitiligo markings were subject to change then they are inadequate to prove Jackson’s guilt, especially considering the fact the Chandlers got the circumcision issue completely wrong.

It seems that Sneddon, like the Chandlers, tried to have it both ways: if there was something in that drawing that remotely guessed a location of a marking right (at least according to Sneddon’s own assessment) it would have been used against Jackson, while everything else would have been ignored and/or explained away by the fact that vitiligo markings were subject to change. As Larry Feldman put it: “It’s a no-loser for us”.

Sources:

[1] Plaintiff’s motion to admit evidence that Jordan Chandler had knowledge of, and accurately described Defendant’s distinctively-blemished lower torso and penis in 1994; Declaration of Thomas W. Sneddon, Jr; Memorandum of points and authorities (May 25, 2005)
http://www.sbscpublicaccess.org/docs/ctdocs/052505pltmotchandler.pdf

[2] Maureen Orth – The Jackson Jive (Vanity Fair, September 1995)

[3] Craig Rivera’s interview with Dr. Richard Strick (Fox News, October 2009)


[4] LOS ANGELES : Boy’s Lawyer Seeks Photos of Michael Jackson’s Body (Los Angeles Times, January 5, 1994)
LOS ANGELES : Boy's Lawyer Seeks Photos of Michael Jackson's Body

[5] Jim Newton – Grand Jury Calls Michael Jackson’s Mother to Testify (Los Angeles Times, March 16, 1994)
Grand Jury Calls Michael Jackson's Mother to Testify

[6] The case against Michael Jackson – The Telltale “Splotch” (January 6, 2005)
After Jackson’s autopsy had been released to the public (which among others stated that the singer was not circumcised) The Smoking Gun deleted the article from their website. For a secondary source see: The Case Against Michael Jackson - January 6, 2005

[7] Michael Jackson’s autopsy report as released in 2010
http://www.autopsyfiles.org/reports/Celebs/jackson, michael_report.pdf (page 18)

[8] Cat Saunders – Circumcision in America (originally published in The New Times in October 2001)
http://www.drcat.org/articles_interviews/html/firstcut.html

[9] Raymond Chandler – All That Glitters: The Crime and the Cover-Up (Windsong Press Ltd, September, 2004)

[10] Vitiligo Skin Disorder
curevitiligooil.com Is For Sale

[11] Victor Gutierrez – Michael Jackson Was My Lover (Alamo Square Dist Inc, 1996)

[12] Brett Barnes’ testimony at Michael Jackson’s 2005 trial (May 5, 2005)
https://themichaeljacksonallegationsblog.files.wordpress.com/2016/12/court-transcripts.zip
 

unit321

Hong Kong Phooey
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
22,214
Reputation
1,774
Daps
23,105
Reppin
USA
It was always questionable whether he was not guilty, and Michael Jackson was a weird person off stage, but I felt that he may not have been guilty.
Like the article said, there were no criminal charges and he didn't go through court for what would be a felony case. If you had a child molested, whether by a superstar or every day Joe, I would assume the parent would want the district attorney to do their best to prosecute the suspect. It all got settled out of "civil" court. If MJ were found guilty in criminal court, the civil case would be a walk in the park to win.
The "13 year-old child" is an adult now, and I think he could sell or tell his story.
 

Dynamite James

The Main attraction
Joined
Apr 25, 2018
Messages
18,770
Reputation
3,990
Daps
89,907
Reppin
You know
Not reading all that.

Was Mike a weirdo? Yes.

Did Mike sexually abuse children? I highly doubt it.

Did Mike make some of the greatest music of all time? Absolutely.

That's it for me.

If people feel fit to give labels and give their two cents about this situation, the least they can do is inform themselves. This is in response to another thread. I'm just making information available for this site and people who want to inform themselves.
 

Rhyme n Tekniq

Superstar
Joined
Mar 22, 2017
Messages
3,476
Reputation
3,335
Daps
17,314
soon as I saw all that bullshyt wall of text, Ignore Thread/ OP I might 1 star this bytch for poor thread stucture. OP clearly wants to annoy anybody attemtping to read this shyt.

Mike has already been vindicated, That chapter is closed yet these weirdo cacs keep finding the same , tired provocative topics to repost over and over so they can troll and learn how to manipulate what few black posters are on here


Trash:trash::ahh:
 

KodeBlue

Banned
Joined
Jul 5, 2012
Messages
6,814
Reputation
-588
Daps
16,853
Reppin
Baltimore
soon as I saw all that bullshyt wall of text, Ignore Thread/ OP I might 1 star this bytch for poor thread stucture. OP clearly wants to annoy anybody attemtping to read this shyt.

Mike has already been vindicated, That chapter is closed yet these weirdo cacs keep finding the same , tired provocative topics to repost over and over so they can troll and learn how to manipulate what few black posters are on here


Trash:trash::ahh:

That's because he became a bigger star than their idols: Elvis and The Beatles.
 
Top