DaddyFresh
Superstar
Huckabee, spicer need to get inducted too. It should be illegal to blatantly lie on the podium when it is not for national security reasons.and all the Clinton defecting they do is borderline obstruction of justice.
45РОССИЯ—ASSANGE CHRGD W/ SPYING—DJT IMPEACHED TWICE-US TREASURY SANCTS KILIMNIK AS RUSSIAN AGNT
- Thread starter ☑︎#VoteDemocrat
- Start date
MUST READ. When Mueller hired this guy, I knew Trump was about to be in some shyt.
Andrew Weissmann, Mueller’s Legal Pit Bull
Andrew Weissmann, second from left, and other members of Robert S. Mueller III’s legal team outside the United States Courthouse in Washington in September.
By MATT FLEGENHEIMER
OCTOBER 31, 2017
WASHINGTON — The target was a New York City titan — plain-spoken but Teflon, irresistible to the tabloids and insistent upon loyalty from his associates.
The defendant, Vincent “the Chin” Gigante, had accumulated power as the head of the Genovese crime family, feigning insanity to conceal his guilt. A prosecutor in Brooklyn was at last prepared to cut him down, using witnesses the government had flipped.
“He couldn’t stop people from talking about him,” the prosecutor, Andrew Weissmann, said of Mr. Gigante, addressing jurors at the end of a career-making federal court case in 1997. “When there’s a large organization to run, you cannot erase yourself from the minds, and more important the tongues, of your conspirators.”
Two decades later, Mr. Weissmann has turned his attention to a more prominent set of prospective conspirators: He is a top lieutenant to Robert S. Mueller III on the special counsel investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election and possible links to the Trump campaign. Significantly, Mr. Weissmann is an expert in converting defendants into collaborators — with either tactical brilliance or overzealousness, depending on one’s perspective.
It is not clear if President Trump and his charges fear Mr. Weissmann as they gird for the slog ahead. It is quite clear, former colleagues and opponents say, that they should.
“I’m no fan of Donald Trump,” said Dan Cogdell, a Houston defense lawyer who tangled with Mr. Weissmann when Mr. Weissmann helped lead the federal task force investigating Enron in the early 2000s. “Frankly, I can’t think of two people who deserve each other more than Andrew Weissmann and Donald Trump.”
If Mr. Mueller is the stern-eyed public face of the investigation, Mr. Weissmann, 59, is its pounding heart, a bookish, legal pit bull with two Ivy League degrees, a weakness for gin martinis and classical music and a list of past enemies that includes professional killers and white-collar criminals.
Empowered by Mr. Mueller, for whom he previously worked as general counsel at the F.B.I., Mr. Weissmann has taken the lead in the government’s case against Paul Manafort, Mr. Trump’s former campaign chairman, whose indictment jolted the capital on Monday in a clear signal of the team’s seriousness.
Mr. Weissmann could be seen at an initial hearing in Washington with an easy smile, chatting up Mr. Manafort’s lawyer during a break in the action.
Friends describe Mr. Weissmann as relentless and boundary-grazing but fundamentally fair, a creative legal strategist whose hyperdiligence should not be confused with recklessness.
He is the prosecutor they would want if their relatives were charged with crimes they did not commit, they say, and the one they would dread if their family members were guilty.
“If there’s something to find, he’ll find it,” said Katya Jestin, a former colleague in the United States attorney’s office for the Eastern District of New York, who called Mr. Weissmann’s ethics unimpeachable. “If there’s nothing there, he’s not going to cook something up.”
But many defense lawyers have chafed at what they see as a scorched-earth approach, forged in Brooklyn while facing down Mafia members and refined on the government’s unit of Enron superprosecutors, which left a mixed legacy of high-profile successes, overturned convictions and one unanimous defeat at the Supreme Court.
It was Mr. Weissmann and his team who stunned Houston society by charging the wife of Enron’s chief financial officer with tax fraud, applying pressure on the executive, who became a star witness.
It was Mr. Weissmann, more recently, who oversaw the predawn raid of Mr. Manafort’s Virginia residence in July, when federal agents picked his lock and prosecutors communicated their intention to indict him.
When that moment came this week, representatives for Mr. Manafort and his longtime associate Rick Gates were given little warning: Prosecutors bypassed the common Justice Department practice of inviting lawyers to meet and discuss potential indictments beforehand, often an opportunity for the defense to argue for leniency and for prosecutors to identify potential holes in their case. As of Friday, people close to both men said they had received no indication that an indictment was imminent.
