If you understand she was wrong about Omar's stance, then you're admitting that she stood with those who were singularly motivated by Islamophobia.
I stopped reading here because of how insane this claim is.
The logic of your reasoning means that if some madman goes out and guns down the Clinton family tomorrow, you should be held responsible by suggesting here that the Clinton's frequently align themselves with bigots and therefore deserve it.
It would be like saying, if some nut shot up a synagogue, that Omar's tweets stoked anti-semetic views and motivated the shooter to kill jewish people. Would you feel the same way if that was the accusation?
Irrespective of Chelsea's stance on Omar's words, she in no way endorses islamaphobia, and certainly wouldn't condone the slaughter of innocent Muslims at a mosque. And the fact that people like you want to blame well-meaning liberals when the real problem is the Richard Spencers of the world is vile and disgusting.
Last edited: