This "reduced to a role player" angle. Where did the Wolves go when the team went through Love?
THEY DIDNT HAVE A GOOD TEAM .. DOESNT CHANGE THE FACT THAT HE WAS A FRANCHISE PLAYER
This "reduced to a role player" angle. Where did the Wolves go when the team went through Love?
So is Kevin Love a franchise player? Or is he a role player? You seem confused.
I think John Wall is better than Kyrie Irving but I wouldn't label either as a franchise player.
Look, Pau was winning 50 games in the west and taking trash teams to the playoffs and he was labeled a loser because his teams got swept by better west teams, but you seem to give Love and Kyrie a complete pass for never getting CLOSE to the playoffs before LeBron arrived. Your trolling is awful.
Kobe told nikkas, but nah, nah... now another legend in McHale tells u...
Dude only care about weights, being goofy and hunting teenage girls

He doesn't love the game...he just is tall and athletic...he is doing what most of us would do if we were 6'10 and freakishly athletic![]()
He's definitely a good player. But he's not close to being a franchise player.Love's a good player that's been surrounded by bad teams... Until now...and he's certainly not going to be the reason the Cavs dont beat Golden State or SA.
So if he is reduced to being a role player next to LeBron, then LeBron isn't playing with another franchise player. Can't have it both ways.LOVE IS A FRANCHISE PLAYER WHO IS REDUCED TO LOOKING LIKE A ROLE PLAYER BECAUSE LEBRON MAKES HIS TEAMMATES LOOK BAD. ARE U REMEDIAL?
AND NOW JOHN WALL AINT A FRANCHISE PLAYER? AND U GOT THE NERVE TO CALL ME THE CONFUSED ONE?? LOLSMH
He's definitely a good player. But he's not close to being a franchise player.
They are, but Sccit doesn't realize this. If you take the supporting cast from every championship team in recent memory and put them with LeBron, Sccit would be crying foul that Lebrons team was too stacked.Would agree...but those guys are super rare.
about?But he's on a good team now and you make it seem as if he's being held back at the expense of something other than sexy statsTHEY DIDNT HAVE A GOOD TEAM .. DOESNT CHANGE THE FACT THAT HE WAS A FRANCHISE PLAYER
No nikka. It got 12 one stars because you whine like a fakkit when people say anything negative about the Warriors, but then stay hating on Harden and Dwight like they took your bytch. Hop off hypocritical ass nikka. Don't take shots if you can't handle it yourself.
And it was a stupid ass hate thread too. Who the fukk cares. Except First Take watching type nikkas

He was thinking about coming here and I posted I wanted him nowhere near my squad. I'm consistent in my disdain for his competitive mentality.
I thought you said you was going to put me on your ignore listok
that was 3 years ago and your sqaud won a chip since
like the hell is wrong with you
still thinking about something that could've happened several years ago it's kind of disturbing

LIKE I SAID ALREADY, ITS NOT FAIR TO COMPARE CAREERS OF A PLAYER WHO IS JUST STARTING TO SOME1 WHO BEEN IN THE LEAGUE OVER A DECADE. HELL, BRAD MILLER HAD A BETTER CAREER THAN KARL ANTHONY TOWNS .. SEE HOW EASY IT IS. LETS REVISIT THIS IN 5 YEARS, THEY ALL HEADED TOWARDS A MUCH BETTER CAREER PATH.

I thought you said you was going to put me on your ignore list![]()
So if he is reduced to being a role player next to LeBron, then LeBron isn't playing with another franchise player. Can't have it both ways.
I define franchise player as a guy that singlehandedly makes you a contender. A guy you wouldn't really trade under any circumstance. There aren't 30 of those in the league. Guys like Gordon Hayward and Danilo Gallinari aren't franchise players, they just happen to be on teams that don't have any players that are better than they are.
Even if your definition of franchise player is simply being the best player on your team, than neither Irving or Love are franchise players because LeBron is better than they are anyway.