And while Mr. Mueller has remained the chief villain in the eyes of the president’s allies in conservative news media, efforts to discredit Mr. Weissmann have picked up. For months, Mr. Trump’s defenders have sought to draw attention to thousands of dollars in past donationsfrom Mr. Weissmann to Democrats, including former President Barack Obama.
Then came the shock-and-awe raid of Mr. Manafort’s home — a Weissmann special, both admirers and critics recognized — the Zorro “Z” to announce his presence in the case.
“There’s a name,” the conservative radio host Rush Limbaugh warned listeners last week, recapping the “intimidating technique” afoot. “Weissmann.”
Prosecuting Mob Bosses
Prosecution can make strange bedfellows. And still this alliance stood out.
On one end of the negotiating table sat Mr. Weissmann, the Princeton-educated son of a psychologist and a research scientist who is credited with codiscovering, and coining the term, liposomes.
On the other was Salvatore Gravano, a hitman-turned-informant better known as Sammy the Bull.
Mr. Weissmann and his team used Mr. Gravano as an explosive ally in their bid to prosecute high-ranking mobsters.
In the case of Mr. Gigante, Mr. Weissmann and his colleagues leaned on Mr. Gravano’s testimony, in large part, to dismantle a long-held insanity defense. Mr. Gigante, nicknamed “The Oddfather,” had been known to wander Greenwich Village in a bathrobe and pajamas, mumbling incoherently, tending to a feigned image of incompetence and cluelessness. “I’ve invested many years in this crazy act,” Mr. Gravano quoted Mr. Gigante as saying during court proceedings.
Mr. Weissmann, who declined to be interviewed for this article, even demonstrated that Mr. Gigante’s bathrobes were chosen with care: In public, his coverings were soiled and tattered. Inside, he slipped into something pristine.
“They respected him,” George A. Stamboulidis, Mr. Weissmann’s trial partner, said of his colleague and their mob witnesses. “He’s very bright and to the point but also has a pretty good read of his audience. It was definitely a relationship of mutual respect.”
Geoffrey S. Mearns, a former prosecutor in the Eastern District who is now the president of Ball State University in Indiana, said Mr. Weissmann’s personality mirrored that of the office — with its collection of scrappy, ambitious obsessives out to prove their relative mettle in a city where another office, the Southern District in Manhattan, was often viewed as more prestigious.
That their targets were some of the city’s most fearsome murderers tended to focus the mind, as well.
“He was trained in this environment that we were essentially going after these entrenched mob bosses,” Mr. Mearns said. “He’s trained as a prosecutor to be aggressive.”
‘I Don’t Drink Evian’
The locals did not all take well to their visitors from the federal government, dispatched to Houston after the collapse of Enron to investigate and prosecute the company’s fraud.
“Out-of-town, carpetbagging, Evian-swilling Department of Justice lawyers,” read one description in The Houston Chronicle.
This was an outrage, Mr. Weissmann told a reporter then. “I don’t drink Evian.”
It was this swagger that helped define the government’s posture as the task force went about its work, first with Mr. Weissmann as deputy director, then later as director. (Mr. Mueller, as F.B.I. director at the time, helped form the group.)
Their triumphs were many: With little precedent for such a complex inquiry into financial wrongdoing, the team won indictments and prison terms for almost all of the company’s top executives.
Mr. Weissmann was credited with acting on a hunch that Ben F. Glisan Jr., the former Enron treasurer who had already pleaded guilty without agreeing to cooperate, might be willing to say more. United States marshals hauled in Mr. Glisan from prison, at Mr. Weissmann’s direction, to appear before a grand jury. He became a key witness.
Prosecutors also initially earned a conviction of Arthur Andersen, an accounting firm charged with illegally destroying documents related to its audit of Enron, for obstruction of justice.
Colleagues praised his resourcefulness and legal guile. Opponents accused him of overreach, citing a series of overturned convictions and higher-court losses. Among the setbacks for the task force, the Arthur Andersen victory was unanimously overturned by the Supreme Court over a narrow issue involving jury instructions. Long before that outcome, the case had drawn ferocious criticism from members of the business community, who argued that the indictment alone amounted to a death sentence for the firm.
