did what? don't yall argue he did a whole bunch of talking in his campaign and then got in office didn't do enough? which is it
if he didn't do enough, then i guess it's our fault, per the bernie school of presidency, we didn't do enough 
Bring up the other ones
The Tea Party was a racist movement.
It's common to have a midterm flip. With Bernie in house hopefully he would be smart enough to reform the DNC to continue to bring out new and younger voters to sustain the party.
Bernie wants more.did what? don't yall argue he did a whole bunch of talking in his campaign and then got in office didn't do enough? which is it
So you're admitting the goal is unrealistic to go from private to public in a 0-100 perspective
this issue is bigger than bernie, but the geographic concentration of dems, especially younger ones, doesn't favor adding progressive seats, and in places where he encourages independents to vote dem, it will likely come from purple counties where more moderate dems win...
The idea that Bernie would just lose seats simply because others lost seats in the past is just an excuse to write off a true backlash against his ideology.Isn't this what historically happens to presidents? Way to go out on a limb there.
I'm talking about the strength of the movement.
Sounds good until you realize the DNC would fight Sanders tooth and nail because they don't want him in that spot. They wouldn't let him take over the way Trump took over the Republican party.
So you're admitting the goal is unrealistic to go from private to public in a 0-100 perspective
Yeah and we ended up with tea party , a worse Mitch McConnell, conservative judges and trump. Fair trade off
So you're admitting the goal is unrealistic to go from private to public in a 0-100 perspective
IMO, the true measure of a backlash against him will be 2024, he's very likely to be a one term president. so will the party fall in line with who he gives his blessing to or will we have another moderate/progressive fight and how charged up will the republicans be, do they take the WH right back. this is what scares me about him and biden (and warren to an extent), spectrum aside, the dems badly need someone who at least on the surface level of age, can be a two termer
no they dont, but if you're keeping the house blue with conservative dems, who don't support your policy, how does that get you to your goal?
