Foxmulder
Superstar
This man will lose 40 states.
What’s wrong with that video? what did he say that’s so outrageous?
This establishment freak out is amazing to watch.
This man will lose 40 states.
This establishment freak out is amazing to watch.
and warren cant get his supportThis man will lose 40 states.
so i guess that means shed lose 42?

Warren is counting on her supporters being 1) too dumb to realize that Bernie doesn't support the filibuster, and that he voted to end it back when Obama was President while Warren voted for it, and 2) the President doesn't control whether or not the Senate rolls back the filibuster.Watching Warren's speeches over the past couple days in Seattle and Denver, she's aggressively going after Bernie on his support for the filibuster meaning he's more talk than action and how she's the progresssive with the actual goods to implement the agenda and get it done. It's her best line of attack against him and I think she's gonna drop it on him during the debate
Whether it will make enough of a difference at this point, I don't know, but I love how if she goes out she's going out swinging. The Unity Grandma Liz era is over, this is blood and teeth Liz![]()
so?Oh shyt. I finally found where this stat came from
Weren't you a Kamala supporter? She's ranked 97 out of 100 breh
Report Cards for 2019 - Joining Bipartisan Bills - All Senators - GovTrack.us
You don't really care about this.![]()
Bernie’s Plan to Thwart the Filibuster Is Needlessly ComplicatedWarren is counting on her supporters being 1) too dumb to realize that Bernie doesn't support the filibuster, and that he voted to end it back when Obama was President while Warren voted for it, and 2) the President doesn't control whether or not the Senate rolls back the filibuster.
She's been giving this speech for a while now. It's going to fail again.
Most Americans are not anti-capitalists.What’s wrong with that video? what did he say that’s so outrageous?This establishment freak out is amazing to watch.
![]()
Good.so?
You were wrong about saying Sanders was higher.
he's not.

so?
You were wrong about saying Sanders was higher.
he's not.
You first. You quite literally lied about Sanders effectiveness.I wasn't arguing that he was higher at that.
I thought you had a phD? Go back and read our discussion again.
Didn’t he ask after they finished reporting?
I posted the stats. I got them from Congress.gov. You can too. It's sad that you're denying facts. Very Trumpian of you.You first. You quite literally lied about Sanders effectiveness.
I show you the stats.
I show you what his peers say
Nothing pierces your fukking bubble of bullshyt.
You're in a cult.
