That's what they want you to believe. I don't buy it. You talk to any Gamestop employee and they'll tell you how many people bought TLOU with money they got from trade-ins. MS has to prove they'll be more like Steam than like GoD. I'm not going to have blind faith in that and say that MS should go all digital or abandon all used sales.I don't think Kindness and business mix. but the reality is if they stopped used game sales and lowered prices the games would likely sell more. If you sell more that's more you make off DLC. If you can't sell your game its more likely you are going to purchase that DLC..
That's what they want you to believe. I don't buy it. You talk to any Gamestop employee and they'll tell you how many people bought TLOU with money they got from trade-ins. MS has to prove they'll be more like Steam than like GoD. I'm not going to have blind faith in that and say that MS should go all digital or abandon all used sales.
this is the same article that came out last month. if they were serious about a cheaper gaming price, they would lead with that instead of the kinect and always online. my thing is this, we all know how greedy M$ is. what would be their motive to lower gaming prices to $35 after they've removed used games? why would they just decide "hey, you know what we should do? let's cut our profits!"
All the proponents of this online requirement kept saying games would be cheaper... Why didnt Microsoft announce that all their first party games would be cheaper than e 60$ retail game
Not only is it a wishful number...this is MICROSOFT. Their message, presentation, and responses were ALL over the fukking place.seems like a pretty hypothetical situation. most 'AAA' games on Steam aren't that cheap at launch. granted some of that probably has to do with 'price-fixing', and these companies not wanting one platform to be significantly cheaper than the others. but still $35 seems like a very wishful number