I wouldn't say that Vince was better (the handling of Daniel Bryan alone disqualifies him from winning a best promoter award), but UFC has indeed been AWFUL at times this year due to oversaturation and overextension. If you're going to give New Japan half of the awards anyway, wouldn't this have to be one of those awards, seeing as they actually expanded successfully in a major way this year?
Also, anyone saying that Japanese feuds should be disqualified from the best feud award because you can't understand what is being said both doesn't watch Puro and has no idea what Puro is even really about (or, really, storytelling in wrestling for that matter). I understand next to no Japanese and can tell you that, say, anything Toru Yano's done has been better than damn near every WWE feud booked this year. Feuding is about far more than just cutting promos, and if you understand that, then you probably understand why these New Japan feuds are winning these awards year in and year out.