@SourPowerStraws i know you’re not beefing or starting with HarlemH.. ???I don't need snarky love, sir.
777 died in nyc today....while California is at ZERO
- Thread starter Malcolmxxx_23
- Start date
When comparing the metros combined with those, bay area is still worse... bay cities have smaller pop, its not comparable that way.. why not compare 300 square miles to 300 square miles ? are you under assumption that people in the bay only stay in their city and only in NYC do people travel to other borroughs ? 300 miles is 300 miles regardless of some imaginary lines , right ? theirs more people in a 300 square mile distance in the bay than NYC why is this so hard for NYC people to understand
even if you compare metros, the metropolitan area of NYC and Newark is what came in #5 in the country
I swear internet nikkas will argue about ANYTHING.
NYC been the most densely populated city in the US my whole life. LA been known for its sprawl and corresponding traffic. And breh is in here really tryna argue that it’s more densely populated than NYC.
because businessinsider and huffpost also agree with me
yall pulling yall shyt from fukking wikipedia this why people hate NYC people yall lack critical thinking when it comes from outside your weak ass city guidelines
NYC IS 300 SQUARE MILES ? YES ?
IF YOU COMPARED IT TO 300 SQUARE MILES IN CALIFORNIA IS THAT PART OF CALIFORNIA MORE DENSLEY POPULATED ? YES
RIGHT ?
jesus fukk mafukkas act like straight retards when they log into here
yall so stuck up the last part of New York "City" instead of comparing how many people live in a certain radius compared to that SAME radius in another state
END OF THE DAY just because The Bay Area is broken down in a different way than New York City, more people live within that SAME RADIUS when compared in the Bay than NYC
how the fukk is this hard to comprehend
mafukka said NYC is the most densely populated place in America... actual real websites disagree and NYC posters cant comprehend their city aint #1 in something even as dumb as this subject
its truly amazing
ISO
Pass me the rock nikka
I don’t know what you looking atWhen comparing the metros combined with those, bay area is still worse... bay cities have smaller pop, its not comparable that way.. why not compare 300 square miles to 300 square miles ? are you under assumption that people in the bay only stay in their city and only in NYC do people travel to other borroughs ? 300 miles is 300 miles regardless of some imaginary lines , right ? theirs more people in a 300 square mile distance in the bay than NYC why is this so hard for NYC people to understand
even if you compare metros, the metropolitan area of NYC and Newark is what came in #5 in the country
List of United States cities by population density - Wikipedia
Damn near the whole top 10 is NYC and small cities/towns in the NYC Metro Area. Have you been to NYC? The level of congestion with residents, commuters, tourists in lower Manhattan is ridiculous.
Cel 510 kid ados forever
Veteran
Cali ended up with 25 deaths
Low as hell
Low as hell
The left coast be the best coast
Until that earthquake hits and we become a small island
at The Bama Gov who said they didnt want to be Califirst, i am sorry to hear about the health of people in your circle. Regarding the bolded point, I saw a report last week that noted that COVID rna was detected on fecal matter + sputum up to 2 months after patients had tested negative with nasal swabs.
R.E.N. Spells Ren
Veteran
because businessinsider and huffpost also agree with me
this why people hate NYC people yall lack critical thinking when it comes from outside your weak ass city guidelines
NYC IS 300 SQUARE MILES ? YES ?
IF YOU COMPARED IT TO 300 SQUARE MILES IN CALIFORNIA IS THAT PART OF CALIFORNIA MORE DENSLEY POPULATED ? YES
RIGHT ?
jesus fukk mafukkas act like straight retards when they log into here
yall so stuck up the last part of New York "City" instead of comparing how many people live in a certain radius compared to that SAME radius in another state
END OF THE DAY just because The Bay Area is broken down in a different way than New York City, more people live within that SAME RADIUS when compared in the Bay than NYC
how the fukk is this hard to comprehend
mafukka said NYC is the most densely populated place in America... actual real websites disagree and NYC posters cant comprehend their city aint #1 in something even as dumb as this subject
I’m not a New Yorker. Spare me your diatribes and just tell me the area in the US that you think it’s more densely populated than Manhattan.
so is it manhatten ? or NYC? this what im talking aboutI’m not a New Yorker. Spare me your diatribes and just tell me the area in the US that you think it’s more densely populated than manhattan.
mafukkas pick and choose if they wanna argue borroughs or if its NYC at the flip of a switch, its insane HuffPost is now a part of Verizon Media
here ya go, read mafukka. learn something. It goes over which areas are more populated and why
oh yeah and its not from wikipedia
R.E.N. Spells Ren
Veteran
so is it manhatten ? or NYC? this what im talking about
HuffPost is now a part of Verizon Media
here ya go, read mafukka. learn something.