“It’s pretty clear that Weissmann created a culture in which they presumed that the people they were investigating were guilty,” said Tom Kirkendall, a Houston defense lawyer who represented clients on Enron-related cases.
This reputation has trailed Mr. Weissmann among some defense lawyers in the years since, propagated most vocally by a lawyer and author, Sidney Powell, whose work has been taken up by Trump allies like Newt Gingrich. (In 2015, Ms. Powell criticized Mr. Weissmann in an article for The New York Observer — which was owned by Jared Kushner, Mr. Trump’s son-in-law — after Mr. Weissmann was named to lead the Justice Department’s criminal fraud section.)
But those close to Mr. Weissmann — and some others less inclined to appreciate the work of prosecutors generally — have zealously defended his ethical compass.
Peter Neufeld, a civil rights lawyer and a founder of the Innocence Project, praised Mr. Weissmann’s nerve during his time at the F.B.I., as the agency grappled with the fallout of exonerations based on erroneous testimony from forensic hair examiners.
“He realized that what had gone on in the past was wrong,” Mr. Neufeld said, recalling Mr. Weissmann’s decision to order an audit of hundreds of convictions that may have relied on faulty testimony. “He did it. That was transformative.”
By 2013, both Mr. Weissmann and Mr. Mueller had left the agency. It seemed unlikely that they would partner again.
Then came the call last spring.
Andrew Weissmann, Mueller’s Legal Pit Bull
Andrew Weissmann, second from left, and other members of Robert S. Mueller III’s legal team outside the United States Courthouse in Washington in September.By MATT FLEGENHEIMER
OCTOBER 31, 2017
WASHINGTON — The target was a New York City titan — plain-spoken but Teflon, irresistible to the tabloids and insistent upon loyalty from his associates.
The defendant, Vincent “the Chin” Gigante, had accumulated power as the head of the Genovese crime family, feigning insanity to conceal his guilt. A prosecutor in Brooklyn was at last prepared to cut him down, using witnesses the government had flipped.
“He couldn’t stop people from talking about him,” the prosecutor, Andrew Weissmann, said of Mr. Gigante, addressing jurors at the end of a career-making federal court case in 1997. “When there’s a large organization to run, you cannot erase yourself from the minds, and more important the tongues, of your conspirators.”
Two decades later, Mr. Weissmann has turned his attention to a more prominent set of prospective conspirators: He is a top lieutenant to Robert S. Mueller III on the special counsel investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election and possible links to the Trump campaign. Significantly, Mr. Weissmann is an expert in converting defendants into collaborators — with either tactical brilliance or overzealousness, depending on one’s perspective.
It is not clear if President Trump and his charges fear Mr. Weissmann as they gird for the slog ahead. It is quite clear, former colleagues and opponents say, that they should.
“I’m no fan of Donald Trump,” said Dan Cogdell, a Houston defense lawyer who tangled with Mr. Weissmann when Mr. Weissmann helped lead the federal task force investigating Enron in the early 2000s. “Frankly, I can’t think of two people who deserve each other more than Andrew Weissmann and Donald Trump.”
If Mr. Mueller is the stern-eyed public face of the investigation, Mr. Weissmann, 59, is its pounding heart, a bookish, legal pit bull with two Ivy League degrees, a weakness for gin martinis and classical music and a list of past enemies that includes professional killers and white-collar criminals.
Empowered by Mr. Mueller, for whom he previously worked as general counsel at the F.B.I., Mr. Weissmann has taken the lead in the government’s case against Paul Manafort, Mr. Trump’s former campaign chairman, whose indictment jolted the capital on Monday in a clear signal of the team’s seriousness.
Mr. Weissmann could be seen at an initial hearing in Washington with an easy smile, chatting up Mr. Manafort’s lawyer during a break in the action.
Friends describe Mr. Weissmann as relentless and boundary-grazing but fundamentally fair, a creative legal strategist whose hyperdiligence should not be confused with recklessness.
He is the prosecutor they would want if their relatives were charged with crimes they did not commit, they say, and the one they would dread if their family members were guilty.
“If there’s something to find, he’ll find it,” said Katya Jestin, a former colleague in the United States attorney’s office for the Eastern District of New York, who called Mr. Weissmann’s ethics unimpeachable. “If there’s nothing there, he’s not going to cook something up.”
