It won’t. He had strong fundraising last time.
He went from 3% to 45% in that primary.
He's polling consistently in the 15-20% range in a huge field... he's still got a shot!
It won’t. He had strong fundraising last time.
He went from 3% to 45% in that primary.
He's polling consistently in the 15-20% range in a huge field... he's still got a shot!
If Bernie doesn’t win the nomination, I feel like and I may be wrong that @Berniewood Hogan is probably going to spam the forum with nonsense and encourage a 2nd term of Trump to bring on the revolution![]()
Sanders seems quite lucid and healthy for his age, but I was watching a committee hearing on CSPAN recently and was severely dismayed and disturbed by Leahy's cognitive decline. Dude's knocking on the door of senility.Shoot, Pat Leahy, the senior Senator from Vermont is older than Bernie by a year..
Numbers don’t mean shyt if it’s full of people who can’t/won’t vote in primariesI can vote by mail, so I'll be staying home regardless.
If Bernie is the nominee, you're voting Blue No Matter Who, right?
He has more donors than anybody by far.
This means he has more people supporting him by far.
And FEC regulations mean we know this for a fact.
Pollsters pull all kinds of bullshyt and the media adds another layer of bullshyt on top of that.
Funny, I wonder why they don't focus on donor numbers on MSNBC.
A confirmed metric that proves who has the most support.
Hmm. Weird. Wonder why they don't talk about it.![]()
Who gives money to a candidate and then doesn't vote?Numbers don’t mean shyt if it’s full of people who can’t/won’t vote in primaries![]()
Who gives money to a candidate and then doesn't vote?
Who can't vote but gives money to candidates?
The mental gymnastics required to avoid realizing Bernie is our next president.![]()