Your links are worthless, cuz you’re transparently trying to redefine things to fit your argument.
post the population and land area of the city you think is more densely populated than NYC.
yeah a huffinton post from 2017 going over what im talking about here today in 2020 is me trying to redefine population density
you got it champ
typical coli response "your facts and stats backed up by credible sources are worthless
"
HarlemHottie
Uptown Thoroughbred
He
, I'm beefing with HIM. 
R.E.N. Spells Ren
Veteran
yeah a huffinton post from 2017 going over what im talking about here today in 2020 is me trying to redefine population density
you got it champ
You gonna post the area and population of the city you think is more densely populated than NYC, or nah?
I have. Multiple times. But ill do you one better, ill just copy and paste the article since you dont want to read it andj ust run in circles
There is a general perception that the densest US cities are in the Northeast, where downtowns tend to be bigger and inner city densities are higher. However, cities have become much larger geographically, and also include the automobile oriented lower density suburbs that have developed since World War II. In fact, most of the densest major urban areas are in the West.
Since 1950, each decennial census of the United States has defined urban areas, or, areas of continuous urbanization. Urban areas include core cities (municipalities, such as the city of New York or the city of Boston) as well as adjacent suburbs.
Urban areas do not correspond to city limits or jurisdiction borders. They are composed of small census districts that average fewer than 50 residents and can cross state lines. Metropolitan areas, which are often wrongly used interchangeably with urban areas, are based on county boundaries and always contain rural areas. So, metropolitan area densities are a useless statistic for urban density analysis.
New York and Los Angeles
This article ranks the densities of the largest urban areas (cities) in the nation’s 52 metropolitan areas with more than 1,000,000 population.
With the largest population, New York is America’s ultimate city. More than 18 million people live in the urban area. The New York urban area covers the most land area in the world. It stretches far beyond City Hall in Manhattan, 50 miles west to Hackettstown, New Jersey, 90 miles east to Sag Harbor Long Island, 55 miles north to Dutchess County, New York, and 80 miles south to Ocean County, New Jersey. The New York urban area is geographically bigger than Delaware and Rhode Island combined. Nonetheless, New York has fallen behind Los Angeles, San Francisco, and San Jose in urban density.
Despite its international reputation for endless urban sprawl, the densest major city is Los Angeles. Los Angeles covers one-half the land area of New York, with two-thirds the population (12.2 million). With an area of 1,736 square miles, Los Angeles has an urban density of 6,999 per square mile. The urban core of Los Angeles is much less dense than New York, but the suburbs (where most people live) are twice as dense.
Six urban areas are geographically larger than Los Angeles. These include New York, Atlanta (2,645 square miles), Chicago (2,443), Boston (1,873), Philadelphia (1,981) and Dallas-Fort Worth (1,779). Among these, Boston is reputed for its high density urban core. But because of its very low density suburbs, Boston is less than one-third as dense as Los Angeles and less dense than cities perceived to have lower density, such as Phoenix and Houston. (For complete information on urban area, core municipality and suburban, see here.)
Balance of the Top Ten
San Francisco is the second densest city, at 6,266 per square mile. San Francisco has a dense urban core like New York. But more of San Francisco looks like Los Angeles than New York. Its suburbs are 50 percent more dense than those of New York.
San Jose ranks third, with an urban density of 5,820. Yet, even with virtually no pre-automobile urban core, San Jose is more dense than New York. This is because its all-suburban urban form is dense enough to erase the effect of New York’s hyper dense urban core.
Las Vegas ranks fifth (after New York), with a density of 4,525. Las Vegas was too small to be a metropolitan area in 1950, and like San Jose is composed of virtually all post-war suburban development.
Miami ranks sixth, at 4,238 , with a higher core density and higher density suburbs.
The next three positions are occupied by #7 San Diego (4,037), #8 Salt Lake City (3,675) and #9 Sacramento (3,660). In each case, these cities have denser suburbs than average, which is the principal reason for their strong rankings.
New Orleans is the 10th densest city, which represents a substantial decline from 2000. Before Hurricane Katrina (2005), New Orleans ranked fifth in the nation, at 5,096. Its 2010 density (3,579) was a full 30 percent lower than in 2000.