You know what's even more hilarious than the 2012 Celtics going 7 games with the 2012 heat?
Wait for it.
THE MIAMI HEAT, WHO WERE STATISTICALLY BETTER IN 2011, LOST IN 6 GAMES TO THE DALLAS MAVERICKS
30.4 on 55%, 15rebs, 3ast, .4stl, 2.4blk (Shaq)
29.4 on 47%, 7rebs, 6ast, 1.8stl, .8blk (Kobe)
10 on 44%, 5rebs, 3astl, 1.9stl, .4blk (Fox)
30 on 50%, 10rebs, 5ast, 1.8stl, .7blk (Bron)
23 on 46%, 5rebs, 4ast, 1.7stl, 1.3blk (Wade)
14 on 49%, 8rebs, .6ast, .4stl, 1blk (Bosh)
This is playoff numbers from 2012 & 2001. Nobody on Miami is stopping Shaq. For yall nikkas talking about fouling him out, don't you think IND, NJ & PHI thought that same thing?
Wade not stopping Kobe either. This the same Wade who only had a good showing vs. Pacers, vs. a Kobe that obliterated San Antonio (48 on 52%, 16rebs) & Sacramento (45 on 55%, 10rebs) then had two huge games vs. Philly.
Bron will get his. It comes down to Bosh because Wade will be gassed trying to stay with Kobe. LA in 6.
Why are you posting these numbers like they matter? Even if they did matter, why are you only posting the top 3 scorers?
So basically you're saying that you have to play the games?
/thread
@ nikkas trynna talk greasy bout Miami goin 7 wit da Celtics when we beat da Thunder in 5 who beat Da Lakers in 5. 
Bosh only played 1 game against Indiana, breh. And he missed half the Boston series. Wade was banged up all year.
Do you fools watch basketball or do you just skim through box scores?
Like how many games it takes to win matters anyway. The Lakers vs the Blazers, Kings, Spurs and Sixers has nothing to do with the 2012 Heat.
You should feel fortunate I'm taking the time to respond to such a dumb ass post.
What I'm saying is that the comparison between
And any other team that isn't a Jordan Bulls team, or a team that could even repeat an NBA championship is completely BASELESS and Asinine.
That's like if I asked if the 2009-10 Lakers could beat the 97-98 Bulls, just based on the premise that they both won
Get some air
The great run that team had has grossly overrated them.
Similar to people picking the Spurs this year because they won 20 straight. Greatest run, but clearly not the greatest team.
2001 Lakers would win in 5. Shaq was too dominant and this current MIA roster can't do anything about it. Young Kobe vs. a hobbled 2012 D-Wade would also be in favor of that Lakers squad."Lebron arguably the best playoff run in history"?
I didn't know you just added up PPG to determine which team is better. I thought there was something called match ups and adjustments and oh... playing.
Guess not. You just add up the numbers from the top 3 players and that's it. Thank you based GAWD.
Stop being a dumbass.
I was painting a picture statistically. Obviously, its about matchups & making adjustments. Surprise. That's two things the Lakers were better at too
Spoelstra can barely decide which box of cereal he wants let alone outwit a coach who had 7 championship rings at the time. Miami matches up bad at C & are questionable at PG, SG & PF. Wade's not holding Kobe. Bron & Wade take too many shots for Bosh to make much of a difference & young Fisher would actually have legs & won't get cooked by Cole or Chalmers. Your only clear advantage is Lebron.
Now stop being a fukking moron