But many defense lawyers have chafed at what they see as a scorched-earth approach, forged in Brooklyn while facing down Mafia members and refined on the government’s unit of Enron superprosecutors, which left a mixed legacy of high-profile successes, overturned convictions and one unanimous defeat at the Supreme Court.
It was Mr. Weissmann and his team who stunned Houston society by charging the wife of Enron’s chief financial officer with tax fraud, applying pressure on the executive, who became a star witness.
It was Mr. Weissmann, more recently, who oversaw the predawn raid of Mr. Manafort’s Virginia residence in July, when federal agents picked his lock and prosecutors communicated their intention to indict him.
When that moment came this week, representatives for Mr. Manafort and his longtime associate Rick Gates were given little warning: Prosecutors bypassed the common Justice Department practice of inviting lawyers to meet and discuss potential indictments beforehand, often an opportunity for the defense to argue for leniency and for prosecutors to identify potential holes in their case. As of Friday, people close to both men said they had received no indication that an indictment was imminent.
And while Mr. Mueller has remained the chief villain in the eyes of the president’s allies in conservative news media, efforts to discredit Mr. Weissmann have picked up. For months, Mr. Trump’s defenders have sought to draw attention to thousands of dollars in past donationsfrom Mr. Weissmann to Democrats, including former President Barack Obama.
Then came the shock-and-awe raid of Mr. Manafort’s home — a Weissmann special, both admirers and critics recognized — the Zorro “Z” to announce his presence in the case.
“There’s a name,” the conservative radio host Rush Limbaugh warned listeners last week, recapping the “intimidating technique” afoot. “Weissmann.”
Prosecuting Mob Bosses
Prosecution can make strange bedfellows. And still this alliance stood out.
On one end of the negotiating table sat Mr. Weissmann, the Princeton-educated son of a psychologist and a research scientist who is credited with codiscovering, and coining the term, liposomes.
On the other was Salvatore Gravano, a hitman-turned-informant better known as Sammy the Bull.
Mr. Weissmann and his team used Mr. Gravano as an explosive ally in their bid to prosecute high-ranking mobsters.
In the case of Mr. Gigante, Mr. Weissmann and his colleagues leaned on Mr. Gravano’s testimony, in large part, to dismantle a long-held insanity defense. Mr. Gigante, nicknamed “The Oddfather,” had been known to wander Greenwich Village in a bathrobe and pajamas, mumbling incoherently, tending to a feigned image of incompetence and cluelessness. “I’ve invested many years in this crazy act,” Mr. Gravano quoted Mr. Gigante as saying during court proceedings.
Mr. Weissmann, who declined to be interviewed for this article, even demonstrated that Mr. Gigante’s bathrobes were chosen with care: In public, his coverings were soiled and tattered. Inside, he slipped into something pristine.
“They respected him,” George A. Stamboulidis, Mr. Weissmann’s trial partner, said of his colleague and their mob witnesses. “He’s very bright and to the point but also has a pretty good read of his audience. It was definitely a relationship of mutual respect.”
Geoffrey S. Mearns, a former prosecutor in the Eastern District who is now the president of Ball State University in Indiana, said Mr. Weissmann’s personality mirrored that of the office — with its collection of scrappy, ambitious obsessives out to prove their relative mettle in a city where another office, the Southern District in Manhattan, was often viewed as more prestigious.
That their targets were some of the city’s most fearsome murderers tended to focus the mind, as well.
“He was trained in this environment that we were essentially going after these entrenched mob bosses,” Mr. Mearns said. “He’s trained as a prosecutor to be aggressive.”
‘I Don’t Drink Evian’
The locals did not all take well to their visitors from the federal government, dispatched to Houston after the collapse of Enron to investigate and prosecute the company’s fraud.
“Out-of-town, carpetbagging, Evian-swilling Department of Justice lawyers,” read one description in The Houston Chronicle.
This was an outrage, Mr. Weissmann told a reporter then. “I don’t drink Evian.”
It was this swagger that helped define the government’s posture as the task force went about its work, first with Mr. Weissmann as deputy director, then later as director. (Mr. Mueller, as F.B.I. director at the time, helped form the group.)
Their triumphs were many: With little precedent for such a complex inquiry into financial wrongdoing, the team won indictments and prison terms for almost all of the company’s top executives.
