You just avoided the fukk out of that question.
Im voting for her regardless. I'm proud of her campaign.
It's the primary. I support her campaign and I will continue to volunteer my time and money for a candidate and policy that I like.
what a retard
we can't accept this! per HL billionaires are #canceled
i remember napoleon crying about bernie not dropping out until like june, i just assume people are aware all 50 states vote. i guess i shouldnt give voters that much credit
discuss whomever, i just think HL is a place where we're supposed to have more discerning conversation about the candidates, and lumping steyer and bloomberg together because of their monetary status fails to take into account they're very different candidatesi actually like steyerfrankly i think he's the best candidate on the stage, from strictly policy. but there's no point in wasting time discussing anyone except bernie or biden
Steyer is better than Bloomberg.are they really though
they're far more similar than they are different
I don't think outright winning Iowa is a must. She's polling in 4th right now, so if she, say, surges to 2nd place win in Iowa and wins New Hampshire, there will be wind in her sails pushing her forward. How the other candidates place is important as well, because it looks like part of her campaign strategy is to be the Goldilocks candidate that unifies all factions of the Democratic Party. Either way, I think people should just support and vote for the candidate they feel is the best person for the job. Playing pundit is overrated.
where? bloomberg's site takes pretty much no positions, it's all high level dem marketing speak and "What i did as mayor". and based on his past political record, he's more conservative than steyer. the similarities stop at "they are billionaires who bought polls"are they really though
they're far more similar than they are different
