2024 U.S. Presidential Election Thread: Donald Trump wins & will return to the White House; GOP wins U.S. Senate & U.S. House

WHO WINS?


  • Total voters
    353

wire28

Blade said what up
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
58,960
Reputation
13,439
Daps
213,726
Reppin
#ByrdGang #TheColi
whichever candidate the Dems named, rather than let the people vote on, was ultimately gonna get roughly the same amount of enthusiasm and excitement :yeshrug: it was simply a matter of replacing biden with a new, young candidate, in a country that's dying to move past biden and trump

it happened, and here we are. kamala or bust
You back on your generic white male like Roy cooper was going to have black woman of all ages busting down the door politicking for him like Kamala :dead:

I’m sure AKA was gonna set up their own PAC to support mark kelly :dead:
 

Piff Perkins

Veteran
Joined
May 29, 2012
Messages
56,151
Reputation
21,657
Daps
306,628
I think Kamala should do interviews and clearly she will...but I also wonder if we're seeing a glimpse into future campaigning. Presidential politics are largely about tribalism and partisan groups, with some alleged independents thrown in the mix wondering who to pick. What if you ran for president like major artists release music: no serious interviews, go on Hot Ones, do the puppy show, appear on a Twitch stream, etc. It's largely a personality contest anyway...what if you simply freeze out traditional media, besides the typical 60 Minutes appearance. Then again does anyone watch 60 Minutes, compared to a decade ago?

The danger in telling traditional media to fukk off is that they'll make it a story, as they're starting to do now. But...what if the answer is just "fukk them"? Does the average voter give a shyt? Who is sitting around saying "I'd vote for Kamala but she hasn't done an interview so I'll vote for Trump."

I'm not saying I agree with this strategy, I'm just wondering if this is the future.
 

br82186

Superstar
Joined
Jul 3, 2018
Messages
16,326
Reputation
1,788
Daps
49,850
this was the RNC republican platform in 1956

ua5dhuY.png


People always fail to say that both parties took drastic turns in the mid to late 60's.
 

wire28

Blade said what up
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
58,960
Reputation
13,439
Daps
213,726
Reppin
#ByrdGang #TheColi
I think Kamala should do interviews and clearly she will...but I also wonder if we're seeing a glimpse into future campaigning. Presidential politics are largely about tribalism and partisan groups, with some alleged independents thrown in the mix wondering who to pick. What if you ran for president like major artists release music: no serious interviews, go on Hot Ones, do the puppy show, appear on a Twitch stream, etc. It's largely a personality contest anyway...what if you simply freeze out traditional media, besides the typical 60 Minutes appearance. Then again does anyone watch 60 Minutes, compared to a decade ago?

The danger in telling traditional media to fukk off is that they'll make it a story, as they're starting to do now. But...what if the answer is just "fukk them"? Does the average voter give a shyt? Who is sitting around saying "I'd vote for Kamala but she hasn't done an interview so I'll vote for Trump."

I'm not saying I agree with this strategy, I'm just wondering if this is the future.
Agreed. Modern day politics is a popularity contest more than ever. fukk traditional media. They will get angry and manufacture a narrative against you so you’ll have to be prepared for that. But it’s all about memes and vibes these days. Ride the wave into the White House. It’s the future. We aren’t going back.
 
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
200,660
Reputation
27,120
Daps
643,528
Reppin
49ers..Braves..Celtics
Like how stupid does he think everyone is. He can't just say 100% he has to say it's more than 100%. Lmao

"People don't know this... but it's actually much HIGHER than 100%.... It's probably 200%... it's crazy.... and that laugh.... my God... We are really in trouble folks, believe me.."

president-donald-trump-wrong-speaking-moving-hand-8g0675f1xlm54zny.gif
 

ill_will82

What you see, is what you get
Joined
Dec 2, 2016
Messages
10,610
Reputation
2,934
Daps
24,858
I think Kamala should do interviews and clearly she will...but I also wonder if we're seeing a glimpse into future campaigning. Presidential politics are largely about tribalism and partisan groups, with some alleged independents thrown in the mix wondering who to pick. What if you ran for president like major artists release music: no serious interviews, go on Hot Ones, do the puppy show, appear on a Twitch stream, etc. It's largely a personality contest anyway...what if you simply freeze out traditional media, besides the typical 60 Minutes appearance. Then again does anyone watch 60 Minutes, compared to a decade ago?

The danger in telling traditional media to fukk off is that they'll make it a story, as they're starting to do now. But...what if the answer is just "fukk them"? Does the average voter give a shyt? Who is sitting around saying "I'd vote for Kamala but she hasn't done an interview so I'll vote for Trump."

I'm not saying I agree with this strategy, I'm just wondering if this is the future.
The way I'm looking at the strategy that Kamala's team is going with so far is working. I think after the DNC & September debate we will probably start getting some interviews from Harris and Walz. Trump keeps doing news conferences and every time he does them he either says some ignorant or they are filled w/lies or incorrect statements. Vance is no better because more dirt continues to drop on him.
 
Top