blotter

All Star
Supporter
Joined
Jul 13, 2015
Messages
2,035
Reputation
870
Daps
11,290
Everyone says he's a paid poster. But who's paying him?
Facebook algorithm encourages people into arguments for clicks. Nap shytposting in theory could generate ad dollars that he gets a cut of.. theory falls apart for me because he drives people away

And still that doesnt explain shyt like highlighting text using the same colors as his WOAT/hall of shame banners. I lean towards mental illness, but leave the door open that it's performance art
 

FAH1223

Go Wizards, Go Terps, Go Packers!
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
80,999
Reputation
10,149
Daps
238,981
Reppin
WASHINGTON, DC
Bernie vs Biden

40ebafd4cdb31c02a4169b63a2004ae4.gif



Faiz worked for Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid.

I'm surprised as the campaign manager he didn't hire more seasoned comms people last year.
 

Dusty Bake Activate

Fukk your corny debates
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
39,077
Reputation
6,048
Daps
132,829
Everyone says he's a paid poster. But who's paying him?
Russians. They’re paying him to whip up all this Louise Mensch propaganda nonsense to scapegoat Hillary’s L.

This primes the rest of us to impulsively dismiss legit fears of Russian interference in future elections, then they move in.

giphy.gif


Next level KGB shyt.
 

No1

Retired.
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
32,141
Reputation
5,447
Daps
73,054
corporate behavior is much bigger than the CEO. if we didn't have sets of structures in place to allow corporations to run roughshod over the government/"law", then we'd have behavioral checks at the institutional, and thus individual, level.
That’s obvious. That’s not my point, and respectfully, as I’ve said before, you have a semi-elitist attitude and think you’re educating people or that you’re above the fray. What you’re doing is a bunch of word salad to obscure the fact that you are situated in corporate America and are uncomfortable with it being victimized. You’re more comfortable acting as if corruption and avarice is a passive activity that one just finds oneself in than the result of individuals at the top who purposefully decide to maximize profits irrespective of the cost. What you fail to realize is that you’re making my point. People are inherently greedy and will look out for self-interest and that is what has occurred over the past 40 years on corporate America. The very reason we need tougher regulations is because there is no such thing as acting in good faith at the top. Our institutions reflect the values of the power brokers in our society. Those at the top have invested heavily to destroy anything that can regulate them. They aren’t passive individuals. They are creating the rules to govern themselves. You think they hire lobbyists for no reason? They donate to candidates for no reason? No, they are actively shaping the environment for that corporate behavior that you speak of.
 

dora_da_destroyer

Master Baker
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
66,887
Reputation
17,280
Daps
275,875
Reppin
Oakland
That’s obvious. That’s not my point, and respectfully, as I’ve said before, you have a semi-elitist attitude and think you’re educating people or that you’re above the fray. What you’re doing is a bunch of word salad to obscure the fact that you are situated in corporate America and are uncomfortable with it being victimized. You’re more comfortable acting as if corruption and avarice is a passive activity that one just finds oneself in than the result of individuals at the top who purposefully decide to maximize profits irrespective of the cost. What you fail to realize is that you’re making my point. People are inherently greedy and will look out for self-interest and that is what has occurred over the past 40 years on corporate America. The very reason we need tougher regulations is because there is no such thing as acting in good faith at the top. Our institutions reflect the values of the power brokers in our society. Those at the top have invested heavily to destroy anything that can regulate them. They aren’t passive individuals. They are creating the rules to govern themselves. You think they hire lobbyists for no reason? They donate to candidates for no reason? No, they are actively shaping the environment for that corporate behavior that you speak of.
you're doing a lot of projecting here, i participate in the conversation as it comes and i have the views i have...no one is here to educate anyone as most people here have very well-informed, or at least well formed, opinions.

i give zero fukks about corporate america, this shyt aint some shyt i love, it pays my bills and i keep it moving. i have no problem with pointing the finger at corporate america, my post did just that. but it points at the institution - the one that says maximize profit. of course people will act accordingly to do that and when you don't enforce any controls or present laws that people can easily circumvent, then you end up with broken institutions.

there are corrupt actors, but the issue is bigger than individuals. if you got rid of jeff bezos today and replaced him with coli poster X, they're going to do the same shyt jeff is doing if they are to deliver on what the corporation, and that role, is tasked to do. so fix the system, and therefore check the actors. of course that comes with replacing people, but it also comes from an overhaul of washington - term limits, money/lobbying - and the laws that come from washington.
 

Oville

Pro
Joined
Jul 24, 2013
Messages
1,047
Reputation
145
Daps
2,159
Man. What a great day. Finally some sanity out there from people who are firmly pushing back against Sanders holy than thou bullshyt.

Dude Hilary is getting killed for this and has Bernie trending positively on twitter

Obama is a progressive who actually likes getting things done.

he knows he's judged on his accomplishments, not his visions.

White progressives dont care about actually getting shyt done.

Well seems like he is getting judged by his accomolishments lately for how feeble they were. By the time he left office Democrats had lost city and state offices all over the country which has led to increased gerrymandering. This is because he chose to focus on a technocratic strategy instead of a movement politics strategy aimed towards shoring up the democratic base.
 
Last edited:
Top