.

At30wecashout

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Sep 2, 2014
Messages
37,294
Reputation
18,910
Daps
172,272
We know youre smart too. :lolbron: We're just appreciating the effort and detail this man put into his posts.
Your appreciation makes it all worth it.
mjcrycard.png
 

iBrowse

NAH
Supporter
Joined
Apr 18, 2013
Messages
46,780
Reputation
15,690
Daps
118,357
So it's a matter of women being detail oriented and having an aversion to encountering issues while men are direct while having an affinity to dealing with them head on.

Now if I want it connect on a deep level I need to be detail oriented and subtle with all of the idiosyncrasies that go into the interactions with the I'm dealing with.


Okay...I'll get back to that later but this is a little ehh:

:shaq2: they're [women] designed to appreciate material things in which I'm to embrace. "Forgoing mental compatibility" seems vague and doesn't really do much to help me discern wether or not she's embracing her femininity or just looking for a come up. I have an issue with this because part of the courting process involves not only focusing on detail, (e.g. hobbies, pet peeves, preferences of the woman etc.) but also incorporating them into dates that help the woman determine whether or not she is to be "compatible". Can I get away with something relatively cheap but detailed to her preferences...must it be lavish or must it be both?

Now I know this is the coli..but people (men and women) have made a point to mention how:

  • If a girl really likes you the venue/date doesn't matter; and
  • Unless you're wealthy, going "all out" at the onset of a possible relationship is setting yourself up for failure due to the standard by which everything else will follow
No shade but the internet has too many answers.
 

iBrowse

NAH
Supporter
Joined
Apr 18, 2013
Messages
46,780
Reputation
15,690
Daps
118,357
To add...I see nothing wrong with embracing each of these roles as equal/two sides of a coin...it's just a matter of applying this logic/perspective to this generation...like I now have to search for a unicorn that passes the minimum threshold of holding this view as well. Most 20-something's aren't paying credence to this idea (men and women) so outside of an ideal that's just a hypothetical...what incentive is there to embrace this view?
 

Ello_Vee

Pro
Joined
Oct 20, 2014
Messages
988
Reputation
590
Daps
2,205
Can I get away with something relatively cheap but detailed to her preferences...must it be lavish or must it be both?
The women who are really interested in you will drop so many seeds (details) on what they like that you can bring enough together to make it happen regardless of $. (Unless her seeds are expensive things.)

I love receiving flowers. But only the men I want to know that, will hear me say it.
 

Software

RIP Future Gohan
Joined
Jan 20, 2014
Messages
13,687
Reputation
3,414
Daps
56,700
Reppin
Swole Gang
http://img4.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20140821030229/walkingdead/images/6/68/Whatthefukk-did-i-just-read.jpg

giphy.gif
 

Kenny West

Veteran
Joined
May 29, 2012
Messages
25,215
Reputation
6,149
Daps
93,034
Reppin
NULL
So it's a matter of women being detail oriented and having an aversion to encountering issues while men are direct while having an affinity to dealing with them head on.

Now if I want it connect on a deep level I need to be detail oriented and subtle with all of the idiosyncrasies that go into the interactions with the I'm dealing with.


Okay...I'll get back to that later but this is a little ehh:

:shaq2: they're [women] designed to appreciate material things in which I'm to embrace. "Forgoing mental compatibility" seems vague and doesn't really do much to help me discern wether or not she's embracing her femininity or just looking for a come up. I have an issue with this because part of the courting process involves not only focusing on detail, (e.g. hobbies, pet peeves, preferences of the woman etc.) but also incorporating them into dates that help the woman determine whether or not she is to be "compatible". Can I get away with something relatively cheap but detailed to her preferences...must it be lavish or must it be both?

Now I know this is the coli..but people (men and women) have made a point to mention how:

  • If a girl really likes you the venue/date doesn't matter; and
  • Unless you're wealthy, going "all out" at the onset of a possible relationship is settingg yourself up for failure due to the standard by which everything else will follow
No shade but the internet has too many answers.

feels like you missed the point but idk. the detail oriented point is more about how women communicate romantically/sexually. Basically how to flirt. It's best done subtle and nuanced.


I have my own little disagreements too but I don't really feel like debating. Some of the things attributed to female nature (materialism) are the result of social engineering itself. Also some disagreements between sexes are not results of social engineering but due to values that aren't shared by the other side which could make them irreconcilable. For instance woman don't shun emotional manipulation of males especially if they feel it's justified, while men [who have spines] won't accept those sort of betrayals regardless of the circumstance. Or how women can't accept a man making use of their physical power over them while men have to accept that survival of the strongest principle due to it being much more active in their reality.
 

CinnaSlim

Queen of Swords
Joined
Jan 28, 2014
Messages
17,078
Reputation
14,250
Daps
60,745
Reppin
East of Anywhere
So it's a matter of women being detail oriented and having an aversion to encountering issues while men are direct while having an affinity to dealing with them head on.

Now if I want it connect on a deep level I need to be detail oriented and subtle with all of the idiosyncrasies that go into the interactions with the I'm dealing with.


Okay...I'll get back to that later but this is a little ehh:

:shaq2: they're [women] designed to appreciate material things in which I'm to embrace. "Forgoing mental compatibility" seems vague and doesn't really do much to help me discern wether or not she's embracing her femininity or just looking for a come up. I have an issue with this because part of the courting process involves not only focusing on detail, (e.g. hobbies, pet peeves, preferences of the woman etc.) but also incorporating them into dates that help the woman determine whether or not she is to be "compatible". Can I get away with something relatively cheap but detailed to her preferences...must it be lavish or must it be both?

Now I know this is the coli..but people (men and women) have made a point to mention how:

  • If a girl really likes you the venue/date doesn't matter; and
  • Unless you're wealthy, going "all out" at the onset of a possible relationship is setting yourself up for failure due to the standard by which everything else will follow
No shade but the internet has too many answers.

Im not sure if I understood your question but you can be detailed without being lavish. Remembering the little details that she likes,such as her favorite color, favorite food, where you first met, etc, and incorporating those details into dates will go a long way without you having to go over budget.

It all depends on a girls standards, how low budget she'll accept.

Also, forgoing mental compatibility just means, pay attention to whether she loves you or what you can give her. It will show in her priorities. Does she get excited after spending time cuddled up with you, having a great conversation or does she get more excited when you give her a gift or bust out the wallet?

If she seems uninterested in you and what you have to say, but spends the majority of the convo asking questions about your job, income, car or credit then she's probably looking for a come up.
 

CinnaSlim

Queen of Swords
Joined
Jan 28, 2014
Messages
17,078
Reputation
14,250
Daps
60,745
Reppin
East of Anywhere
To add...I see nothing wrong with embracing each of these roles as equal/two sides of a coin...it's just a matter of applying this logic/perspective to this generation...like I now have to search for a unicorn that passes the minimum threshold of holding this view as well. Most 20-something's aren't paying credence to this idea (men and women) so outside of an ideal that's just a hypothetical...what incentive is there to embrace this view?

This might sound like spiritual mumbo jumbo but to me the incentive is that it is the truth.

When you live in your truth, you are at peace because you are aligned with your nature. Most of the people fighting against it are the ones who are unhappy and are looking for peace and happiness in other people or achievements.

Dont get discouraged and believe that there is no one out there. Many people know that men and women are masculine and feminine, aggressive and passive, macro and micro. They just make the simple mistake of seeing the two in a hierachy instead of on equal ground. Maybe if you were to explain it to them in this way it would click.

But really there are many people who do agree with this message. Try to be patient and positive.
 
Top