Well, that's factually inaccurate and the fact that Buttibot has a slight delegate lead despite being in a more congested lane (Biden and Klobuchar) is evidence of this. Not that I'm surprised people here would draw the wrong conclusions from the state of the race.
My take is and always has been that this is a center left country and the dems are still a center left party.
The fact that you can't win the presidency without younger more progressive voters doesn't change that. Particularly because the same can be said about any major block of dem voters.
But ultimately I think we agree on this.
Yes, and he also gave money to Republicans as he did with Pat Toomey 2016. I'm not giving him a pass for that especially when it's being argued that he's an actual Democrat over members in better standing.
He did. That's why I often group him with Manchin. I think they operate the same overall spectrum despite being more liberal and conservative in different areas. For example, the environment and gun control.
I don't disagree, the genesis of our back and forth was about your characterization of Bloomberg and Sanders.
I think that Sanders is a good and crafty politicians who has been doing this his entire life. It is sad to me that he doesn't have a larger coalition with a group he's caucused with for 3 decades. Maybe it's because he isn't interested. Maybe it's because it's not in his repertoire, but I think it's a big deal.
At far as bloomberg, I was wrong and thought he was still a dem when he was mayor. But his policies pretty much say to me that he's a billionaire who has a few pet projects but still ultimately holds negative views of minorities and the poor. Still, he'd fall in line with moderate dems because he craves power just like Trump.