Your appreciation makes it all worth it.We know youre smart too.We're just appreciating the effort and detail this man put into his posts.

Your appreciation makes it all worth it.We know youre smart too.We're just appreciating the effort and detail this man put into his posts.
So you disagree because pseudo science is basically a fraud.Don't see links or references, reads like pseudoscience.
I've been thinking I ought to rep you, lately....Your appreciation makes it all worth it.
![]()
ThanksI've been thinking I ought to rep you, lately....
The women who are really interested in you will drop so many seeds (details) on what they like that you can bring enough together to make it happen regardless of $. (Unless her seeds are expensive things.)Can I get away with something relatively cheap but detailed to her preferences...must it be lavish or must it be both?
So it's a matter of women being detail oriented and having an aversion to encountering issues while men are direct while having an affinity to dealing with them head on.
Now if I want it connect on a deep level I need to be detail oriented and subtle with all of the idiosyncrasies that go into the interactions with the I'm dealing with.
Okay...I'll get back to that later but this is a little ehh:
they're [women] designed to appreciate material things in which I'm to embrace. "Forgoing mental compatibility" seems vague and doesn't really do much to help me discern wether or not she's embracing her femininity or just looking for a come up. I have an issue with this because part of the courting process involves not only focusing on detail, (e.g. hobbies, pet peeves, preferences of the woman etc.) but also incorporating them into dates that help the woman determine whether or not she is to be "compatible". Can I get away with something relatively cheap but detailed to her preferences...must it be lavish or must it be both?
Now I know this is the coli..but people (men and women) have made a point to mention how:
No shade but the internet has too many answers.
- If a girl really likes you the venue/date doesn't matter; and
- Unless you're wealthy, going "all out" at the onset of a possible relationship is settingg yourself up for failure due to the standard by which everything else will follow
So it's a matter of women being detail oriented and having an aversion to encountering issues while men are direct while having an affinity to dealing with them head on.
Now if I want it connect on a deep level I need to be detail oriented and subtle with all of the idiosyncrasies that go into the interactions with the I'm dealing with.
Okay...I'll get back to that later but this is a little ehh:
they're [women] designed to appreciate material things in which I'm to embrace. "Forgoing mental compatibility" seems vague and doesn't really do much to help me discern wether or not she's embracing her femininity or just looking for a come up. I have an issue with this because part of the courting process involves not only focusing on detail, (e.g. hobbies, pet peeves, preferences of the woman etc.) but also incorporating them into dates that help the woman determine whether or not she is to be "compatible". Can I get away with something relatively cheap but detailed to her preferences...must it be lavish or must it be both?
Now I know this is the coli..but people (men and women) have made a point to mention how:
No shade but the internet has too many answers.
- If a girl really likes you the venue/date doesn't matter; and
- Unless you're wealthy, going "all out" at the onset of a possible relationship is setting yourself up for failure due to the standard by which everything else will follow
To add...I see nothing wrong with embracing each of these roles as equal/two sides of a coin...it's just a matter of applying this logic/perspective to this generation...like I now have to search for a unicorn that passes the minimum threshold of holding this view as well. Most 20-something's aren't paying credence to this idea (men and women) so outside of an ideal that's just a hypothetical...what incentive is there to embrace this view?