Disagree completely.
1. She completely botched the Bernie Bro question. And i am someone who is critical of a lot of his suppers. When you go on MSM the object is to change the narrative. There is a million different counter points she could used. Instead she barley pushed back and let the narrative festered.
2. Her response to Whoopi sayin that she was disrespecting older voters was very weak. She could of address how progressives are protecting social security, and other policies that would help seniors. Instead she calls Nancy Pelosi Mama Bear
not saying she should of attacked Pelosi but again she let a false narrative linger. She also could of pointed out that she is supporting a candidate that is a senior, and make it clear to it is about policy and not age. Bernie is struggling with older voters. You use this as a opportunity to address those issues.
3. Her answer on Bernie being a independent was terrible. She could of pointed out that Bloomberg was a Republican. She also could of pointed out that Bernie has always caucused with the Democrats, and is part of the Democratic leadership in the senate.
I’m never said this interview was going sink his campaign. However a competent surrogate could of counter these bad talking points and left a different impression on the audience. Example: Pramila Jayapal changed the narrative when she went on Bill Maher. Michael Moore changes the narrative when he goes on MSNBC. Nina Turner changes the narrative when she goes on MSM. That the point of going on these shows. If not you are just wasting time.
) but whole another thing to go from Congress to national surrogate in less than 4 years.
