WAS THE 2014 AUTO?
No. This is a turbocharged 4-cylinder. It does make a lil' more power, but the old V6 Mustang gets nearly the same gas mileage and is just as quick. The new one probably handles better thoughWas this supposed to be surprising? Shouldn't a V6 be faster than a 4 banger?
Depends on multiple factors.Was this supposed to be surprising? Shouldn't a V6 be faster than a 4 banger?

True....but the new Ecoboost has way more than 230 pound-feet of torque.---at least on the spec sheet.Depends on multiple factors.
A naturally-aspirated 3.7 liter V-6, 304 HP, 280 ft-lbs of torque.
The turbo-charged 2.3 inline-4 makes 314 HP, 230 ft-lbs of torque.
The turbo-charged engine will shift the power band so that the max torque is reached sooner than in the V-6 engine. So, even though the V-6 makes a max of 280, the turbo will hit its 230 ft-lbs before the V-6 hits 230 ft. lbs. in a 0-60 MPH race.
aybe in a 0-120 MPH race, the V-6 may catch up to the inline 4 because the inline-4's powerband has peaked early while the V-6 can continue going up.
Oh 320 ft-lbs.True....but the new Ecoboost has way more than 230 pound-feet of torque.---at least on the spec sheet.
They are going to sell way more V-6 and Ecoboost MustangsI wouldn't buy either v8 or bust...unless it was for a girl then i'd understand
If you can't afford the v8 just get a more practical vehicle that is more comfortable and roomier
435HpWhat the new v8 pushing tho?