Mr. Weissmann was credited with acting on a hunch that Ben F. Glisan Jr., the former Enron treasurer who had already pleaded guilty without agreeing to cooperate, might be willing to say more. United States marshals hauled in Mr. Glisan from prison, at Mr. Weissmann’s direction, to appear before a grand jury. He became a key witness.
Prosecutors also initially earned a conviction of Arthur Andersen, an accounting firm charged with illegally destroying documents related to its audit of Enron, for obstruction of justice.
Colleagues praised his resourcefulness and legal guile. Opponents accused him of overreach, citing a series of overturned convictions and higher-court losses. Among the setbacks for the task force, the Arthur Andersen victory was unanimously overturned by the Supreme Court over a narrow issue involving jury instructions. Long before that outcome, the case had drawn ferocious criticism from members of the business community, who argued that the indictment alone amounted to a death sentence for the firm.
“It’s pretty clear that Weissmann created a culture in which they presumed that the people they were investigating were guilty,” said Tom Kirkendall, a Houston defense lawyer who represented clients on Enron-related cases.
This reputation has trailed Mr. Weissmann among some defense lawyers in the years since, propagated most vocally by a lawyer and author, Sidney Powell, whose work has been taken up by Trump allies like Newt Gingrich. (In 2015, Ms. Powell criticized Mr. Weissmann in an article for The New York Observer — which was owned by Jared Kushner, Mr. Trump’s son-in-law — after Mr. Weissmann was named to lead the Justice Department’s criminal fraud section.)
But those close to Mr. Weissmann — and some others less inclined to appreciate the work of prosecutors generally — have zealously defended his ethical compass.
Peter Neufeld, a civil rights lawyer and a founder of the Innocence Project, praised Mr. Weissmann’s nerve during his time at the F.B.I., as the agency grappled with the fallout of exonerations based on erroneous testimony from forensic hair examiners.
“He realized that what had gone on in the past was wrong,” Mr. Neufeld said, recalling Mr. Weissmann’s decision to order an audit of hundreds of convictions that may have relied on faulty testimony. “He did it. That was transformative.”
By 2013, both Mr. Weissmann and Mr. Mueller had left the agency. It seemed unlikely that they would partner again.
Then came the call last spring.
Last edited:
What's not surprising, and at the same time distressing and showcase of what the issues in the country are is the lack of awareness, esp. from people in my age range, which is 32. I have friends who are mostly more affluent, (from birth) and about 10-20 years older who are following this, and read the post, NYT, etc, but my own age group and social circle? No one, with one or two exceptions. Most hardly worth mentioning, their shallow grasp of the subject. In the last say 5 days, no one my age, or slightly younger, to about 28 has any real idea, much less understanding about what is going on. Too much social media, personal life, myopia to understand an essentially pivotal and monumental time in history, one way or another.
Last edited:
I hear you man.
I'm 5+ years younger than you. Imagine my situation.
But in Cali it's different. I was at the mechanic on Sunday. I overheard an older Mexican guy, who was at least 55, talking to the owner about Maddow's episode on Niger. This guy had a thick Mexican accent but spoke fluent English. I turned around and approached him. We talked for a good 30 minutes about everything that's going on. I put him on the Lawfare podcast and Preet's podcast and he was hella appreciative. He told me Maddow is his personal hero. He was ranting about Trump Jr. 
NYTimes pushing articles 24/7 
These new court documents say Manafort had 3 passports, an alias, and offices in Ukraine AND Moscow 
Russian Oligarchs funneling him millions...so he and Gates are flight risks.
The Manafort/Gates indictments didn't really reveal much on the Russian connections yet, but these new documents touch on the Russian offices & money.
Russian Oligarchs funneling him millions...so he and Gates are flight risks.
The Manafort/Gates indictments didn't really reveal much on the Russian connections yet, but these new documents touch on the Russian offices & money.
How would it look if Trump were to pardon someone charged with Conspiracy against the United States 
These new court documents say Manafort had 3 passports, an alias, and offices in Ukraine AND Moscow
Russian Oligarchs funneling him millions...so he and Gates are flight risks.
The Manafort/Gates indictments didn't really reveal much on the Russian connections yet, but these new documents touch on the Russian offices & money.
The details. The drip.
NYTimes pushing articles 24/7
88m3
Fast Money & Foreign Objects
biglyHow would it look if Trump were to pardon someone charged with Conspiracy against the United States
88m3
Fast Money & Foreign Objects
Pence is up to his eyeballs in all of this